inoculation · Meloidogyne graminicola · Oryza sativa (rice)
43 claims from these papers; 7 citations between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
7 citations between these papers: 5 on the same side, 2 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 8
Bio-management of Meloidogyne graminicola by Trichoderma harzianum and T. virens in rice · 2005
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- positive
Biocontrol of Meloidogyne graminicola using rhizobacteria on rice seedlings · 2010
- positive
Effect of Rhizobacteria as Seed Inoculation on Root-Knot Nematode and Plant Growth in Rice-Nursery · 2011
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 5
- negative
- negative
First Report of Meloidogyne graminicola on Rice in Anhui Province, China · 2020
- negative
First Report of Meloidogyne graminicola on Rice in Henan Province, China · 2021
- negative
- negative
Meloidogyne graminicola’s Effect on Growth Performance of Rice under Low Population Density · 2022
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.