Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“magnitude of decrease”

3 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

2000 ’10 ’20

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phage pretreatment lowered the pear fire blight pathogen titre by 1–3 orders of magnitude.

Taxon: pearPyrus communise0
Treatment: treatment with a bacteriophage 1 h before infection with the pathogene1
Interactor: E. amylovoraErwinia amylovorae1pathogen
Outcome: titer of the pathogene1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 1–3 orders of magnitudee1
Qualifier: inoculum of 106 –108 CFU/mLe1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“pear flowers and leaves”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–173

e1
“a decrease in the titer of the pathogen by 1–3 orders of magnitude was shown with E. amylovora in the inoculum of 106 –108 CFU/mL and treatment with a bacteriophage 1 h before infection with the pathogen.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–560

Title

Study of the efficiency of suppressing fire blight by bacteriophages under laboratory conditions

Natalya V. Besarab; Alexander L. Lagonenko; Maria A. Letarova; et al. Experimental Biology and Biotechnology 2022. doi:10.33581/2957-5060-2022-1-59-69

Other claims from this paper (1)

Intervention effect Phage treatment one hour before inoculation did not significantly change pear fire blight symptoms versus control.

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying weed establishment decreased weed biomass.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: delay in establishmente0
Interactor: weedse0weed
Outcome: weed biomasse0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“The delay in establishment and removal of weeds resulted in weed biomass decrease and increase of the same magnitude, respectively, regardless of transplant type.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1341

t0
“Tomato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78

Title

Critical Period for Weed Control in Grafted and Nongrafted Fresh Market Tomato

Sushila Chaudhari; Katherine M. Jennings; David W. Monks; et al. Weed Science 2016. doi:10.1614/ws-d-15-00049.1

Other claims from this paper (8)

Association Later weed establishment increased tomato aboveground biomass.
Association Later weed removal decreased tomato biomass.
Intervention effect At a given weed timing, grafted tomato produced higher biomass than nongrafted tomato.
Association Delaying weed removal increased weed biomass by the same magnitude.
Method / resource The predicted critical weed-control period for grafted tomato was 2.2 to 4.5 WAT.
Method / resource The predicted critical weed-control period for nongrafted tomato was 3.3 to 5.8 WAT.
Intervention effect Grafting did not affect critical-period length of 2.3 or 2.5 weeks.
Observation Critical-period management began and ended one week earlier for grafted tomato.

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundnut pod yield per area responded linearly to decreasing sesame density, most strongly under Toshka 1.

Taxon: groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Material: Toshka 1e0
Treatment: decrease of sesame planting densitye0
Interactor: sesameSesamum indicume0weed
Outcome: pod yield / fad. of groundnute0
Direction: highere0

Verbatim

e0
“The re-sponse equations of pod yield / fad. of groundnut was linear with each decrease of sesame planting density and with higher magnitude under Toshka 1 than under the other to sesame varieties.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–2032

Title

RESPONSE OF GROUNDNUT TO INTERCROPPING WITH SOME SESAME VARIETIES UNDER DEFERENT PLANT DENSITY

Abou-Kerisha M.A.; R.A Gadallah; E.E.A. Mohamdain Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2008. doi:10.21608/ajs.2008.14938

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Intercropping with sesame decreased all studied groundnut traits relative to sole crops.
Intervention effect Groundnut trait reduction was greater with sesame Giza 32 than other sesame varieties.
Intervention effect Sesame density significantly affected groundnut yield and its components.
Intervention effect At 50% sesame density, groundnut yield exceeded yield at 100% density by 31.66% in season one.
Intervention effect At 50% sesame density, groundnut yield exceeded yield at 100% density by 27.51% in season two.
Intervention effect At 50% sesame density, groundnut yield exceeded yield at 100% density by 29.53% across seasons.
Intervention effect Intercropping decreased yield of all sesame varieties.
Observation Sesame Giza 32 surpassed Shandaweel 3 and Toshka 1 in height, branching and capsules per plant.
Observation Sesame Giza 32 surpassed Shandaweel 3 and Toshka 1 in seed yield per plant and area.
Intervention effect High sesame density produced the highest seed yield per faddan.
Observation Groundnut with low density Toshka 1 had a higher land equivalent ratio of 1.41.
Observation Groundnut with low density Toshka 1 had higher intercropping advantage of 582.8.
Observation Groundnut with low density Toshka 1 had higher monetary advantage index of 1666.85.
Observation Groundnut with low density Giza 32 had higher actual yield loss of +1.245.
Recommendation Authors favored medium density Toshka 1 intercropping for both crops growth and yield.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“magnitude of decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics