Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters

Organism names are matched through NCBI Taxonomy: “soybean” → Glycine max. Claims whose organism was placed there count as matches whatever the abstract calls it (maize, corn, Zea mays).

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing the thifensulfuron rate mixed with imazethapyr at 70 g/ha did not decrease injury in STS soybean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Material
STS soybeane1
Treatment
Reducing the thifensulfuron ratee1
Outcome
injurye1
Direction
did not decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Reducing the thifensulfuron rate mixed with imazethapyr at 70 g/ha did not decrease injury in STS soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–878

Title

Response of Sulfonylurea-Tolerant Soybean (Glycine max) and Selected Weed Species to Imazethapyr and Thifensulfuron Combinations

D. M. Simpson; E. W. Stoller Weed Technology 1995. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00023885

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazapyr did not increase soybean injury with the other herbicides.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Imazapyre0
Outcome
soybean injurye0
Direction
did not increasee0
Comparator
chlorimuron, imazaquin, or imazethapyre0

Verbatim

e0

“Imazapyr did not increase soybean injury or decrease yield provided by chlorimuron, imazaquin, or imazethapyr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1104

Title

Influence of Imazapyr on the Control of Pitted Morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) and Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) with Chlorimuron, Imazaquin, and Imazethapyr

Dennis G. Riley; David R. Shaw Weed Science 1988. doi:10.1017/s0043174500075585

Other claims from this paper (10)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean production showed no significant decrease.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
productione0
Direction
no significant decreasee0

Verbatim

e0

“There was no visual injury in soybean and no significant decrease in production and germination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1285

Title

Chemical Management of Bidens pilosa (L.) and Euphorbia heterophylla (L.) and Seed Germination in Genetically Modified Soybean Glyphosate Tolerant

André Luiz de Souza Lacerda; Edgar Gomes Ferreira de Beauclair; João Nicanildo Bastos dos Santos American Journal of BioScience 2019. doi:10.11648/j.ajbio.20190705.11

Other claims from this paper (4)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean germination showed no significant decrease.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
no significant decreasee0

Verbatim

e0

“There was no visual injury in soybean and no significant decrease in production and germination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1285

Title

Chemical Management of Bidens pilosa (L.) and Euphorbia heterophylla (L.) and Seed Germination in Genetically Modified Soybean Glyphosate Tolerant

André Luiz de Souza Lacerda; Edgar Gomes Ferreira de Beauclair; João Nicanildo Bastos dos Santos American Journal of BioScience 2019. doi:10.11648/j.ajbio.20190705.11

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazapyr did not decrease soybean yield with the other herbicides.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Imazapyre0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not increasee0
Comparator
chlorimuron, imazaquin, or imazethapyre0

Verbatim

e0

“Imazapyr did not increase soybean injury or decrease yield provided by chlorimuron, imazaquin, or imazethapyr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1104

Title

Influence of Imazapyr on the Control of Pitted Morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) and Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) with Chlorimuron, Imazaquin, and Imazethapyr

Dennis G. Riley; David R. Shaw Weed Science 1988. doi:10.1017/s0043174500075585

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr applied PRE in soybean did not reduce oilseed radish stand density or biomass.

Taxon
oilseed radishe0
Treatment
imazethapyr applied PREe2
Outcome
stand density and biomasse4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“effect of residual herbicides on oilseed radish (Raphanus sativus L.) establishment and growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–357
e2

“imazethapyr applied PRE caused 43 and 48% oilseed radish injury at 14 and 28 DAE, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–909
e4

“There was no decrease in oilseed radish stand density and biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–976

Title

Effect of soybean and winter wheat herbicides on oilseed radish establishment and growth

Taïga B Cholette; Nader Soltani; David C. Hooker; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 2017. doi:10.1139/cjps-2017-0023

Other claims from this paper (5)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.