Meloidogyne graminicola · Oryza sativa (rice)

33 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. Trichoderma harzianumPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. fluensulfonePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. Pseudomonas fluorescensResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  4. carbofuranResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. carbosulfanResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. phorateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. Amaranthus spinosusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. Azadirachta indicaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. Pseudomonas putidaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. Spinacia oleraceaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. TrichodermaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. Vigna unguiculataResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. calcium atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  14. fluopyramResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. magnesium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. oxamylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. inoculationPositive and negative results13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  18. applicationPositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  19. transgenicPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  20. botanicalResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  21. loss of functionResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  22. transplantingResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  23. fertilizationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  24. floodingResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  25. seed treatmentResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  26. insecticideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  27. pathogen productResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  28. solarizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  29. biocontrolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  30. infectionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  31. irrigationResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  32. nitrogenResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  33. rotationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.