Abstract
Results are given from 7 trials in which maize and sorghum silages were compared for milk production. In one trial milk production was significantly higher from cows fed silage of forage sorghum cv. Leafmaster 43 plus lucerne/urea pellets than from those fed maize silage. In a further trial, milk production was significantly higher from cows fed sorghum Leafmaster 43 silage than from those fed forage sorghum Funks G-102F which in turn gave higher yields than those fed grain sorghum Taylor-Evans Y-101 silage. In a comparison of 4 maize silages the contents of TDN and of digestible energy were highest in cv. Dixie 77 and ARK 6634D. In a 2nd trial with maize grown under soil moisture stress, TDN and digestible energy values were highest for AKS 22 silage. TDN content was higher in silage of ARK 6108 and ARK 6108D than in sorghum Leafmaster 43. Feeding urea at 15 lb/ton with silage of sorghum cv. Atlas significantly increased CP digestibility and N retention by steers and significantly decreased energy digestibility
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Milk production was significantly higher from cows fed forage sorghum Leafmaster 43 silage plus lucerne/urea pellets than from cows fed maize silage.
Verbatim
e1“In one trial milk production was significantly higher from cows fed silage of forage sorghum cv. Leafmaster 43 plus lucerne/urea pellets than from those fed maize silage”
Claim · model-written summary
Milk production was significantly higher from cows fed sorghum Leafmaster 43 silage than from cows fed forage sorghum Funks G-102F.
- Treatment
- sorghum Leafmaster 43 silagee2
- Outcome
- milk productione2
- Direction
- highere2
- Comparator
- forage sorghum Funks G-102Fe2
SorghumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“In a further trial, milk production was significantly higher from cows fed sorghum Leafmaster 43 silage than from those fed forage sorghum Funks G-102F which in turn gave higher yields than those fed grain sorghum Taylor-Evans Y-101 silage”
Claim · model-written summary
Forage sorghum Funks G-102F gave higher yields than grain sorghum Taylor-Evans Y-101 silage.
Verbatim
e2“In a further trial, milk production was significantly higher from cows fed sorghum Leafmaster 43 silage than from those fed forage sorghum Funks G-102F which in turn gave higher yields than those fed grain sorghum Taylor-Evans Y-101 silage”
Claim · model-written summary
Among four maize silages, TDN and digestible energy contents were highest in cv. Dixie 77 and ARK 6634D.
- Material
- Dixie 77 and ARK 6634De3
- Outcome
- contents of TDN and of digestible energye3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Comparator
- 4 maize silagese3
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“In a comparison of 4 maize silages the contents of TDN and of digestible energy were highest in cv. Dixie 77 and ARK 6634D”
Claim · model-written summary
Under soil moisture stress, TDN and digestible energy values were highest for AKS 22 maize silage.
- Material
- AKS 22e4
- Treatment
- soil moisture stresse4
- Outcome
- TDN and digestible energy valuese4
- Direction
- higheste4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“In a 2nd trial with maize grown under soil moisture stress, TDN and digestible energy values were highest for AKS 22 silage”
Claim · model-written summary
TDN content was higher in ARK 6108 and ARK 6108D silages than in sorghum Leafmaster 43 silage.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0 - Material
- ARK 6108 and ARK 6108De5
- Outcome
- TDN contente5
- Direction
- highere5
- Comparator
- sorghum Leafmaster 43e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“TDN content was higher in silage of ARK 6108 and ARK 6108D than in sorghum Leafmaster 43”
t0“Nutritive value of corn and sorghum silages for milk production”
Claim · model-written summary
Urea at 15 lb/ton fed with sorghum cv. Atlas silage significantly increased CP digestibility and N retention in steers.
- Material
- Atlase6
- Treatment
- urea at 15 lb/tone6
- Outcome
- CP digestibility and N retentione6
- Direction
- increasede6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“Feeding urea at 15 lb/ton with silage of sorghum cv. Atlas significantly increased CP digestibility and N retention by steers and significantly decreased energy digestibility”
Claim · model-written summary
Urea at 15 lb/ton fed with sorghum cv. Atlas silage significantly decreased energy digestibility in steers.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“Feeding urea at 15 lb/ton with silage of sorghum cv. Atlas significantly increased CP digestibility and N retention by steers and significantly decreased energy digestibility”
The same questions in other papers
Medicago sativa · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
processing · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →nitrogen · quality: grain · SorghumPositive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →nitrogen · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
286 papers more in this group
See all 290 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.