Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“magnitude of decrease”

3 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 2 non-evaluative

Over time

1990 2000 ’10 ’20

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Taxon: soybean ✕

Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.

Observationobservedreview summarysignificant (as stated)basis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The magnitude of the yield decrease and WUE increase under deficit irrigation depended on the stage at which stress was imposed

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome: magnitudee6
Qualifier: significantly influenced by the stage at which the stress was imposede6

Verbatim

t0
“deficit irrigation in soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–53

e6
“with a magnitude significantly influenced by the stage at which the stress was imposed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1243

Title

The state of the art on deficit irrigation in soybean

Francesco Morbidini; Wilfredo Barrera; Giampaolo Zanin; et al. Irrigation and Drainage 2023. doi:10.1002/ird.2903

Other claims from this paper (5)

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decrease in conductance-response magnitude with VPD is concluded to be due to an earlier onset of stomatal closure that terminated the pulse response.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe1
Outcome: magnitude of the integrated conductance responsee2
Qualifier: an earlier onset of stomatal closure that terminated the pulse responsee2

Verbatim

e1
“The effect of leaf-air vapor pressure difference (VPD) on the magnitude of the stomatal response to blue light was investigated in soybean (Glycine max)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–152

e2
“At 20 degrees C and 25 degrees C, the magnitude of the integrated conductance response decreased with increasing VPD (0.4 to 2.6 kiloPascals), due to an earlier onset of stomatal closure that terminated the pulse response”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–512

Title

The Magnitude of the Stomatal Response to Blue Light

Sarah M. Assmann; David A. Grantz PLANT PHYSIOLOGY 1990. doi:10.1104/pp.93.2.701

Other claims from this paper (6)

Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors state that the yield and biomass increases under elevated CO2 are consistent with SoyFACE studies but larger in magnitude.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome: yield and biomasse1
Direction: larger effectse1
Comparator: SoyFACE studiese1

Verbatim

e0
“Elevation of [CO2] will invariably influence soybean growth and yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–174

e1
“Our main conclusion is consistent with the results of SoyFACE studies,such as the increase in yield and biomass and the decrease in harvest index with elevated [CO2],but with larger effects than those found in the SoyFACE studies”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1861

Title

Effects of free air CO_2 enrichment( FACE) on growth and yield of summer soybean

Hao Xing Acta Ecologica Sinica 2009

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Elevated CO2 under FACE increased the weight of leaf, stem and pod compared with ambient CO2.
Intervention effect Under FACE, above-ground biomass of two varieties was significantly increased by about 52.30% compared with ambient air.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 increased leaf area of Zhonghuang35.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 decreased leaf area of Zhonghuang13.
Intervention effect Under FACE, specific leaf weight of two soybean cultivars increased at the filling pod stage.
Intervention effect Under FACE, specific leaf weight of Zhonghuang35 was significantly increased by 23.08%.
Intervention effect Under FACE, plant node number and branch number increased.
Intervention effect Under elevated CO2, stem diameter of Zhonghuang35 significantly increased by 7.18% at harvest.
Intervention effect Under elevated CO2, stem diameter of Zhonghuang13 significantly increased by 26.33% at harvest.
Intervention effect Under FACE, pod number per plant and individual seed mass increased, which the paper links to higher yield.
Intervention effect Under FACE, average soybean yield increased by 30.93%.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 did not significantly affect the average harvest index of soybean.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 did not significantly change the proportional allocation of leaf, stem and pod biomass to above-ground biomass over the growing season.
Observation The effect of FACE on soybean differed significantly between the two cultivars.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“magnitude of decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics