Quality: postharvest · Allium sativum (garlic)

1. Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. sulfur atomPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. chitosanResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. silicate(4-)Results agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. acetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. ascorbic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. boraxResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. boron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. poly(propylene)Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. applicationPositive and negative results18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. processingPositive and negative results13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect
13. radiationPositive and negative results11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect
14. fertilizationPositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
15. coldPositive and negative results9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect
16. potassiumPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
17. heatPositive and negative results7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect
18. irrigationPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
19. otherPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
20. mulchingPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
21. phosphorusPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
22. in vitroPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
23. storageResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. nanoparticleResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
25. nitrogenResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
26. soil waterResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. sowing timeResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. densityResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
29. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
30. humidityResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
31. tillageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.