View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The planter had a lower miss index and multiple index .
Outcomemiss index and multiple index e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “lower miss index and multiple index were also recorded. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1322 t0 “vegetables ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–57 Other claims from this paper (1) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Miss index rose 11.62% for one planter.
Outcomemiss index (MISS) e0 Verbatim
e0 “increase in the miss index ( MISS ) by 11.62% and 9.70% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–665 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 Other claims from this paper (13) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Miss index rose 9.70% for the other planter.
Outcomemiss index (MISS) e0 Verbatim
e0 “increase in the miss index ( MISS ) by 11.62% and 9.70% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–665 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 Other claims from this paper (13) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Cane diameter increased miss index .
Comparatorcane diameter e0 Verbatim
e0 “cane diameter varies directly with miss index ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1273 t0 “Sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–52 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At optimal speed, the planter miss index was 20.8%.
Verbatim
e0 “miss index of 20.8%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1553 t0 “Sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–52 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At the reported device settings, miss index was 0.67%.
Verbatim
e0 “the miss index was 0.67% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–717 t0 “Seed Potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–85 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Miss index was below 3%.
Verbatim
e0 “the miss index is less than 3% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1620 t0 “Panax notoginseng ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–111 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Miss Index varied between 0-12.5%.
Verbatim
t0 “Groundnut Planter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–85 e0 “The Multiple Index and Miss Index varied between 2.5-12.5% and 0-12.5%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–834 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Operational speed increased machine capacity and miss index .
Outcomemachine capacity and miss index e0 Comparatoroperational speed e0 Verbatim
e0 “the operational speed of the machine varies directly with machine capacity and miss index . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1221 t0 “Sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–52 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The planter miss index was 12.23 percent.
Verbatim
t0 “GARLIC CLOVE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–56 e0 “Also, miss index , multiple index and seed damage were measured as 12.23, 2.43 and 1.41 percent, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1187 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.