Nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)

50 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. silicon atomPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. ammonium sulfatePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. brassinolidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  4. zinc atomResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. Triticum aestivumResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. sulfur atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. CyanobacteriotaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. AzospirillumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. Psophocarpus tetragonolobusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. amino acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. ammoniumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. cyanoguanidineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. nitrification inhibitorResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. oxamideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. potassium chlorideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. silicon dioxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. zinc oxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. nitrogenPositive and negative results262 papers: 217 positive, 45 negative or no effect
  19. fertilizationPositive and negative results220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect
  20. irrigationPositive and negative results36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  21. tillagePositive and negative results27 papers: 21 positive, 6 negative or no effect
  22. phosphorusPositive and negative results22 papers: 17 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  23. biocharPositive and negative results19 papers: 14 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  24. transplantingPositive and negative results18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  25. potassiumPositive and negative results17 papers: 9 positive, 8 negative or no effect
  26. applicationPositive and negative results16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  27. climate sitePositive and negative results16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  28. organicPositive and negative results16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  29. nanoparticlePositive and negative results12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  30. densityPositive and negative results9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  31. processingPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  32. floodingPositive and negative results8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  33. limePositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  34. loss of functionPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  35. rotationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  36. in vitroPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  37. droughtPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  38. herbicidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  39. trap barrierPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  40. botanicalResults agree16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  41. inoculationResults agree13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  42. otherResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  43. storageResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  44. transgenicResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  45. co2Results agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  46. cultivation systemResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  47. mulchingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  48. shadeResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  49. rainfallResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  50. stageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.