Paper · 2024 · Ciência Rural

Technologies for reducing water consumption by pineapples in the semi-arid region

Bruno Soares da Silva; Victor Martins Maia; Silvânio Rodrigues dos Santos; et al.

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

ABSTRACT: In irrigated systems, the adoption of management methods like soil cover, polymers which absorb the water present in the soil and the utilization of shading screens can decrease the water consumption by the plants. This is achieved as these means protect the plant and soil against radiation and wavelengths of light undesirable for cultivation. However, for pineapple cultivation in the semi-arid climate regions, very little study has been done regarding these technologies. Hence, the present study conducted to assess the pineapple growth, production and quality when various kinds of soil cover, red shading screen and water absorption polymers are employed. To accomplish this, a field trial was performed utilizing four types of soil cover in the plots (plastic mulching; organic matter; organic matter + red shading screen 50%; plastic mulching + red shading screen 50% and the control (no cover).Two treatments were included in the subplots namely, either the absence or presence of a water-absorbing polymer in the planting hole (0.5 g per plant), arranged in subdivided plots. We adopted the Randomized Complete Block (RCB) , with three replications. The following aspects of the plants were studied: naturally flowering, stem diameter; leaf area index; D-leaf area and total leaf area; fruit weight with crown; fruit weight without crown; fruit length with crown; and fruit length without crown, as well as the traits of the post-harvest fruit, soluble solids, titratable acidity, pH and the soluble solids/titratable acidity ratio. Further, the productivity in t ha-1 and efficiency of water use (EUA) were ascertained. It was evident that the plastic mulching + 50% red shading screen favored the vegetative development and productivity of the ‘IAC Fantástico’ pineapple plants. The characteristics of the quality of the postharvest fruit were unaffected by the treatments. The shading screen reduced the percentages of natural flowering in the treatments which included organic matter + red shading screen 50% and plastic mulching + red shading screen 50%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch with 50% red shade favored vegetative development.

Taxon
pineappleAnanas comosuse0
Material
‘IAC Fantástico’e0
Treatment
plastic mulching + 50% red shading screene0
Outcome
vegetative developmente0
Direction
favorede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ananas comosus
Ananas comosus · TaxonVpuipV ,pemegang hak cipta · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plastic mulching + 50% red shading screen favored the vegetative development and productivity of the ‘IAC Fantástico’ pineapple plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch with 50% red shade favored productivity.

Taxon
pineappleAnanas comosuse0
Material
‘IAC Fantástico’e0
Treatment
plastic mulching + 50% red shading screene0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
favorede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ananas comosus
Ananas comosus · TaxonVpuipV ,pemegang hak cipta · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plastic mulching + 50% red shading screen favored the vegetative development and productivity of the ‘IAC Fantástico’ pineapple plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments did not affect postharvest fruit quality.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
quality of the postharvest fruite0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The characteristics of the quality of the postharvest fruit were unaffected by the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1803–1896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red shade reduced natural flowering in organic matter plots.

Treatment
organic matter + red shading screen 50%e0
Outcome
percentages of natural floweringe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The shading screen reduced the percentages of natural flowering in the treatments which included organic matter + red shading screen 50% and plastic mulching + red shading screen 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1898–2080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red shade reduced natural flowering in plastic mulch plots.

Treatment
plastic mulching + red shading screen 50%e0
Outcome
percentages of natural floweringe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The shading screen reduced the percentages of natural flowering in the treatments which included organic matter + red shading screen 50% and plastic mulching + red shading screen 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1898–2080 · show in text ↑

shade · yield · Ananas comosus (pineapple)Results differ

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mulching · phenology · Ananas comosus (pineapple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

shade · growth · Ananas comosus (pineapple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mulching · growth · Ananas comosus (pineapple)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mulching · yield · Ananas comosus (pineapple)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.