Abstract
Pineapple often sunburns as the fruits mature. At this time, the standing practice is to cover the fruits with a paper bag and tie the leaves over the fruit. This is hard work and has led to attempts to use nets to cover the entire row to reduce the overall labor. The impact on quality and size in summer pineapple fruits covered with russel nets, were studied. The study was to determine which materials are the most suitable to prevention of sunburn in pineapple. 1) Pineapple fruit is burned in sunlight in conjunction with high temperatures. Consequently, no less than 30% shade must be provided to protect the fruit from sunburn. 2) We found that using white russel nets allowed cultivation of good quality fruits. 3) On the other hand, the same nets were not suitable to prevent sunburn which occurred due to the low rate of shade provided in full, direct sunlight. 4) In contrast, blue russel nets with higher shade protection resulted in poor quality fruit. A worse side effect was that harvest efficiency declined due to the problems in judging fruit appearance under such nets. 5) Black russel nets allowed high harvest efficiency because the fruit' could be viewed through the net. Black 4 mm-mesh russel net was found to be the best material of all nets because it was inexpensive and did not damage the quality of pineapple fruits.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Pineapple fruit sunburn occurred with sunlight and high temperatures.
- Taxon
- Pineapple
Ananas comosuse0 - Outcome
- fruit is burnede0
- Qualifier
- high temperaturese0
- Setting
- sunlighte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Pineapple fruit is burned in sunlight in conjunction with high temperatures.”
Claim · model-written summary
At least 30% shade was recommended to prevent pineapple fruit sunburn.
- Taxon
- pineapple
Ananas comosust0 - Treatment
- no less than 30% shadee0
- Outcome
- protect the fruit from sunburne0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“no less than 30% shade must be provided to protect the fruit from sunburn”
t0“pineapple”
Claim · model-written summary
White russel nets allowed cultivation of good quality pineapple fruit.
- Taxon
- pineapple
Ananas comosust0 - Treatment
- white russel netse0
- Outcome
- good quality fruitse0
- Direction
- good qualitye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“using white russel nets allowed cultivation of good quality fruits”
t0“pineapple”
Claim · model-written summary
White russel nets did not prevent sunburn in full, direct sunlight because they provided too little shade.
- Taxon
- pineapple
Ananas comosust0 - Treatment
- the same netse0
- Outcome
- sunburne0
- Direction
- not suitable to prevente0
- Qualifier
- low rate of shadee0
- Setting
- full, direct sunlighte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the same nets were not suitable to prevent sunburn which occurred due to the low rate of shade provided in full, direct sunlight”
t0“pineapple”
Claim · model-written summary
Blue russel nets resulted in poor pineapple fruit quality.
- Taxon
- pineapple
Ananas comosust0 - Treatment
- blue russel netse0
- Outcome
- quality fruite0
- Direction
- poore0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“blue russel nets with higher shade protection resulted in poor quality fruit”
t0“pineapple”
Claim · model-written summary
Blue russel nets reduced harvest efficiency because fruit appearance was hard to judge.
- Taxon
- pineapple
Ananas comosust0 - Treatment
- blue russel netse1
- Outcome
- harvest efficiencye0
- Direction
- declinede0
- Qualifier
- problems in judging fruit appearancee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“harvest efficiency declined due to the problems in judging fruit appearance under such nets”
e1“blue russel nets with higher shade protection resulted in poor quality fruit”
t0“pineapple”
Claim · model-written summary
Black russel nets allowed high harvest efficiency because fruit could be viewed through them.
- Taxon
- pineapple
Ananas comosust0 - Treatment
- Black russel netse0
- Outcome
- harvest efficiencye0
- Direction
- highe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Black russel nets allowed high harvest efficiency because the fruit' could be viewed through the net”
t0“pineapple”
Claim · model-written summary
Black 4 mm-mesh russel net was judged the best net material because it was inexpensive and preserved pineapple fruit quality.
- Taxon
- pineapple
Ananas comosuse0 - Treatment
- Black 4 mm-mesh russel nete0
- Outcome
- best material of all netse0
- Qualifier
- inexpensive and did not damage the quality of pineapple fruitse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Black 4 mm-mesh russel net was found to be the best material of all nets because it was inexpensive and did not damage the quality of pineapple fruits”
The same questions in other papers
trap barrier · yield · Ananas comosus (pineapple)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.