herbicide · Cirsium arvense · Triticum aestivum (wheat)

Results agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.

How these papers cite each other

1 citation between these papers: 1 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect1990199520002005201020152020
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 5

  1. Canada thistle regrowth control one year after herbicide application in winter wheat · 1986

  2. Fall-applied Herbicides for Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) Root and Root Bud Control in Reduced-till Spring Wheat · 1992

    cites 1 paper here

  3. Effectiveness and economics of repeated sequences of herbicides for Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) control in reduced-till spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) · 1992

    cited by 1 paper here

  4. Postemergence Herbicide Applications Impact Canada Thistle Control and Spring Wheat Yields · 2019

  5. Harmfulness of the aweed plant Cirsium arvense and spring wheat productivity after herbicides application · 2020

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

herbicide on Triticum aestivum (wheat) against other targets