Paper · 2024 · Agronomy

Impact of the Combination of Chemical and Organic Fertilization on the Growth and Yield of Pineapple under Two Shade Net Conditions

Jonathan Martínez-Conde; Rogelio Enrique Palacios-Torres; Ana Rosa Ramírez-Seañez; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The use of organic sources presents itself as a viable alternative to mitigate the excessive reliance on chemical fertilizers in agricultural practices. However, in the realm of pineapple cultivation, research exploring the synergy between chemical and organic fertilizers remains scarce. In this context, the objective of this research was to evaluate the impact of the combination of chemical and organic fertilizers on the growth and yield of the MD-2 pineapple cultivar under two shade net conditions (installed 45 and 250 days after planting). The experiment was conducted in a split-plot design, with the main plot being the shade net conditions and the sub-plots the five fertilization treatments, which were applied 18 times via drip irrigation (control, 100% chemical fertilization, 50% reduced chemical fertilization, organic fertilization, and a combination of 50% chemical fertilization with organic fertilization). The results showed that the early installation of shade netting 45 days after planting decreases the growth and yield of pineapple; thus, the use of shade netting at this age is not recommended. Regarding fertilization, the combination of 50% chemical fertilization with organic fertilization showed similar growth and yield values compared to 100% conventional chemical fertilization under both shade net conditions. Furthermore, this combination presented similar nitrate and potassium values in the plant and did not negatively affect malic acid content. Therefore, the use of organic fertilizers in pineapple cultivation is a promising strategy to reduce the excessive use of chemical fertilizers, and it could also improve soil fertility.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade net installation at 45 days decreased pineapple growth and yield.

Taxon
pineappleAnanas comosuse0
Treatment
shade netting 45 days after plantinge0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ananas comosus
Ananas comosus · TaxonVpuipV ,pemegang hak cipta · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the early installation of shade netting 45 days after planting decreases the growth and yield of pineapple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined chemical and organic fertilization gave similar growth and yield to conventional chemical fertilization.

Taxon
pineappleAnanas comosust0
Treatment
50% chemical fertilization with organic fertilizatione0
Outcome
growth and yield valuese0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
100% conventional chemical fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ananas comosus
Ananas comosus · TaxonVpuipV ,pemegang hak cipta · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of 50% chemical fertilization with organic fertilization showed similar growth and yield values compared to 100% conventional chemical fertilization under both shade net conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1344 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of the Combination of Chemical and Organic Fertilization on the Growth and Yield of Pineapple under Two Shade Net Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilization gave similar plant nitrate and potassium values.

Taxon
pineappleAnanas comosust0
Outcome
nitrate and potassium valuese0
Direction
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ananas comosus
Ananas comosus · TaxonVpuipV ,pemegang hak cipta · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this combination presented similar nitrate and potassium values in the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1435 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of the Combination of Chemical and Organic Fertilization on the Growth and Yield of Pineapple under Two Shade Net Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilization did not negatively affect pineapple malic acid content.

Taxon
pineappleAnanas comosust0
Outcome
malic acid contente0
Direction
did not negatively affecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ananas comosus
Ananas comosus · TaxonVpuipV ,pemegang hak cipta · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“did not negatively affect malic acid content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1484 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of the Combination of Chemical and Organic Fertilization on the Growth and Yield of Pineapple under Two Shade Net Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑

shade · yield · Ananas comosus (pineapple)Results differ

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

organic · yield · Ananas comosus (pineapple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

trap barrier · yield · Ananas comosus (pineapple)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · yield · Ananas comosus (pineapple)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 27 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.