View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeatability of duplicate lignin determinations is similar for ceramic fiber and asbestos.
Outcomerepeatability of duplicate lignin determinations e3 Verbatim
e1 “Ceramic fiber was found to be a suitable alternative to asbestos in determining the acid-insoluble lignin content of 59 forages ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–136 e2 “Blank values for ceramic fiber were less than those for asbestos ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–327 e3 “repeatability of duplicate lignin determinations was similar for both filter aids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–414 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Variation by bin position was not significantly different from variation among instruments.
OutcomeVariation with inbin position e0 Directionnot significantly different e0 Comparatorvariation between instruments e0 Verbatim
e0 “Variation with inbin position was not significantly different (. = 0.05) than the variation between instruments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1307 t0 “WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
QAMS and ESM did not differ significantly in quantifying four anthraquinone components.
Outcomequantification of the four main components e1 Directionno significant difference e1 Verbatim
e0 “in Polygonum multiflorum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–207 e1 “there was no significant difference between QAMS and ESM for quantification of the four main components by using relative error results, and the QAMS method was accurate and reliable, and had a good repeatability . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–995 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Adding vapour pressure deficit gave little or no gain in model coefficient of determination.
Outcomecoefficient of determination e0 Directionlittle to no improvement e0 Comparatora model comprising either clear-sky solar radiation or its determinants, day-of-year and hour-of-day e0 Verbatim
e0 “Adding vapour pressure deficit to a model comprising either clear-sky solar radiation or its determinants, day-of-year and hour-of-day, made little to no improvement to the coefficient of determination ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1248 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.