Claim · model-written summary
Genotypes did not differ in density-related decline of total plant mass or root mass.
- Taxon
- Potentilla reptans
.jpg?width=60)
Potentilla reptanst0 - Material
- Genotypese1
- Outcome
- total plant mass or root masse0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Verbatim
t0“Potentilla reptans”
e0“but not in their decrease in total plant mass or root mass”
e1“Genotypes differed in their increase in petiole investment in response to an increase in density”
Title
Genotype–density interactions in a clonal, rosette-forming plant: cost of increased height growth?
Peter J. Vermeulen; Heinjo J. During Annals of Botany 2009. doi:10.1093/aob/mcp265
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Observation Genotypes differed in density-induced petiole investment.
- Observation Total lamina area per plant did not differ significantly between densities.
- Observation Relative lamina mass did not differ significantly between densities.
- Observation Genotypes differed considerably in changes in vegetation height and petiole investment.
- Association Height and petiole investment changes were not significantly negatively correlated with total mass change.
- Association Greater mother ramet investment increase correlated with greater loss of vegetative propagation.