View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
41 B sapling development ranged from 46.2% to 80.0%.
Outcomesapling development potential e0 Verbatim
e0 “variable sapling development potential, ranging from 46.2% to 80.0% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1344 t0 “Local Grapevine Varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–48 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Container size significantly affected sapling growth and development .
Treatmentcontainer size e0 Outcomegrowth and development e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Significant effect of container size on the growth and development of P.lotungensis sapling s was also observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–502 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
GM11 significantly improved citrus sapling growth and development .
Outcomegrowth and development e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the growing substrate GM11 significantly improved the growth and development of citrus sapling s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–865 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Omega grafting reduced sapling development compared with V grafting, leaving plants weak and without lateral shoots.
Treatmentomega grafting e3 Outcomesapling development e3 Qualifierplants were weak developed, without lateral shoots e5 ComparatorV grafted saplings e4 Verbatim
t0 “Apple (Malus domestica , Borkh.) and Pear (Pyrus communis , L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–112 e3 “sapling development was reduced at combination with omega grafting technique ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1328 e4 “in V grafted sapling s the development was more intense with numerous lateral shoots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1472 e5 “plants were weak developed, without lateral shoots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1380 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
V grafting made sapling development more intense, with numerous lateral shoots, than omega grafting.
Comparatoromega grafting e3 Verbatim
t0 “Apple (Malus domestica , Borkh.) and Pear (Pyrus communis , L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–112 e3 “sapling development was reduced at combination with omega grafting technique ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1328 e4 “in V grafted sapling s the development was more intense with numerous lateral shoots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1472 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
On June 25 and July 15, sapling numbers showed a similar runner-group ranking.
Directionsimilar tendency e0 QualifierJune $25^{th}$ and July $15^{th}$ e0 Verbatim
e0 “observation on June $25^{th}$ and July $15^{th}$ showed a similar tendency for sapling numbers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–505 t0 “Strawberries ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sapling numbers did not differ significantly between the 7-8 and 9-10 runner groups.
Materialgroups with 7-8 and 9-10 runners e0 Directionno significant difference e0 Verbatim
e0 “no significant difference was detected between groups with 7-8 and 9-10 runners ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–586 e1 “sapling numbers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–505 t0 “Strawberries ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Intercropped soil improved seedling biomass and root development in pots.
Treatmentintercropped soil e0 Outcomeseedling biomass and root development e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “pot experiments showed improved seedling biomass and root development in intercropped soil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1021 t0 “apple sapling ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–45 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Sapling fresh weight decreased as runner number increased.
Outcomefresh weight of saplings e0 Qualifiernumber of runners increased e0 Not reported Material
Verbatim
e0 “The fresh weight of sapling s decreased as the number of runners increased. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1359 t0 “Strawberries ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The Deveci cultivar showed good compatibility with all rootstocks owing to higher graft success and sapling performance.
Outcomegood compatibility with all rootstocks e0 Verbatim
e0 “‘Deveci’ cultivar shows good compatibility with all rootstocks due to the higher graft success and sapling performance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1713 t0 “Pear ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–111 Other claims from this paper (12) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.