nitrogen · Quality: grain · Sorghum
19 claims from these papers.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 12
Nutritive value of corn and sorghum silages for milk production · 1975
- positive
- negative
- positive
Effects of Fertilization on Biomass and Quality of Continuous Cropping Sweet Sorghum · 2012
- positive
Production and nutritional value of sorghum and black oat forages under nitrogen fertilization · 2013
- positive
- positive
- positive
Agronomic Biofortification of Fodder Sorghum with Zinc under Different Levels of Nitrogen · 2018
- positive
- positive
Effect of Nano Fertilizers on Growth, Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Soil Microbiology of Kharif Sorghum · 2023
- positive
- positive
Split application of nitrogen level on quality parameters of fodder sorghum · 2024
- positive
- positive
- positive
Influence of biofertilizer and nano urea on growth and yield of sorghum · 2025
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 2
- no effect
- no effect
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.