Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“magnitude of decrease”

4 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 2 non-evaluative

Over time

2000 ’10

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Taxon: tomato ✕

Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The magnitude of PN decrease with gs reduction varied across four cultivars.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
Outcome: PN decreasee0
Direction: variede0
Comparator: gs reductionse0

Verbatim

e0
“Magnitude of PN decrease accompanying gs reductions varied in the four cultivars.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–999

e1
“four cultivars of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–147

Title

Tolerance to Water Stress in Tomato Cultivars

N.K. Srinivasa Rao; R.M. Bhatt; A.T. Sadashiva Photosynthetica 2000. doi:10.1023/a:1010902427231

Other claims from this paper (11)

Observation Osmotic adjustment was highest in Arka Meghali, followed by RFS-1.
Observation Crop water stress index was lowest in Arka Meghali.
Observation Crop water stress index was highest in Pusa Ruby.
Intervention effect Water stress significantly reduced stomatal conductance, transpiration, and net photosynthesis in all cultivars.
Intervention effect Arka Saurabh had a maximum transpiration reduction of 62.4% at fruiting.
Intervention effect Pusa Ruby had a maximum net photosynthesis reduction of 53.1% at flowering.
Observation Arka Meghali had the maximum net photosynthetic rate under water stress.
Association Internal CO2 concentration did not track the decrease in stomatal conductance.
Mechanism The lack of matching Ci and gs declines may indicate mesophyll limitation to photosynthesis.
Observation Arka Meghali had the highest gas exchange efficiency under water deficits.
Recommendation Arka Meghali was recommended for rainfed cultivation.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying weed removal increased weed biomass by the same magnitude.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: removal of weedse0
Interactor: weedse0weed
Outcome: weed biomasse0
Direction: increasee0

Verbatim

e0
“The delay in establishment and removal of weeds resulted in weed biomass decrease and increase of the same magnitude, respectively, regardless of transplant type.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1341

t0
“Tomato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78

Title

Critical Period for Weed Control in Grafted and Nongrafted Fresh Market Tomato

Sushila Chaudhari; Katherine M. Jennings; David W. Monks; et al. Weed Science 2016. doi:10.1614/ws-d-15-00049.1

Other claims from this paper (8)

Association Later weed establishment increased tomato aboveground biomass.
Association Later weed removal decreased tomato biomass.
Intervention effect At a given weed timing, grafted tomato produced higher biomass than nongrafted tomato.
Association Delaying weed establishment decreased weed biomass.
Method / resource The predicted critical weed-control period for grafted tomato was 2.2 to 4.5 WAT.
Method / resource The predicted critical weed-control period for nongrafted tomato was 3.3 to 5.8 WAT.
Intervention effect Grafting did not affect critical-period length of 2.3 or 2.5 weeks.
Observation Critical-period management began and ended one week earlier for grafted tomato.

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying weed establishment decreased weed biomass.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: delay in establishmente0
Interactor: weedse0weed
Outcome: weed biomasse0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“The delay in establishment and removal of weeds resulted in weed biomass decrease and increase of the same magnitude, respectively, regardless of transplant type.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1341

t0
“Tomato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78

Title

Critical Period for Weed Control in Grafted and Nongrafted Fresh Market Tomato

Sushila Chaudhari; Katherine M. Jennings; David W. Monks; et al. Weed Science 2016. doi:10.1614/ws-d-15-00049.1

Other claims from this paper (8)

Association Later weed establishment increased tomato aboveground biomass.
Association Later weed removal decreased tomato biomass.
Intervention effect At a given weed timing, grafted tomato produced higher biomass than nongrafted tomato.
Association Delaying weed removal increased weed biomass by the same magnitude.
Method / resource The predicted critical weed-control period for grafted tomato was 2.2 to 4.5 WAT.
Method / resource The predicted critical weed-control period for nongrafted tomato was 3.3 to 5.8 WAT.
Intervention effect Grafting did not affect critical-period length of 2.3 or 2.5 weeks.
Observation Critical-period management began and ended one week earlier for grafted tomato.

Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal irrigation depth for tomato decreased by 5.51 mm.decade-1.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
Outcome: seasonal irrigation depthe0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 5.51 mm.decade-1e0
Setting: Calabriae0

Verbatim

e0
“There was a slight decrease in the seasonal irrigation depth for both citrus and tomato. The average annual magnitude of decreases throughout Calabria were 2.40 and 5.51 mm.decade-1 for citrus and tomato, respectively, corresponding to -7% and -11% of the mean irrigation depth of the period considered”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1414

Title

Effects of Climate Change on the Irrigation Scheduling Parameters in Calabria (South Italy) during 1925-2013

Capra A; Mannino R Irrigation & Drainage Systems Engineering 2015. doi:10.4172/2168-9768.s1-003

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observation Reference evapotranspiration tended to decrease by -5.51 mm.decade-1.
Observation Seasonal irrigation depth for citrus decreased by 2.40 mm.decade-1.
Observation Citrus irrigation depth declined by -7% of the period mean.
Observation Tomato irrigation depth declined by -11% of the period mean.
Observation Annual precipitation decreased while summer precipitation increased.
Association Summer precipitation advanced the last watering date and shortened the irrigation season.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“magnitude of decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics