Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Feature reduction decreased processing time in many cases.

Taxon
Two Basil Speciest0
Outcome
processing timee0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
Feature reductione0

Verbatim

t0

“Two Basil Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–81
e0

“Feature reduction provides the decrease in processing time in many cases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–625

Title

Feature Reduction from Correlation Matrix for Classification of Two Basil Species in Common Genus

Varin Chouvatut; Supawit Wattanapairotrat 2019 16th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE) 2019. doi:10.1109/jcsse.2019.8864221

Other claims from this paper (2)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GoogLeNet required longer processing time than the other models.

Taxon
leaft0
Outcome
processing timee0
Direction
longere0
Qualifier
high number of layerse0
Comparator
the other modelse0

Verbatim

e0

“the processing time for GoogLeNet is longer compared to the other models due to the high number of layers in its architecture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–871
t0

“Leaf Recognition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–64

Title

Comparing Convolution Neural Network Models for Leaf Recognition

Nurbaity Sabri; Zalilah Abdul Aziz; Zaidah Ibrahim; et al. International Journal of Engineering & Technology 2018. doi:10.14419/ijet.v7i3.15.17518

Other claims from this paper (1)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The procedure reduced data size and processing time without substantial information loss.

Taxon
PlantsViridiplantaee1
Outcome
data size and processing timee0
Comparator
important informatione0

Verbatim

e0

“The procedure did not eliminate too much important information while reducing data size and processing time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–579
e1

“Plants can be identified using several variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–57

Title

Machine Learning As Seed Image Identification Using Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

Indra Laksmana; Hendra; Jamaluddin; et al. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2022. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1097/1/012001

Other claims from this paper (4)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MSM reduced processing time by 9.471 seconds compared with full-spectrum processing while preserving overall accuracy.

Taxon
grasst0
Outcome
time consumption of MSMe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
9.471 se0
Comparator
full spectrume0

Verbatim

e0

“compared with the full spectrum, the time consumption of MSM was reduced by 9.471 s with guaranteed overall accuracy (OA).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1692–1814
t0

“grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49

Title

Visible-NIR hyperspectral classification of grass based on multivariate smooth mapping and extreme active learning approach

Xuanhe Zhao; Xin Pan; Weihong Yan; et al. Scientific Reports 2022. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-13136-x

Other claims from this paper (3)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VGG16, MobileNet and InceptionResNetV2 transfer-learning CNNs were applied to classify medicinal leaves in reduced processing time.

Taxon
medicinal leavese1
Outcome
processing timee1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
VGG16, MobileNet and InceptionResNetV2e1

Verbatim

e1

“applied three transfer learning techniques VGG16, MobileNet and InceptionResNetV2 for CNN model to classify the medicinal leaves in reduced processing time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–746

Title

Identification of Medicinal Leaves Using State of Art Deep Learning Techniques

Leena Rani A; Devika G.; Vinutha H. R; et al. 2022 IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing and Electrical Circuits and Electronics (ICDCECE) 2022. doi:10.1109/icdcece53908.2022.9792712

Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded digital image processing saves time and supports repeated vegetation structure measurement.

Taxon
vegetatione0
Outcome
vegetation structure quantificatione0
Comparator
good alternativee0

Verbatim

e0

“digital picture processing has several advantages with respect to time investment and repetition, and is a good alternative to vegetation structure quantification.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–663

Title

Digital picture processing: a new method to analyse vegetation structure

H. Roebertsen; G. W. Heil; R. Bobbink Acta Botanica Neerlandica 1988. doi:10.1111/j.1438-8677.1988.tb02127.x

Other claims from this paper (2)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mounting media and time since processing substantially affected reference pollen diameters.

Outcome
diameterse0
Direction
dramatic effectse0
Comparator
mounting mediae0

Verbatim

e0

“mounting media (and time since processing), which had rather dramatic effects on diameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1491

Title

A Palynological Study of Landscape Change During the Spanish Colonial Period in the U.S. Southwest

Nicole Marie Arendt UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) 2010

Other claims from this paper (5)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total processing time did not differ significantly between flotation and bag methods.

Taxon
weedt0
Outcome
did not differ significantlye0
Comparator
bag methodse0

Verbatim

e0

“flotation and bag methods did not differ significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1034
t0

“weed seedbanks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–97

Title

Comparison of three methodologies for efficient seed extraction in studies of soil weed seedbanks

M B MESGARAN; H R MASHHADI; E ZAND; et al. Weed Research 2007. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.2007.00592.x

Other claims from this paper (10)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Similar AEP processing of unrelated precursor proteins was found in distant plant families for a third time.

Taxon
plant familiese0
Gene
AEPe0
Outcome
AEP-mediated processing of a class of cyclic peptidese0
Value
third examplee0

Verbatim

e0

“This is the third example of similar AEP-mediated processing of a class of cyclic peptides from unrelated precursor proteins in phylogenetically distant plant families.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–973

Title

Cyclic Peptides Arising by Evolutionary Parallelism via Asparaginyl-Endopeptidase–Mediated Biosynthesis

Joshua S. Mylne; Lai Yue Chan; Aurelie H. Chanson; et al. The Plant Cell 2012. doi:10.1105/tpc.112.099085

Other claims from this paper (6)
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Advances in processing technology could ease women’s time constraints and conserve difficult-to-process sorghum varieties with other desirable traits.

Taxon
varietiese0
Outcome
conservation of difficult-to-process varietiese0
Qualifier
could resulte0

Verbatim

e0

“Technology advancements in processing ease women’s time constraints and could result in the conservation of difficult-to-process varieties that otherwise possess good traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–838

Title

Gender and the conservation of traditional crop varieties: the case of traditional sorghum in Agago District, Uganda

Businge, Martha; Odong, Thomas L.; Miiro, Richard AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) 2025. doi:10.22004/ag.econ.361305

Other claims from this paper (3)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.