Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pre-inoculation application of Trichoderma significantly improved rice plant growth compared with nematode-inoculated checks.

A claim from Bio-management of Meloidogyne graminicola by Trichoderma harzianum and T. virens in rice · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-inoculation application of Trichoderma significantly improved rice plant growth compared with nematode-inoculated checks.

Treatment
applied one week prior to nematode inoculation at 4 and 8 g dose/kg soile1
Interactor
Meloidogyne graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae0pathogen
Second interactor
T. harzianum or T. virensTrichoderma harzianumTrichoderma virense1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant growth characterse2
Direction
improvemente2
Comparator
nematode inoculated checke2
Setting
net housee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A net house study was conducted to test the bio-efficacy of Trichoderma harzianum and T. virens against rice root knot nematode Meloidogyne graminicola on rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–159
e1

“either T. harzianum or T. virens was applied one week prior to nematode inoculation at 4 and 8 g dose/kg soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–296
e2

“There was significant improvement in plant growth characters and suppression in number of galls and number of M. graminicola larvae penetrated/plant as well as final nematode population in soil compared to only nematode inoculated check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–534

Title

Bio-management of Meloidogyne graminicola by Trichoderma harzianum and T. virens in rice

K.N. Pathak; Ritesh Ranjan; Manoj Kumar; et al. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 2005

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-6e7744eb4100f39aa9c25a93534a53415994da1478b25c413a465242aaecc482 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

inoculation · Meloidogyne graminicola · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.