shade · Yield · Ananas comosus (pineapple)
8 claims from these papers; 2 citations between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 1
1 pair of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Effect of shading screens on the production and quality of ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapple (2021)
increaseIn summer, 50 % shade raised total yield per hectare by 22 %.
Impact of the Combination of Chemical and Organic Fertilization on the Growth and Yield of Pineapple under Two Shade Net Conditions (2024)decreaseShade net installation at 45 days decreased pineapple growth and yield.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
2 citations between these papers: 0 on the same side, 2 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 4
Morpho-anatomy of leaves and yield of pineapple plant in intercropping with cassava · 2016
- positive
Effects of time and height of shading on yield and quality of pineapple · 2020
- positive
Effect of shading screens on the production and quality of ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapple · 2021
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Technologies for reducing water consumption by pineapples in the semi-arid region · 2024
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.