Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The Si+Mn treatment had a better effect on rice growth than sole Si or sole Mn.

A claim from Combined Application of Si and Mn for Correcting FeToxicity to Rice (Oryza sativa L.) on a Red Earth · 1994

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Si+Mn treatment had a better effect on rice growth than sole Si or sole Mn.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
Si+Mn treatmente2
Outcome
effect on rice growthe3
Direction
bettere3
Comparator
sole Si or Mne3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–85
e2

“The Si+Mn treatment had a higher plant height, lower number of oranging leaves anda 25.0% higher rice yield than CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–962
e3

“showed a better effect on rice growth than the treatment of sole Si or Mn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 967–1039

Title

Combined Application of Si and Mn for Correcting FeToxicity to Rice (Oryza sativa L.) on a Red Earth

Zhongwen Liao 土壤圈(英文版) 1994

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-b436c2d710d9cab78136b85416f3cabfdf2fee50a524d0603d8ccc0b0c6a70f7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

manganese atom · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

26 papers: 16 positive, 10 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

silicon atom · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

171 papers: 157 positive, 14 negative or no effect

156 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

162 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.