Paper · 1968 · Agronomy Journal

Nutrient Uptake by Lowland Rice Under Flooded and Nonflooded Soil Conditions1

E. C. Cherian; Gary M. Paulsen; Larry S. Murphy

17
claims
25
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Lowland rice ( Oryzea sativa L.) produced more foliage and usually adsorbed more P and Mn from flooded soil than from nonflooded soil. Flooding, however, decreased the contents of Ca and Mg, and frequently the contents of K and Zn, in rice foliage. The responses of Fe and Cu contents of rice foliage to flooding varied. Prosphorus fertilization increased the growth of rice and caused similar levels of phosphorus to accumulate in the foliage under flooded and nonflooded conditions. Super phosphate and liquid ammonium polyphosphate were more effective sources than solid ammonium polyphosphate under flooded conditions, but there was little difference among sources under nonflooded conditions. The highest P rate (100 ppm) produced most rice growth under flooded conditions while, under nonflooded conditions, the medium P rate (50 ppm) was as effective. Managanese fertilizer increased the Mn content of rice foliage only when applied at extremely high rates (50 ppm) and there was little difference between Mn contents of flooded and nonflooded plants at the higher Mn rates. Neither Mn nor Fe fertilizers affected rice growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding produced more rice foliage.

Taxon
Lowland ricee0
Treatment
flooded soile0
Outcome
foliagee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
nonflooded soile0

Verbatim

e0

“Lowland rice ( Oryzea sativa L.) produced more foliage and usually adsorbed more P and Mn from flooded soil than from nonflooded soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding usually increased rice P uptake.

Treatment
flooded soile0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
nonflooded soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“usually adsorbed more P and Mn from flooded soil than from nonflooded soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–142 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nutrient Uptake by Lowland Rice Under Flooded and Nonflooded Soil Conditions1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding usually increased rice Mn uptake.

Treatment
flooded soile0
Outcome
Mne0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
nonflooded soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“usually adsorbed more P and Mn from flooded soil than from nonflooded soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–142 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nutrient Uptake by Lowland Rice Under Flooded and Nonflooded Soil Conditions1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding decreased rice foliage Ca and Mg contents.

Organ / stage
foliagee0
Treatment
Floodinge0
Outcome
contents of Ca and Mge0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flooding, however, decreased the contents of Ca and Mg, and frequently the contents of K and Zn, in rice foliage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–257 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding frequently decreased rice foliage K and Zn contents.

Organ / stage
foliagee0
Treatment
Floodinge0
Outcome
contents of K and Zne0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flooding, however, decreased the contents of Ca and Mg, and frequently the contents of K and Zn, in rice foliage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–257 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice foliage Fe and Cu content responses to flooding varied.

Treatment
floodinge0
Outcome
Fe and Cu contents of rice foliagee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The responses of Fe and Cu contents of rice foliage to flooding varied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus fertilization increased rice growth.

Treatment
Prosphorus fertilizatione0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prosphorus fertilization increased the growth of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–383 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus fertilization gave similar foliage phosphorus levels under flooded and nonflooded conditions.

Organ / stage
foliagee0
Treatment
Prosphorus fertilizatione0
Outcome
levels of phosphoruse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
nonflooded conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prosphorus fertilization increased the growth of rice and caused similar levels of phosphorus to accumulate in the foliage under flooded and nonflooded conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–492 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nutrient Uptake by Lowland Rice Under Flooded and Nonflooded Soil Conditions1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Super phosphate was more effective than solid ammonium polyphosphate under flooding.

Treatment
Super phosphatee0
Outcome
more effective sourcese0
Direction
more effectivee0
Qualifier
under flooded conditionse0
Comparator
solid ammonium polyphosphatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Super phosphate and liquid ammonium polyphosphate were more effective sources than solid ammonium polyphosphate under flooded conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–630 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nutrient Uptake by Lowland Rice Under Flooded and Nonflooded Soil Conditions1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid ammonium polyphosphate was more effective than solid ammonium polyphosphate under flooding.

Treatment
liquid ammonium polyphosphatee0
Outcome
more effective sourcese0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
solid ammonium polyphosphatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Super phosphate and liquid ammonium polyphosphate were more effective sources than solid ammonium polyphosphate under flooded conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–630 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nutrient Uptake by Lowland Rice Under Flooded and Nonflooded Soil Conditions1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer sources differed little under nonflooded conditions.

Treatment
sourcese0
Outcome
difference among sourcese0
Direction
little differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was little difference among sources under nonflooded conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nutrient Uptake by Lowland Rice Under Flooded and Nonflooded Soil Conditions1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under flooding, 100 ppm P produced most rice growth.

Treatment
highest P rate (100 ppm)e0
Outcome
rice growthe0
Direction
moste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest P rate (100 ppm) produced most rice growth under flooded conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under nonflooding, 50 ppm P was as effective as the high rate.

Treatment
medium P rate (50 ppm)e0
Outcome
as effectivee0
Direction
as effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under nonflooded conditions, the medium P rate (50 ppm) was as effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nutrient Uptake by Lowland Rice Under Flooded and Nonflooded Soil Conditions1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mn fertilizer increased foliage Mn only at 50 ppm.

Treatment
Managanese fertilizere0
Outcome
Mn content of rice foliagee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
extremely high rates (50 ppm)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Managanese fertilizer increased the Mn content of rice foliage only when applied at extremely high rates (50 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At higher Mn rates, foliage Mn differed little between flooded and nonflooded plants.

Treatment
floodede0
Outcome
Mn contentse0
Direction
little differencee0
Comparator
nonflooded plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was little difference between Mn contents of flooded and nonflooded plants at the higher Mn rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nutrient Uptake by Lowland Rice Under Flooded and Nonflooded Soil Conditions1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mn fertilizer did not affect rice growth.

Treatment
Mne0
Outcome
rice growthe0
Direction
Neithere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither Mn nor Fe fertilizers affected rice growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe fertilizer did not affect rice growth.

Treatment
Fe fertilizerse0
Outcome
rice growthe0
Direction
Neithere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither Mn nor Fe fertilizers affected rice growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1141 · show in text ↑

manganese atom · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

26 papers: 16 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

iron atom · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

62 papers: 36 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

flooding · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 42 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 133 positive, 33 negative or no effect

132 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

fertilization · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

759 papers: 670 positive, 89 negative or no effect

669 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

755 papers more in this group

See all 759 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.