Paper · 2001

Preventing sunburn in pineapple [Ananas comosus]

Makoto Takeuchi; Matsutake Higa; K. Gibu; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Pineapple often sunburns as the fruits mature. At this time, the standing practice is to cover the fruits with a paper bag and tie the leaves over the fruit. This is hard work and has led to attempts to use nets to cover the entire row to reduce the overall labor. The impact on quality and size in summer pineapple fruits covered with russel nets, were studied. The study was to determine which materials are the most suitable to prevention of sunburn in pineapple. 1) Pineapple fruit is burned in sunlight in conjunction with high temperatures. Consequently, no less than 30% shade must be provided to protect the fruit from sunburn. 2) We found that using white russel nets allowed cultivation of good quality fruits. 3) On the other hand, the same nets were not suitable to prevent sunburn which occurred due to the low rate of shade provided in full, direct sunlight. 4) In contrast, blue russel nets with higher shade protection resulted in poor quality fruit. A worse side effect was that harvest efficiency declined due to the problems in judging fruit appearance under such nets. 5) Black russel nets allowed high harvest efficiency because the fruit' could be viewed through the net. Black 4 mm-mesh russel net was found to be the best material of all nets because it was inexpensive and did not damage the quality of pineapple fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pineapple fruit sunburn occurred with sunlight and high temperatures.

Taxon
PineappleAnanas comosuse0
Outcome
fruit is burnede0
Qualifier
high temperaturese0
Setting
sunlighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ananas comosus
Ananas comosus · TaxonVpuipV ,pemegang hak cipta · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pineapple fruit is burned in sunlight in conjunction with high temperatures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–546 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

At least 30% shade was recommended to prevent pineapple fruit sunburn.

Taxon
pineappleAnanas comosust0
Treatment
no less than 30% shadee0
Outcome
protect the fruit from sunburne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ananas comosus
Ananas comosus · TaxonVpuipV ,pemegang hak cipta · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no less than 30% shade must be provided to protect the fruit from sunburn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–634 · show in text ↑
t0

“pineapple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White russel nets allowed cultivation of good quality pineapple fruit.

Taxon
pineappleAnanas comosust0
Treatment
white russel netse0
Outcome
good quality fruitse0
Direction
good qualitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ananas comosus
Ananas comosus · TaxonVpuipV ,pemegang hak cipta · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using white russel nets allowed cultivation of good quality fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“pineapple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White russel nets did not prevent sunburn in full, direct sunlight because they provided too little shade.

Taxon
pineappleAnanas comosust0
Treatment
the same netse0
Outcome
sunburne0
Direction
not suitable to prevente0
Qualifier
low rate of shadee0
Setting
full, direct sunlighte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ananas comosus
Ananas comosus · TaxonVpuipV ,pemegang hak cipta · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the same nets were not suitable to prevent sunburn which occurred due to the low rate of shade provided in full, direct sunlight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“pineapple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue russel nets resulted in poor pineapple fruit quality.

Taxon
pineappleAnanas comosust0
Treatment
blue russel netse0
Outcome
quality fruite0
Direction
poore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ananas comosus
Ananas comosus · TaxonVpuipV ,pemegang hak cipta · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“blue russel nets with higher shade protection resulted in poor quality fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–965 · show in text ↑
t0

“pineapple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue russel nets reduced harvest efficiency because fruit appearance was hard to judge.

Taxon
pineappleAnanas comosust0
Treatment
blue russel netse1
Outcome
harvest efficiencye0
Direction
declinede0
Qualifier
problems in judging fruit appearancee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ananas comosus
Ananas comosus · TaxonVpuipV ,pemegang hak cipta · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“harvest efficiency declined due to the problems in judging fruit appearance under such nets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1087 · show in text ↑
e1

“blue russel nets with higher shade protection resulted in poor quality fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–965 · show in text ↑
t0

“pineapple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black russel nets allowed high harvest efficiency because fruit could be viewed through them.

Taxon
pineappleAnanas comosust0
Treatment
Black russel netse0
Outcome
harvest efficiencye0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ananas comosus
Ananas comosus · TaxonVpuipV ,pemegang hak cipta · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Black russel nets allowed high harvest efficiency because the fruit' could be viewed through the net”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“pineapple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–31 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Black 4 mm-mesh russel net was judged the best net material because it was inexpensive and preserved pineapple fruit quality.

Taxon
pineappleAnanas comosuse0
Treatment
Black 4 mm-mesh russel nete0
Outcome
best material of all netse0
Qualifier
inexpensive and did not damage the quality of pineapple fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ananas comosus
Ananas comosus · TaxonVpuipV ,pemegang hak cipta · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Black 4 mm-mesh russel net was found to be the best material of all nets because it was inexpensive and did not damage the quality of pineapple fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1344 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · yield · Ananas comosus (pineapple)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.