View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Field-vine estimation methods differed by 15% on average.
Outcomeestimation methods differed e0 Verbatim
e0 “estimation methods differed on average by 15% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1322 t0 “grapevines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–143 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeatability estimates differed across crops, traits and estimation methods .
Outcomerepeatability coefficients e1 Qualifiervaried among crops, traits and estimation methods e1 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Bertholletia excelsa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–106 e1 “Estimates of repeatability coefficients varied among crops, traits and estimation methods . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–851 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The ordering of thresholding methods by length estimation error differed from that by projected-area accuracy.
Outcomelength estimation error e0 Comparatora little different order of accuracy e0 Verbatim
e0 “the length estimation error points out a little different order of accuracy ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–930 t0 “roots of cork oak (Quercus suber L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–720 Other claims from this paper (1) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The best spectral preprocessing method differed by wood property.
Outcomenear infrared spectra pre-processing methods e0 Verbatim
e0 “The best near infrared spectra pre-processing methods differed by property. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–575 t0 “Tectona grandis wood ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–87 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
RF estimation accuracy differed significantly across model inputs, unlike the other four models.
Outcomeaccuracy of model estimation e0 Directionsignificantly different e0 Comparatorthe other four models e0 Verbatim
e0 “The accuracy of model estimation based on RF is significantly different for different model inputs, while the other four models have small differences. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1409 t0 “Cinnamomum camphora ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–116 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Thresholding methods differed significantly in accuracy for estimated fine-root projected area.
Outcometotal projected area e0 Directionsignificantly better e0 Verbatim
e0 “some of the thresholding methods perform significantly better than others in the estimation of total projected area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–846 t0 “roots of cork oak (Quercus suber L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–720 Other claims from this paper (1) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Forest biomass estimates from the stratify-and-multiply and direct remote sensing approaches differed .
Outcomebiomass estimation e1 Comparator‘stratify and multiply’ (SM) e1 SettingDungun Timber Complex (DTC), Terengganu e3 Verbatim
t0 “in the tropical forest ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–53 e1 “This study was carried out to determine the differences in biomass estimation between two approaches, ‘stratify and multiply’ (SM) and ‘direct remote sensing’ (DR) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–338 e2 “Results indicated that biomass estimated between these two methods differed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1141 e3 “The 3666 ha lowland forest study area was located in the Dungun Timber Complex (DTC), Terengganu ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–436 Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Elemental analysis and combustion methods differed little, with elemental analysis tending to give higher growth cost values.
Outcomevalues calculated from the elemental analysis data e0 QualifierLittle difference was observed between the two methods e0 Comparatorheats of combustion data e0 Verbatim
e0 “Little difference was observed between the two methods , but the values calculated from the elemental analysis data tended to be higher than those calculated from the heats of combustion data. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1299 t0 “apple ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Satellite and infrared thermometer CWSI estimates differed by less than 3% on average.
Treatmentsatellite-based approach $(CWSI_{sat-based})$ using Landsat 8 satellite images e2 Outcomeaverage differences between CWSI estimation methods e0 Comparatoran established method based on canopy leaf temperature using infrared thermometers (IRT) e1 SettingBrandenburg (Germany) e3 Verbatim
e0 “average differences between CWSI estimation methods were less than 3%, indicating good agreement between both methods ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–688 e1 “an established method based on canopy leaf temperature using infrared thermometers (IRT) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–250 e2 “satellite-based approach $(CWSI_{sat-based})$ using Landsat 8 satellite images ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–436 e3 “commercial apple orchard in Brandenburg (Germany) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–118 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Phytophthora isolates from different Colombian cacao regions differed significantly in aggressiveness.
SettingColombian cacao regions e0 Verbatim
e0 “Significant differences in aggressiveness were established between the isolates from different Colombian cacao regions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1312 t0 “cacao genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–66 e1 “two artificial inoculation methods for Phytophthora palmivora and their potential association ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–336 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.