Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“Si effect”

1,736 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 347 non-evaluative

Over time

1970 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si alone had little effect on sugar production.

Taxon: Sugarcanet0
Treatment: Sie0
Outcome: sugare0
Direction: little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Si had little effect on sugar as a lone entity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2473–2519

t0
“Sugarcane”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9

Title

Sugarcane Flower-Control Studies With Paraquat, Gibberellic Acid, and Sodium Meta-Silicate

Alex G. Alexander; R. Montalvo Zapata; Gene L. Spain; et al. The Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico 1972. doi:10.46429/jaupr.v56i3.10826

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect GA alone reduced sugarcane flowering rates to 0.02 percent.
Intervention effect Paraquat reduced flowering to about one-third of control levels.
Intervention effect Si alone had no effect on flowering.
Intervention effect Si reduced the flowering-control effectiveness of GA when combined.
Intervention effect GA increased total green weight, stalk weight, and internode length.
Intervention effect Paraquat decreased total green weight, stalk weight, and internode length.
Intervention effect Si alone appeared to increase green and stalk weights, without statistical significance.
Intervention effect Si reduced GA growth stimulation.
Intervention effect Si lessened Paraquat growth suppression.
Intervention effect GA increased sugar production.
Intervention effect Paraquat decreased sugar production.
Intervention effect Paraquat lessened the degree and duration of positive GA effects.
Intervention effect Si buffered extremes in sugar production.
Observation Early Paraquat leaf injury appeared more than compensated after about two months.
Observation Tonnage losses from Paraquat foliar injury appeared permanent.
Observation GA growth stimulation was followed by below-normal growth.
Mechanism The later growth decline reduced the total growth increase achievable with GA.
Recommendation The authors proposed delayed Si application after GA to lessen growth decline.
Recommendation The authors concluded that stimulating the apical meristem may prevent flowering more effectively than destroying foliage.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Mn effect depended on Si concentration.

Taxon: RICEOryza sativat0
Treatment: Mne0
Outcome: effect of Mne0
Qualifier: level of Si concentratione0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“the effect of Mn was depended on the level of Si concentration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1441

t0
“RICE”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53

Title

THE EFFECT OF SILICA AND MANGANESE APLICATION ON RICE GROWTH AND YIELD

Paul Benyamin Timotiwu; Maya Maeistia Dewi AGRIVITA Journal of Agricultural Science 2014. doi:10.17503/agrivita-2014-36-2-p182-188

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Increasing Si raised leaf greenness.
Intervention effect Increasing Si raised productive tillers, dry matter and filled grains.
Intervention effect Increasing Si decreased tiller angle and empty grains.
Intervention effect Mn application increased rice growth and yield.
Intervention effect Mn application increased tiller angle and empty grains.
Intervention effect Mn with increasing Si raised rice growth and yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon application had no effect on onion Si concentrations.

Taxon: onionsAllium cepae0
Treatment: Sie0
Outcome: Si concentrationse0
Direction: no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Application of Si had no effect on DM yield or Si concentrations in onions, but there was a 45% decrease in Cd concentrations in the onion bulb.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–727

Title

Mitigating Cadmium Accumulation in Spinach and Onions by the Application of Silicon Fertilizer to Soil

Colin William Gray; Bridget Elizabeth Wise Soil and Sediment Contamination An International Journal 2020. doi:10.1080/15320383.2020.1747980

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Silicon application had increased on spinach dry matter (DM) yield in spinach.
Intervention effect Silicon application had increased on Si concentrations in spinach.
Intervention effect Silicon application had no effect on plant Cd concentrations in spinach.
Intervention effect Silicon application had no effect on uptake in spinach.
Intervention effect Silicon application had no effect on onion DM yield.
Intervention effect Silicon application had decrease on onion Cd concentrations in the onion bulb.
Intervention effect Silicon application had no effect on calcium nitrate-extractable soil Cd.
Mechanism The authors proposed that silicon restricted cadmium movement from onion roots to harvestable tissue.
Recommendation The authors suggest silicon as a possible tool to reduce plant cadmium uptake.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si fertilizer had no evident yield effect in fine sand soil.

Taxon: balsam pearMomordica charantiat0
Treatment: Sie0
Outcome: Yieldt1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0
“no evident effect with application of Mo and Si fertilizers”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–310

t0
“balsam pear”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 51–62

t1
“Yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90

Title

Effect of Copper, Molybdenum, Silicon Nutrition on Balsam Pear (Momordica charantia) Yield and Quality

Liao Xin-rong 2007

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Cu fertilizer significantly affected yield in fine sand soil.
Intervention effect Mo fertilizer had no evident yield effect in fine sand soil.
Intervention effect Cu fertilizer did not significantly affect yield in silt loam.
Intervention effect Mo fertilizer did not significantly affect yield in silt loam.
Intervention effect Si fertilizer increased yield in silt loam.
Intervention effect Cu fertilizer reduced nitrate nitrogen content by 19.15% ~ 43.35%.
Intervention effect Mo fertilizer reduced nitrate nitrogen content by 19.15% ~ 43.35%.
Intervention effect Si fertilizer had no evident effect on nitrate nitrogen in fine sand soil.
Intervention effect Cu fertilizer decreased nitrate nitrogen in silt loam.
Intervention effect Mo fertilizer decreased nitrate nitrogen in silt loam.
Intervention effect Si fertilizer decreased nitrate nitrogen in silt loam.
Intervention effect Micronutrient fertilizer did not significantly change vitamin C content in either soil.
Intervention effect Cu fertilizer increased water-soluble sugar in both soils.
Intervention effect Mo fertilizer increased water-soluble sugar in both soils.
Observation Water-soluble sugar increased by 85.40% ~ 148.68% in fine sand soil.
Observation Water-soluble sugar increased by 27.72% ~ 65.31% in silt loam soil.
Intervention effect Si fertilizer significantly decreased sugar content in silt loam.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic matter and Si liquid fertilizer interacted significantly in their effect on sugarcane Si and N absorption, stem length, yield and rendement.

Taxon: sugar canee0
Treatment: organic matter and Si liquid fertilizere0
Outcome: Si and N absorption, length of stem, yield and rendemente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0
“interaction between organic matter and Si liquid fertilizer significantly affected on Si and N absorption, length of stem, yield and rendement of sugar cane.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1451

Title

Effect of organic matter and Si liquid fertilizer on growth and yield of sugar cane

Djajadi Djajadi; Sulis Nur Hidayati; Dwi Syaputra Berkala Penelitian Hayati 2017. doi:10.23869/bphjbr.22.1.20165

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Manure followed by 30% Si liquid fertilizer gave the highest Si absorption of 869 g SiO2/plant.
Intervention effect The same treatment gave the highest N absorption of 720 g N/plant.
Intervention effect The same treatment gave the highest cane yield of 155.74 tons/ha.
Intervention effect The same treatment gave the highest rendement of 8.15%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Si+Mn treatment had a better effect on rice growth than sole Si or sole Mn.

Taxon: Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment: Si+Mn treatmente2
Outcome: effect on rice growthe3
Direction: bettere3
Comparator: sole Si or Mne3

Verbatim

t0
“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–85

e2
“The Si+Mn treatment had a higher plant height, lower number of oranging leaves anda 25.0% higher rice yield than CK”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–962

e3
“showed a better effect on rice growth than the treatment of sole Si or Mn”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 967–1039

Title

Combined Application of Si and Mn for Correcting FeToxicity to Rice (Oryza sativa L.) on a Red Earth

Zhongwen Liao 土壤圈(英文版) 1994

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Combined Si and Mn application increased water-soluble Si and Mn.
Intervention effect Combined Si and Mn application reduced water-soluble Fe, favouring correction of Fe toxicity.
Intervention effect Combined Si and Mn application could reduce leaf orange in rice.
Intervention effect Combined Si and Mn application could improve rice growth.
Intervention effect The Si+Mn treatment gave a higher plant height than CK.
Intervention effect The Si+Mn treatment gave a lower number of oranging leaves than CK.
Intervention effect The Si+Mn treatment gave a 25.0% higher rice yield than CK.
Intervention effect Electron probe showed obvious differences in Si, Fe, Mn and Ca in rice roots between CK and the other three treatments.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping had no significant effect on soil available Si, ammonium N or nitrate N.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: Intercroppinge0
Outcome: available Si, ammonium N and nitrate N content in soile0
Direction: no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Si, N nutrition of rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–55

e0
“Intercropping had no significant effect on available Si, ammonium N and nitrate N content in soil”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1560

Title

[Interspecific relationship and Si, N nutrition of rice in rice-water spinach intercropping system.]

Chuan Chuan Ning; Rong Shuang Yang; Mao Xia Cai; et al. PubMed 2017. doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201702.015

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect The 2:2 intercropping ratio increased rice yield by 77.5%-120.6%.
Intervention effect The 3:2 ratio increased rice yield by 64.9%-80.9%.
Intervention effect The 4:2 ratio increased rice yield by 37.7%-56.0%.
Intervention effect Intercropping reduced water spinach yield.
Intervention effect Intercropping significantly increased combined rice and water spinach yield.
Observation Land equivalent ratios exceeded 1.0, with the 3:2 ratio performing best.
Association Rice was more competitive than water spinach, especially early in the season.
Intervention effect Intercropping increased Si absorption in rice leaves relative to monoculture.
Intervention effect Intercropping increased N absorption in rice leaves relative to monoculture.
Observation Intercropping increased rice leaf Si content during ripening.
Intervention effect Intercropping did not increase rice leaf N content and slightly reduced it during ripening.
Observation Water spinach monoculture had the highest soil available Si, ammonium N and nitrate N.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si alone had no effect on flowering.

Taxon: Sugarcanet0
Treatment: Sie0
Outcome: floweringe1
Direction: no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Si had no effect by itself”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1806–1832

e1
“GA given alone was the most effective treatment, reducing flowering rates to 0.02 percent”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1739

t0
“Sugarcane”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9

Title

Sugarcane Flower-Control Studies With Paraquat, Gibberellic Acid, and Sodium Meta-Silicate

Alex G. Alexander; R. Montalvo Zapata; Gene L. Spain; et al. The Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico 1972. doi:10.46429/jaupr.v56i3.10826

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect GA alone reduced sugarcane flowering rates to 0.02 percent.
Intervention effect Paraquat reduced flowering to about one-third of control levels.
Intervention effect Si reduced the flowering-control effectiveness of GA when combined.
Intervention effect GA increased total green weight, stalk weight, and internode length.
Intervention effect Paraquat decreased total green weight, stalk weight, and internode length.
Intervention effect Si alone appeared to increase green and stalk weights, without statistical significance.
Intervention effect Si reduced GA growth stimulation.
Intervention effect Si lessened Paraquat growth suppression.
Intervention effect GA increased sugar production.
Intervention effect Paraquat decreased sugar production.
Intervention effect Paraquat lessened the degree and duration of positive GA effects.
Intervention effect Si alone had little effect on sugar production.
Intervention effect Si buffered extremes in sugar production.
Observation Early Paraquat leaf injury appeared more than compensated after about two months.
Observation Tonnage losses from Paraquat foliar injury appeared permanent.
Observation GA growth stimulation was followed by below-normal growth.
Mechanism The later growth decline reduced the total growth increase achievable with GA.
Recommendation The authors proposed delayed Si application after GA to lessen growth decline.
Recommendation The authors concluded that stimulating the apical meristem may prevent flowering more effectively than destroying foliage.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of Si on total soluble solids of cucumber fruit varied with growth stage and Si concentration.

Taxon: Cucumis sativus L.Cucumis sativust0
Treatment: Sie0
Outcome: total soluble solidse0
Qualifier: varied depending on growth stage and concentration of Sie0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0
“Cucumis sativus L.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–82

e0
“the effects of Si on total soluble solids varied depending on growth stage and concentration of Si”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–894

Title

Silicon supplements affect yield and fruit quality of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) grown in net houses

Abd-Alkarim Emad; Bayoumi Yousry; Metwally Elmahdy; et al. African Journal of Agricultural Research 2017. doi:10.5897/ajar2017.12484

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect All Si treatments produced higher early and marketable cucumber fruit yield (number and weight) in both years.
Intervention effect Si application significantly increased cucumber fruit firmness at all growth stages.
Intervention effect Treatments differed significantly in cucumber fruit ascorbic acid content in 2013 but not in 2014.
Intervention effect Si-treated cucumber plants had more Si in leaves and fruits than untreated controls.
Intervention effect Si-treated cucumber plants had more phosphorus and potassium in the leaves than untreated controls.
Recommendation The authors conclude that both foliar sprays and soil drenches of Si have the potential to increase cucumber yield and fruit quality in net house production.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Westar generally had a negative effect on SI expression.

Taxon: B. napusBrassica napuse0
Material: ‘Westar’e0
Outcome: SI expressione0
Direction: negative effecte0

Verbatim

e0
“The B. napus Canadian cultivar ‘Westar’ generally had a negative effect on SI expression”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1011

Title

Development of self‐incompatible Brassica napus: (III) B. napus genotype effects on S‐allele expression

V. L. Ripley; W. D. Beversdorf Plant Breeding 2003. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0523.2003.00782.x

Other claims from this paper (4)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“Si effect”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics