Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C2 shading increased leaf chlorophyll content.

Taxon
MelaleucaMelaleucat0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
C2 treatmente0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
CK: no shadingt1

Verbatim

e0

“Under the C2 treatment, an increase in chlorophyll content was observed in the leaves of the seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1184
t0

“Effects of different shade treatments on Melaleuca seedling growth and physiological properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95
t1

“Four shading regimes (CK: no shading; C1: 35-45% shading; C2: 45-50% shading; C3: 60-70% shading) were imposed on M. alternifolia seedlings, following which observations were conducted after a 35-day period. The results reveal that the different shading treatments had a significant effect on the growth and physiological indicators of the seedlings, with the moderate shading treatment (C2) proving to be the most advan…” Show full quote

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–1802

Title

Effects of different shade treatments on Melaleuca seedling growth and physiological properties

Qiong Li; Le Zhang; Jienan He; et al. BMC Plant Biology 2025. doi:10.1186/s12870-025-06218-1

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C2 shading decreased ABA and GA3 levels.

Taxon
MelaleucaMelaleucat0
Treatment
C2t1
Outcome
levels of abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellic acid (GA3)e0
Direction
declinede0
Comparator
CK: no shadingt1

Verbatim

e0

“the levels of abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellic acid (GA3) declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1479
t0

“Effects of different shade treatments on Melaleuca seedling growth and physiological properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95
t1

“Four shading regimes (CK: no shading; C1: 35-45% shading; C2: 45-50% shading; C3: 60-70% shading) were imposed on M. alternifolia seedlings, following which observations were conducted after a 35-day period. The results reveal that the different shading treatments had a significant effect on the growth and physiological indicators of the seedlings, with the moderate shading treatment (C2) proving to be the most advan…” Show full quote

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–1802

Title

Effects of different shade treatments on Melaleuca seedling growth and physiological properties

Qiong Li; Le Zhang; Jienan He; et al. BMC Plant Biology 2025. doi:10.1186/s12870-025-06218-1

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C2 shading reduced SOD, POD and CAT activities.

Taxon
MelaleucaMelaleucat0
Treatment
C2t1
Outcome
activities of antioxidant enzymes, namely superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT)e0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
CK: no shadingt1

Verbatim

e0

“a reduction in the activities of antioxidant enzymes, namely superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1395
t0

“Effects of different shade treatments on Melaleuca seedling growth and physiological properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95
t1

“Four shading regimes (CK: no shading; C1: 35-45% shading; C2: 45-50% shading; C3: 60-70% shading) were imposed on M. alternifolia seedlings, following which observations were conducted after a 35-day period. The results reveal that the different shading treatments had a significant effect on the growth and physiological indicators of the seedlings, with the moderate shading treatment (C2) proving to be the most advan…” Show full quote

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–1802

Title

Effects of different shade treatments on Melaleuca seedling growth and physiological properties

Qiong Li; Le Zhang; Jienan He; et al. BMC Plant Biology 2025. doi:10.1186/s12870-025-06218-1

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C2 shading increased IAA, SA and CTK concentrations.

Taxon
MelaleucaMelaleucat0
Treatment
C2t1
Outcome
concentrations of auxin (IAA), salicylic acid (SA), and cytokinin (CTK)e0
Direction
ascendede0
Comparator
CK: no shadingt1

Verbatim

e0

“concentrations of auxin (IAA), salicylic acid (SA), and cytokinin (CTK) ascended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1491–1571
t0

“Effects of different shade treatments on Melaleuca seedling growth and physiological properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95
t1

“Four shading regimes (CK: no shading; C1: 35-45% shading; C2: 45-50% shading; C3: 60-70% shading) were imposed on M. alternifolia seedlings, following which observations were conducted after a 35-day period. The results reveal that the different shading treatments had a significant effect on the growth and physiological indicators of the seedlings, with the moderate shading treatment (C2) proving to be the most advan…” Show full quote

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–1802

Title

Effects of different shade treatments on Melaleuca seedling growth and physiological properties

Qiong Li; Le Zhang; Jienan He; et al. BMC Plant Biology 2025. doi:10.1186/s12870-025-06218-1

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

C2 shading significantly reduced lower epidermis and palisade tissue thickness.

Taxon
MelaleucaMelaleucat0
Treatment
C2 treatmente0
Outcome
thickness of the lower epidermis and palisade tissuee0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
control groupt1

Verbatim

e0

“the thickness of the lower epidermis and palisade tissue in the leaves of the seedlings subjected to the C2 treatment exhibited a significant reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1801
t0

“Effects of different shade treatments on Melaleuca seedling growth and physiological properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95
t1

“Four shading regimes (CK: no shading; C1: 35-45% shading; C2: 45-50% shading; C3: 60-70% shading) were imposed on M. alternifolia seedlings, following which observations were conducted after a 35-day period. The results reveal that the different shading treatments had a significant effect on the growth and physiological indicators of the seedlings, with the moderate shading treatment (C2) proving to be the most advan…” Show full quote

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–1802

Title

Effects of different shade treatments on Melaleuca seedling growth and physiological properties

Qiong Li; Le Zhang; Jienan He; et al. BMC Plant Biology 2025. doi:10.1186/s12870-025-06218-1

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyenopyrafen 30% SC at 300 ml/ha reduced the predatory spider population by 30.64% and 38.42% in the first and second sprays.

Treatment
300ml/hae4
Interactor
predatory spiderse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
spiders populatione3
Direction
decreaseinferrede3
Value
30.64 and 38.42e4
Qualifier
during I and II spraye4
Setting
Mukteshwar, Nainital district of Uttarakhande0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the impact of novel molecule, Cyenopyrafen 30% SC against predatory spiders and coccinellid beetles associated with apple orchard at Mukteshwar, Nainital district of Uttarakhand during 2013 and 2014”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243
e3

“Similarly the spiders population in standard checks i.e., fenazaquin 10% EC with 32.84% and 43.79% and propargite 57% EC with 26.52% and 38.03%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–752
e4

“in Cyenopyrafen 30% SC treatments @300ml/ha, 250ml/ha, 200ml/ha and 150ml/ha showed 30.64 and 38.42; 24.21 and 37.25; 21.89 and 32.86; 17.34 and 24.74% during I and II spray respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–948

Title

Evaluation of impact of novel molecule, cyenopyrafen 30% SC against predatory spiders and coccinellid beetles associated with apple orchard and its phytotoxicity on apple crop

Srivastava Rm; Shivashankara; Shivendra N. Tiwari Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2017

Other claims from this paper (11)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyenopyrafen 30% SC at 250 ml/ha reduced the predatory spider population by 24.21% and 37.25% in the first and second sprays.

Treatment
250ml/hae4
Interactor
predatory spiderse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
spiders populatione3
Direction
decreaseinferrede3
Value
24.21 and 37.25e4
Qualifier
during I and II spraye4
Setting
Mukteshwar, Nainital district of Uttarakhande0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the impact of novel molecule, Cyenopyrafen 30% SC against predatory spiders and coccinellid beetles associated with apple orchard at Mukteshwar, Nainital district of Uttarakhand during 2013 and 2014”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243
e3

“Similarly the spiders population in standard checks i.e., fenazaquin 10% EC with 32.84% and 43.79% and propargite 57% EC with 26.52% and 38.03%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–752
e4

“in Cyenopyrafen 30% SC treatments @300ml/ha, 250ml/ha, 200ml/ha and 150ml/ha showed 30.64 and 38.42; 24.21 and 37.25; 21.89 and 32.86; 17.34 and 24.74% during I and II spray respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–948

Title

Evaluation of impact of novel molecule, cyenopyrafen 30% SC against predatory spiders and coccinellid beetles associated with apple orchard and its phytotoxicity on apple crop

Srivastava Rm; Shivashankara; Shivendra N. Tiwari Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2017

Other claims from this paper (11)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyenopyrafen 30% SC at 200 ml/ha reduced the predatory spider population by 21.89% and 32.86% in the first and second sprays.

Treatment
200ml/hae4
Interactor
predatory spiderse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
spiders populatione3
Direction
decreaseinferrede3
Value
21.89 and 32.86e4
Qualifier
during I and II spraye4
Setting
Mukteshwar, Nainital district of Uttarakhande0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the impact of novel molecule, Cyenopyrafen 30% SC against predatory spiders and coccinellid beetles associated with apple orchard at Mukteshwar, Nainital district of Uttarakhand during 2013 and 2014”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243
e3

“Similarly the spiders population in standard checks i.e., fenazaquin 10% EC with 32.84% and 43.79% and propargite 57% EC with 26.52% and 38.03%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–752
e4

“in Cyenopyrafen 30% SC treatments @300ml/ha, 250ml/ha, 200ml/ha and 150ml/ha showed 30.64 and 38.42; 24.21 and 37.25; 21.89 and 32.86; 17.34 and 24.74% during I and II spray respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–948

Title

Evaluation of impact of novel molecule, cyenopyrafen 30% SC against predatory spiders and coccinellid beetles associated with apple orchard and its phytotoxicity on apple crop

Srivastava Rm; Shivashankara; Shivendra N. Tiwari Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2017

Other claims from this paper (11)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyenopyrafen 30% SC at 150 ml/ha reduced the predatory spider population by 17.34% and 24.74% in the first and second sprays.

Treatment
150ml/hae4
Interactor
predatory spiderse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
spiders populatione3
Direction
decreaseinferrede3
Value
17.34 and 24.74e4
Qualifier
during I and II spraye4
Setting
Mukteshwar, Nainital district of Uttarakhande0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the impact of novel molecule, Cyenopyrafen 30% SC against predatory spiders and coccinellid beetles associated with apple orchard at Mukteshwar, Nainital district of Uttarakhand during 2013 and 2014”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243
e3

“Similarly the spiders population in standard checks i.e., fenazaquin 10% EC with 32.84% and 43.79% and propargite 57% EC with 26.52% and 38.03%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–752
e4

“in Cyenopyrafen 30% SC treatments @300ml/ha, 250ml/ha, 200ml/ha and 150ml/ha showed 30.64 and 38.42; 24.21 and 37.25; 21.89 and 32.86; 17.34 and 24.74% during I and II spray respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–948

Title

Evaluation of impact of novel molecule, cyenopyrafen 30% SC against predatory spiders and coccinellid beetles associated with apple orchard and its phytotoxicity on apple crop

Srivastava Rm; Shivashankara; Shivendra N. Tiwari Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2017

Other claims from this paper (11)
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In disturbed communities abundant plant species rewired more.

Taxon
Olea europaeaOlea europaeae0
Outcome
rewiringe0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
abundant speciese0
Setting
disturbed communitiese0

Verbatim

e0

“We sampled pollination interactions in 20 wild Olea europaea communities along a disturbance gradient to evaluate the hypothesis that the loss of natural habitats increases seasonal (within‐year) interaction rewiring in plant‐pollinator communities, influencing their functional structure. For this, we particularly tested whether rewiring frequency was negatively related to the extent of natural habitats surrounding t…” Show full quote

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–1833

Title

Habitat loss increases seasonal interaction rewiring in plant–pollinator networks

Amparo Lázaro; Carmelo Gómez‐Martínez Functional Ecology 2022. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.14160

Other claims from this paper (5)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.