View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: cotton ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Association observed review summary basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
High plant density and restricted irrigation decrease nitrogen use efficiency.
High Plant density and restricted irrigation e0 Verbatim
t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 7–13 e0 “High Plant density and restricted irrigation in crease Leaf/Boll ratio (sink limitation), thereby decrease NUE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1130 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At bud stage, cotton Pn tended to decrease as planting density in creased.
planting density e6 Verbatim
t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–105 e6 “During bud stage, the Pn was relatively high under low density with even row space, and it tended to decrease with the in crease of planting density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–777 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Root length density and root weight density decrease as salinity of irrigation water and soil salt content in the root zone in crease.
an increase of salinity of irrigation water e5 root length density, and root weight density e5 Verbatim
e0 “the effects of drip irrigation underneath a plastic film with different salinities of irrigation water on soil salt content and cotton growth were studied at the Aksu National Field Research Station ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–397 e5 “Leaf area in dex, root area in dex, root length density , and root weight density all decrease with an in crease of salinity of irrigation water and soil salt content in the root zone ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1211 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing plant density reduced seed in dex and protein content.
seed index, seed protein content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “cottonseed yield and quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–105 e0 “As plant density in creased, there was a decrease in cottonseed yield/ha, seed in dex, seed protein content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–314 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
High planting density with wide-narrow row decrease d t0 of cotton.
High planting density e1 underwide-narrowrow e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–105 e1 “High planting density was beneficial to decrease t0 and in crease Vm underwide-narrowrow ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1106 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation Before full-bloom stage, LAI, SPAD and net photosynthesis rate of cotton did not differ significantly among allocation models. Observation After full-bloom stage, LAI, SPAD and net photosynthesis rate of cotton differed significantly among allocation models (the opposite of the earlier result). Observation The change of net photosynthesis rate in cotton over the growth period was parabolic. Observation Pn of cotton was higher in the outer canopy than in the lower canopy throughout the growth period. Observation At bud stage, cotton Pn was relatively high under low density with even row space. Association At bud stage, cotton Pn tended to decrease as planting density increased. Observation Cotton Pn peaked at full-bloom stage, with a highest value of 34 umol m-2 s-1 under middle density with wide-narrow row. Observation At full-boll and boll opening stages, cotton Pn was highest under high density with wide-narrow row. Intervention effect High planting density with wide-narrow row increased Vm of cotton. Observation The maximum Vm under high planting density was 269.8 kg per day. Intervention effect Vm under high planting density was 11% higher than under middle planting density. Intervention effect Vm under high planting density was 52.8% higher than under low planting density. Intervention effect Under middle and low planting density, Vm was higher with even row space than with wide-narrow row, but the opposite held under high planting density. Recommendation The authors conclude it is suitable to plant cotton at high planting density with wide-narrow row in the jujube-cotton intercropping system. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher maternal plant density decrease d emergence and offspring seedling growth of cotton.
higher maternal plant density e0 emergence and offspring seedling growth e4 lower plant density e0 Verbatim
e5 “emergence and offspring growth traits of cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–318 e0 “Seed nutrients reserves and seed mass were decrease d at higher maternal plant density relative to lower plant density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–480 e4 “with concomitant decrease in emergence and offspring seedling growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–549 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Over-irrigation decrease d root length density in wide and narrow rows.
over-irrigation e0 wide rows and narrow rows e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In conditions of over-irrigation, the root length density of cotton between mulches would in crease. However, it would decrease in both the wide rows and narrow rows. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–787 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing plant density reduced oil refractive in dex, iodine value and unsaponifiable matter.
oil refractive index, iodine value, unsaponifiable matter e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “cottonseed yield and quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–105 e0 “As plant density in creased, there was a decrease in cottonseed yield/ha, seed in dex, seed protein content, oil and protein yields/ha, oil refractive in dex, iodine value, unsaponifiable matter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–400 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing plant density reduced unsaturated fatty acids.
unsaturated fatty acids (myristoleic, oleic and linoleic) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “cottonseed yield and quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–105 e0 “As plant density in creased, there was a decrease in cottonseed yield/ha, seed in dex, seed protein content, oil and protein yields/ha, oil refractive in dex, iodine value, unsaponifiable matter and unsaturated fatty acids (myristoleic, oleic and linoleic) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–462 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
No significant decrease in photosynthesis ability of the fourth leaf or chlorophyll content was seen under 12 plants m −2 compared with 7.5 plants m −2.
fourth leave e0 12 plants m −2 e1 photosynthesis ability of the fourth leave and chlorophyll content e0 no significant decrease e1 7.5 plants m −2 e1 Verbatim
e0 “The photosynthesis ability of the fourth leave and chlorophyll content both decrease d with in creasing plant density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1727 e1 “but no significant decrease was observed under 12 plants m −2 compared to 7.5 plants m −2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1818 t0 “high density cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–101 Other claims from this paper (15) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Gossypium hirsutumt0