Quality: postharvest · Allium sativum (garlic)

1. chitosanResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. silicate(4-)Results agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. acetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. ascorbic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. boraxResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. boron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. poly(propylene)Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. storageResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. nanoparticleResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. nitrogenResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. soil waterResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. sowing timeResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. densityResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. humidityResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. tillageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.