“errors”

Claim · model-written summary

Optimizing base temperature or adding an upper threshold by growth stage did not substantially reduce errors in predicting cotton growth-stage dates.

Taxon

Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0

Treatment

Optimization of base temperature and inclusion of an upper threshold by growth stagee3

Outcome

errors in predicting date of growth stage occurrencee3

Direction

no_changeinferrede3

Qualifier

did not substantiallye3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

e3

“Optimization of base temperature and inclusion of an upper threshold by growth stage did not substantially decrease errors in predicting date of growth stage occurrence”

Claim · model-written summary

Embryo-to-seed ratio did not differ significantly between basal taxa and derived groups because the model had large standard errors.

Taxon

basal taxae0

Outcome

E:Se0

Direction

no statistically significant differencese0

Comparator

any derived groupe0

Verbatim

e0

“There were no statistically significant differences in E:S between basal taxa and any derived group due to extremely large standard errors produced by GLS models”

Claim · model-written summary

Statistical testing based on the bootstrap method showed that the mean square errors (MSE) of the predicted bud-burst dates of two models, in which the start of ontogenetic development depended on dormancy development only, did not differ significantly.

Taxon

Betula pendulaBetula pendulat0

Outcome

mean square errors (MSE)e0

Direction

did not differe0

Comparator

two modelse0

Verbatim

e0

“Statistical testing based on the bootstrap method showed that the mean square errors (MSE) of the predicted bud-burst dates of two models, in which the start of ontogenetic development depended on dormancy development only, did not differ significantly.”

t0

“Betula pendula”

Claim · model-written summary

Equivalent radiation doses produced only small differences in mitotic index, within possible dosimetry error.

Taxon

Vicia fabaVicia fabae0

Treatment

radiations of different Lete0

Outcome

mitotic indexe1

Direction

smalle1

Qualifier

hardly greater than possible errors in dosimetrye1

Comparator

equivalent dosese0

Verbatim

e0

“Vicia faba-tips treated with equivalent doses of radiations of different Let”

e1

“Differences in the mitotic index are small, hardly greater than possible errors in dosimetry”

Claim · model-written summary

Embryo-to-seed ratios did not differ significantly between basal taxa and derived groups in GLS reconstructions.

Taxon

seed plantsSpermatophytat0

Outcome

E:Se0

Direction

no statistically significant differencese0

Qualifier

extremely large standard errorse0

Comparator

basal taxa and any derived groupe0

Verbatim

e0

“There were no statistically significant differences in E:S between basal taxa and any derived group due to extremely large standard errors produced by GLS models.”

t0

“SEED PLANTS”

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fitting gave prediction accuracy similar to cultivar fitting and baseline models across splits and calibration sizes.

Taxon

almond, six apricot and six sweet cherrye1

Outcome

prediction accuracye0

Direction

failed to achieve highere0

Qualifier

across the data splits and calibration dataset sizese0

Comparator

the cultivar-fit and the baseline approache0

Verbatim

e0

“The combined-fit model failed to achieve higher prediction accuracy compared to the cultivar-fit and the baseline approach, as evidenced by similar root mean square errors across the data splits and calibration dataset sizes.”

e1

“nine almond, six apricot and six sweet cherry cultivars”