application · Yield · ×Triticosecale (triticale)

Positive and negative results19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

31 claims from these papers; 3 citations between them.

Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.

How these papers cite each other

3 citations between these papers: 2 on the same side, 1 across the two sides.

Positive result
Negative result or no effect
Citation, pointing to the cited paper
Citation across the two sides
Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 15

CROP MANAGEIIENT OF nITICALE IN BELGIUM · 1996
- positive
  Growth regulator sprays improved triticale yield.
Grain yield and yield components of triticale upon application of different foliar fertilizers · 2007
- positive
  Foliar treatments significantly and positively affected grain yield, spikelet number per spike and grain number per spike in triticale.
- positive
  Foliar treatments significantly and positively affected 1000 grain weight and harvest index in triticale.
cited by 2 papers here
Effect of nitrogen and zinc fertilizing on bread-making quality of spring triticale cultivated in Notec´ valley. · 2009
- positive
  The highest yield of spring triticale grain of Kargo was obtained with 120 kg N·ha -1 and the highest foliar zinc dose, compared with lower fertilization levels.
  compared with examined lower levels of fertilization
cited by 1 paper here
Effects of seed inoculation with free living nitrogen fixing bacteria and time of nitrogen foliar application on contribution of stem reserves in grain yield, rate and effective grain filling period of Triticale. · 2016
- positive
  Azotobacter inoculation with nitrogen spraying at boot stage produced maximum effective grain filling period of 34.17 days.
- positive
  Azotobacter inoculation with nitrogen spraying at boot stage produced maximum grain weight of 0/054 gr.
The effect of production system intensity on the yield of winter triticale (x Triticosecale Wittm. ex A. Camus) cultivar Alekto. · 2017
- positive
  The 120 kg N·ha-1 system with seed dressing and two foliar fungicide treatments had significantly higher average grain yield.
Complex microelement fertilizers in technology of cultivation of spring triticale, thistle and clover pannonsky · 2018
- positive
  Seed treatment and foliar dosing with the silicon-organic fertilizer NanoKremny increased spring triticale yield by 1.51 t/ha (43.6%).
Zinc biofortification of bread wheat, triticale, and durum wheat cultivars by foliar zinc fertilization · 2019
- positive
  Foliar zinc increased triticale grain yield from 46.5 to 51.6 t ha−1.
  compared with 46.5
YIELD AND QUALITY OF SPRING TRITITICALE GRAIN WHILE USING NANOKREMNIY AND SILIPLANT IN CONDITIONS OF FOREST-STEPPE OF THE MIDDLE VOLGA REGION · 2019
- positive
  Maximum grain weight per spike of spring triticale was 1.21.3 g under seed treatment and double foliar top dressing with NanoKremniy.
- positive
  Maximum ear grain size of spring triticale was 3638 under seed treatment and double foliar top dressing with NanoKremniy.
Special features of productivity and seed quality development of winter triticale varieties under the influence of technological methods · 2020
- positive
  The combined treatments increased Zimogor seed yield up to 0.27 t/ha.
- positive
  Presowing seed treatment with foliar fertilization increased Izhevskaya 2 seed yield by 0.07-0.55 t/ha.
- positive
  Agree’s Forsazh seed treatment plus spring tillering foliar fertilization yielded 2.85 t/ha in Izhevskaya 2, 0.55t/ha above control.
  compared with control variant
Grain Yield and its Components of Triticale as Affected by Silicon Foliar Application, Nitrogen Fertilizer and Water Stress in Reproductive Phase · 2020
- positive
  Foliar silicon improved biological yield, harvest index and grain yield.
- positive
  Silicon foliar application increased grain yield by 26% under deficit irrigation.
MICROELEMENT FERTILIZERS, GROWTH REGULATORS, BACTERIAL FERTILIZERS IN THE TECHNOLOGIES OF CULTIVATION OF WINTER TRITICAL IN THE FOREST STEPPE OF THE MIDDLE VOLGA REGION · 2020
- positive
  Combined nitrogen and Poly-Feed produced 8.53 t/ha Doctrina 110 grain yield, a 20.1% increase.
Productivity of Spring Triticale under Conditions of the Southern Steppe of Ukraine · 2021
- positive
  Seed treatment, mineral fertilizer and foliar nitrogen improved ear traits and grain yield.
cites 1 paper here
MANAGING YIELD AND YIELD ATTRIBUTES OF TRITICALE IN A DEFICIT IRRIGATION SYSTEM WITH METHANOL FOLIAR APPLICATION · 2021
- positive
  Foliar 15% methanol produced maximal grain weight, biological yield, SPAD, and protein percentage.
Effects of Salinity, Vermicompost, Humic Acid and Seed Inoculation with Flavobacterim on Grain Filling of Triticale · 2021
- positive
  Vermicompost with Flavobacterim plus humic acid without salinity increased 100-grain weight and grain yield per plant.
  compared with no application of bio-fertilizers as control
- positive
  The same treatments without salinity increased the effective grain filling period by 55.11%.
  compared with no application of bio-fertilizers and humic acid
- positive
  The same treatments without salinity increased the grain filling period by 19.39.
  compared with no application of bio-fertilizers and humic acid
- positive
  The same treatments without salinity gave the maximum grain weight, 53.56% above the comparator.
  compared with no application of bio-fertilizers and humic acid
- positive
  Vermicompost with Flavobacterim plus humic acid without salinity increased plant height, ear length and grain number per spike.
  compared with no application of bio-fertilizers as control
The Influence of Sowing Rate and Foliar Fertilization on the Yield of Some Triticale Varieties in the Context of Climate Change in Northwest Romania · 2024
- positive
  Utrifun with foliar fertilizer and biostimulator at 550 seeds/m2 yielded over 4500 kg/ha more than Negoiu.
  compared with Negoiu control
- positive
  Additional foliar fertilization increased 2023 production by 884 kg/ha relative to 2022.
  compared with 2022
- negative
  Foliar fertilization decreased production in 2022 drought conditions.
cites 1 paper here

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 4

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

application · Yield · ×Triticosecale (triticale)

How these papers cite each other

Papers reporting a positive result 15

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 4

application on x Triticosecale (triticale) against other targets

application · yield on other organisms