Soil: physics · Oryza sativa (rice)

1. cadmium atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. silicon atomResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Triticum aestivumResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. N-benzyladenineResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. Vicia villosaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. paraquatResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. biocharResults differ15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
9. fertilizationPositive and negative results45 papers: 39 positive, 6 negative or no effect
10. tillagePositive and negative results41 papers: 35 positive, 6 negative or no effect
11. irrigationPositive and negative results29 papers: 26 positive, 3 negative or no effect
12. organicPositive and negative results21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect
13. transplantingPositive and negative results14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect
14. nitrogenPositive and negative results12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect
15. droughtPositive and negative results11 papers: 3 positive, 8 negative or no effect
16. heatPositive and negative results11 papers: 3 positive, 8 negative or no effect
17. coldPositive and negative results10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect
18. storagePositive and negative results9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect
19. floodingPositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
20. rotationPositive and negative results7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect
21. salinityPositive and negative results6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect
22. cultivation systemPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
23. sowing timePositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
24. phosphorusPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
25. radiationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
26. rainfallPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
27. trap barrierPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
28. windPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
29. mulchingResults agree13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect
30. processingResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
31. otherResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
32. inoculationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. nanoparticleResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. classResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
35. growing mediumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
36. humidityResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
37. limeResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
38. loss of functionResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
39. mycorrhizaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
40. potassiumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
41. applicationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
42. in vitroResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
43. pruningResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
44. seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
45. shadeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.