View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The tool increased repeatability .
Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the repeatability in results were increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1522 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Spikelet number repeatability accuracy reached ± 1.
Outcomerepeatability accuracy of spikelet number e0 Verbatim
e0 “The repeatability accuracy of spikelet number achieves ± 1. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–788 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Flower diameter had relatively high repeatability .
OutcomeFlower diameter repeatability e0 Verbatim
e0 “Flower diameter repeatability was larger,other traits were impacted by environment in different degrees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–486 t0 “Dahlia Flowers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–83 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeatability of empty seed percentage was 43.4%.
Outcomerepeatability of Pes e0 Verbatim
e0 “the repeatability of Pes was 43.4% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–471 e1 “European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–154 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeatability was low to moderate across environments.
Qualifieracross environments e4 Verbatim
t0 “Carrot (Daucus carota L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–118 e4 “We found high levels of repeatability within a growing environment, with low to moderate repeatability across environments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1011 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeatability was high within a growing environment.
Qualifierwithin a growing environment e4 Verbatim
t0 “Carrot (Daucus carota L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–118 e4 “We found high levels of repeatability within a growing environment, with low to moderate repeatability across environments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1011 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Nodal root angle had high heritability or repeatability .
Outcomeheritability (repeatability) for nodal root angle e0 Verbatim
e0 “The platform revealed extensive genetic variation and high heritability ( repeatability ) for nodal root angle. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1406 t0 “sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Clonal repeatability for pollen tube growth was 9.4%, indicating low heritability.
Outcomeclonal repeatability e0 Verbatim
e0 “the calculated clonal repeatability value of 9.4% indicates that heritability of pollen tube growth rate in this species is quite low. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–625 t0 “Oenothera organensis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–81 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeatability for manually measured tassel phenotypes was 0.85 to 0.92.
Qualifiermanually measured phenotypes e0 Verbatim
e0 “Repeatability ranged from 0.85 to 0.92 for manually measured phenotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1864–1935 e1 “maize male inflorescence ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–40 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeatability was very high for initial blooming.
Directionamazingly high e0 Verbatim
e0 “The repeatability was amazingly high in phase 1 and phase 2,but relatively low in phase 3 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–980 t0 “Cunninghamia lanceolata ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–112 Other claims from this paper (11) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.