Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

41 B sapling development ranged from 46.2% to 80.0%.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Outcome
sapling development potentiale0
Value
46.2% to 80.0%e0

Verbatim

e0

“variable sapling development potential, ranging from 46.2% to 80.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1344
t0

“Local Grapevine Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–48

Title

Graft Compatibility of Local Grapevine Varieties with Grapevine Rootstocks in Yozgat Province

Selda Daler; Tuğba Kılıç; Harlene Hatterman-Valenti; et al. Horticulturae 2025. doi:10.3390/horticulturae11070803

Other claims from this paper (13)
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Container size significantly affected sapling growth and development.

Taxon
P.lotungensisMagnolia lotungensise0
Treatment
container sizee0
Outcome
growth and developmente0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Significant effect of container size on the growth and development of P.lotungensis saplings was also observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–502

Title

Cultivation Technique for Container Saplings of Parakmeria lotungensis

Yuan Dong-ming; Lin Lei; Yan ChunFeng Zhejiang linye keji 2010

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GM11 significantly improved citrus sapling growth and development.

Taxon
citrusCitruse0
Treatment
GM11e0
Outcome
growth and developmente0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the growing substrate GM11 significantly improved the growth and development of citrus saplings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–865

Title

Effect of Organically Amended Growing Substrates on the Growth and Physiological Attributes of Citrus Plants

Mazhar Abbas; Muhammad Aftab; Muhammad Zafar-ul-Hye; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2015. doi:10.1080/00103624.2015.1059846

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omega grafting reduced sapling development compared with V grafting, leaving plants weak and without lateral shoots.

Taxon
Apple (Malus domestica, Borkh.) and Pear (Pyrus communis, L.)Malus domesticaPyrus communist0
Treatment
omega graftinge3
Outcome
sapling developmente3
Direction
reducede3
Qualifier
plants were weak developed, without lateral shootse5
Comparator
V grafted saplingse4

Verbatim

t0

“Apple (Malus domestica, Borkh.) and Pear (Pyrus communis, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–112
e3

“sapling development was reduced at combination with omega grafting technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1328
e4

“in V grafted saplings the development was more intense with numerous lateral shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1472
e5

“plants were weak developed, without lateral shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1380

Title

Comparative Study of Two Bench Grafting Methods at Apple (Malus domestica, Borkh.) and Pear (Pyrus communis, L.)

Zsolt Jakab-Ilyefalvi; Angela Festila; I. Platon Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca Horticulture 2013. doi:10.15835/buasvmcn-hort:9521

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V grafting made sapling development more intense, with numerous lateral shoots, than omega grafting.

Taxon
Apple (Malus domestica, Borkh.) and Pear (Pyrus communis, L.)Malus domesticaPyrus communist0
Treatment
V graftede4
Outcome
developmente4
Direction
more intensee4
Comparator
omega graftinge3

Verbatim

t0

“Apple (Malus domestica, Borkh.) and Pear (Pyrus communis, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–112
e3

“sapling development was reduced at combination with omega grafting technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1328
e4

“in V grafted saplings the development was more intense with numerous lateral shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1472

Title

Comparative Study of Two Bench Grafting Methods at Apple (Malus domestica, Borkh.) and Pear (Pyrus communis, L.)

Zsolt Jakab-Ilyefalvi; Angela Festila; I. Platon Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca Horticulture 2013. doi:10.15835/buasvmcn-hort:9521

Other claims from this paper (7)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On June 25 and July 15, sapling numbers showed a similar runner-group ranking.

Taxon
StrawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
sapling numberse0
Direction
similar tendencye0
Qualifier
June $25^{th}$ and July $15^{th}$e0

Verbatim

e0

“observation on June $25^{th}$ and July $15^{th}$ showed a similar tendency for sapling numbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–505
t0

“Strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74

Title

Impact of Runner Development of Mother Plants during Seedling Strawberries on Daughter Plants Growth and Development during Phase of First Cluster

Gab-Soon Park; Seoung-Won Ann Journal of Environmental Science International 2016. doi:10.5322/jesi.2016.25.1.147

Other claims from this paper (14)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sapling numbers did not differ significantly between the 7-8 and 9-10 runner groups.

Taxon
StrawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
groups with 7-8 and 9-10 runnerse0
Outcome
sapling numberse1
Direction
no significant differencee0

Verbatim

e0

“no significant difference was detected between groups with 7-8 and 9-10 runners”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–586
e1

“sapling numbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–505
t0

“Strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74

Title

Impact of Runner Development of Mother Plants during Seedling Strawberries on Daughter Plants Growth and Development during Phase of First Cluster

Gab-Soon Park; Seoung-Won Ann Journal of Environmental Science International 2016. doi:10.5322/jesi.2016.25.1.147

Other claims from this paper (14)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped soil improved seedling biomass and root development in pots.

Treatment
intercropped soile0
Outcome
seedling biomass and root developmente0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“pot experiments showed improved seedling biomass and root development in intercropped soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1021
t0

“apple sapling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–45

Title

Sequential intercropping boosts apple sapling growth and suppresses soil pathogens

Yiming Zhao; Yuan Zhuang Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science 2026. doi:10.1080/09064710.2026.2658244

Other claims from this paper (9)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sapling fresh weight decreased as runner number increased.

Taxon
StrawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
fresh weight of saplingse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
number of runners increasede0

Not reportedMaterial

Verbatim

e0

“The fresh weight of saplings decreased as the number of runners increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1359
t0

“Strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74

Title

Impact of Runner Development of Mother Plants during Seedling Strawberries on Daughter Plants Growth and Development during Phase of First Cluster

Gab-Soon Park; Seoung-Won Ann Journal of Environmental Science International 2016. doi:10.5322/jesi.2016.25.1.147

Other claims from this paper (14)
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Deveci cultivar showed good compatibility with all rootstocks owing to higher graft success and sapling performance.

Material
‘Deveci’e0
Outcome
good compatibility with all rootstockse0

Verbatim

e0

“‘Deveci’ cultivar shows good compatibility with all rootstocks due to the higher graft success and sapling performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1713
t0

“Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–111

Title

Effect of the Rootstock and Cultivar on Graft Success and Sapling Development and Graft Incompatibility in Pear

Nermin ÇOBAN; Ahmet ÖZTÜRK Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi 2020. doi:10.24180/ijaws.782502

Other claims from this paper (12)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.