Paper · 2014

Productivity and Profitability of Different Fruit Crops Grown in Multi-Storey Fruit Garden

Mahmud Rahman; M. Madon; Gopal Saha

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment on established multi-storied fruit garden (coconut + litchi + sweet orange+ pineapple) was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Raikhali, BARI, Rangamati Hill District from January 2009 to December 2012. The sole garden of each fruit crop was also made. In multi-storied fruit garden each fruit crop was taken as one treatment and its sole garden, as another treatment. Light availability for litchi, sweet orange and pine apple were about 55% less than that for the sole crop of the respective fruits and for the coconut tree as sole and in the multi-storey fruit garden. The shade provided by coconut tree helped producing quality sweet orange fruit. The growth of the pineapple plant was positively influenced by the shade and as a result maximum individual fruit was obtained compared to sole crop. The equivalent yield of each fruit crop was higher than its sole crop. The land equivalent ratio for multi-strata fruit garden was 2.6. The maximum gross margin of Tk.12,47,083.19 per ha/year and the highest BCR of 6.79 were obtained from multi-stored fruit garden.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light availability for litchi was about 55% less in the multi-storey garden than for the sole crop.

Taxon
litchiLitchie1
Treatment
multi-storey fruit gardene1
Outcome
Light availabilitye1
Direction
lesse1
Value
55%e1
Comparator
sole crop of the respective fruitse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Fruit Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“Light availability for litchi, sweet orange and pine apple were about 55% less than that for the sole crop of the respective fruits and for the coconut tree as sole and in the multi-storey fruit garden”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light availability for sweet orange was about 55% less in the multi-storey garden than for the sole crop.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment
multi-storey fruit gardene1
Outcome
Light availabilitye1
Direction
lesse1
Value
55%e1
Comparator
sole crop of the respective fruitse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Fruit Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“Light availability for litchi, sweet orange and pine apple were about 55% less than that for the sole crop of the respective fruits and for the coconut tree as sole and in the multi-storey fruit garden”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light availability for pine apple was about 55% less in the multi-storey garden than for the sole crop.

Taxon
pine appleAnanas comosuse1
Treatment
multi-storey fruit gardene1
Outcome
Light availabilitye1
Direction
lesse1
Value
55%e1
Comparator
sole crop of the respective fruitse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ananas comosus
Ananas comosus · TaxonVpuipV ,pemegang hak cipta · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Fruit Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“Light availability for litchi, sweet orange and pine apple were about 55% less than that for the sole crop of the respective fruits and for the coconut tree as sole and in the multi-storey fruit garden”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The shade of the coconut tree helped produce better-quality sweet orange fruit.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise2
Treatment
shade provided by coconut treee2
Outcome
quality sweet orange fruite2
Direction
helpede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Fruit Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–55 · show in text ↑
e2

“The shade provided by coconut tree helped producing quality sweet orange fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth of the pineapple plant was positively influenced by shade compared with the sole crop.

Taxon
pineappleAnanas comosuse3
Treatment
the shadee3
Outcome
growth of the pineapple plante3
Direction
positively influencede3
Comparator
sole crope3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ananas comosus
Ananas comosus · TaxonVpuipV ,pemegang hak cipta · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Fruit Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–55 · show in text ↑
e3

“The growth of the pineapple plant was positively influenced by the shade and as a result maximum individual fruit was obtained compared to sole crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–822 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pineapple under shade gave the maximum individual fruit compared with the sole crop.

Taxon
pineappleAnanas comosuse3
Treatment
the shadee3
Outcome
individual fruite3
Direction
maximume3
Comparator
sole crope3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ananas comosus
Ananas comosus · TaxonVpuipV ,pemegang hak cipta · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Fruit Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–55 · show in text ↑
e3

“The growth of the pineapple plant was positively influenced by the shade and as a result maximum individual fruit was obtained compared to sole crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–822 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The equivalent yield of each fruit crop was higher in the multi-storey garden than in its sole crop.

Taxon
Fruit Cropst0
Treatment
multi-storey fruit gardene1
Outcome
equivalent yielde4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
its sole crope4

Verbatim

t0

“Different Fruit Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“Light availability for litchi, sweet orange and pine apple were about 55% less than that for the sole crop of the respective fruits and for the coconut tree as sole and in the multi-storey fruit garden”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–592 · show in text ↑
e4

“The equivalent yield of each fruit crop was higher than its sole crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–893 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The land equivalent ratio of the multi-strata fruit garden was 2.6.

Taxon
Fruit Cropst0
Outcome
land equivalent ratioe5
Value
2.6e5
Setting
multi-strata fruit gardene5

Verbatim

t0

“Different Fruit Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–55 · show in text ↑
e5

“The land equivalent ratio for multi-strata fruit garden was 2.6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–958 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum gross margin was obtained from the multi-stored fruit garden, Tk.12,47,083.19 per ha/year.

Taxon
Fruit Cropst0
Treatment
multi-stored fruit gardene6
Outcome
gross margine6
Direction
maximume6
Value
Tk.12,47,083.19 per ha/yeare6

Verbatim

t0

“Different Fruit Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–55 · show in text ↑
e6

“The maximum gross margin of Tk.12,47,083.19 per ha/year and the highest BCR of 6.79 were obtained from multi-stored fruit garden”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1088 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest benefit-cost ratio, 6.79, was obtained from the multi-stored fruit garden.

Taxon
Fruit Cropst0
Treatment
multi-stored fruit gardene6
Outcome
BCRe6
Direction
higheste6
Value
6.79e6

Verbatim

t0

“Different Fruit Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–55 · show in text ↑
e6

“The maximum gross margin of Tk.12,47,083.19 per ha/year and the highest BCR of 6.79 were obtained from multi-stored fruit garden”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1088 · show in text ↑

shade · growth · Ananas comosus (pineapple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.