Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At lower rust levels, spraying reduced leaf and head stripe rust incidence.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume1
Interactor: Puccinia striijormise1pathogen
Outcome: incidence of stripe rust on leaves and on headse0
Direction: reducede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the incidence of stripe rust on leaves and on heads was reduced”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1041

e1
“stripe rust (Puccinia striijormis) in wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–58

Title

SOME ASPECTS OF STRIPE RUST CONTROL IN SOUTHLAND

W. H. Risk; R.M. Beresford 1982

Other claims from this paper (11)

Observation Stripe rust developed at different rates in three wheat cultivars.
Observation In unsprayed wheat plots, Tiritea was severely affected by stripe rust.
Observation In unsprayed wheat plots, Kopara was slightly affected by stripe rust.
Observation In unsprayed wheat plots, Karamu was affected very little by stripe rust.
Intervention effect One, two, or three fungicide sprays significantly increased Tiritea yield.
Intervention effect Spraying did not significantly increase Kopara yield.
Intervention effect Spraying did not significantly increase Karamu yield.
Intervention effect Spraying improved Tiritea thousand grain weight and grains per head.
Intervention effect Late spraying gave variable results in Takahe and Tiritea.
Intervention effect Under high infection, Tiritea responded significantly to spraying through late milk stage.
Intervention effect At lower rust levels, spraying did not produce yield responses.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In unsprayed wheat plots, Kopara was slightly affected by stripe rust.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material: Koparae0
Interactor: Puccinia striijormise1pathogen
Outcome: slightly affectede0

Verbatim

e0
“Kopara slightly affected”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–361

e1
“stripe rust (Puccinia striijormis) in wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–58

Title

SOME ASPECTS OF STRIPE RUST CONTROL IN SOUTHLAND

W. H. Risk; R.M. Beresford 1982

Other claims from this paper (11)

Observation Stripe rust developed at different rates in three wheat cultivars.
Observation In unsprayed wheat plots, Tiritea was severely affected by stripe rust.
Observation In unsprayed wheat plots, Karamu was affected very little by stripe rust.
Intervention effect One, two, or three fungicide sprays significantly increased Tiritea yield.
Intervention effect Spraying did not significantly increase Kopara yield.
Intervention effect Spraying did not significantly increase Karamu yield.
Intervention effect Spraying improved Tiritea thousand grain weight and grains per head.
Intervention effect Late spraying gave variable results in Takahe and Tiritea.
Intervention effect Under high infection, Tiritea responded significantly to spraying through late milk stage.
Intervention effect At lower rust levels, spraying did not produce yield responses.
Intervention effect At lower rust levels, spraying reduced leaf and head stripe rust incidence.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In unsprayed wheat plots, Karamu was affected very little by stripe rust.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material: Karamue0
Interactor: Puccinia striijormise1pathogen
Outcome: affected very littlee0

Verbatim

e0
“Karamu affected very little”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–393

e1
“stripe rust (Puccinia striijormis) in wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–58

Title

SOME ASPECTS OF STRIPE RUST CONTROL IN SOUTHLAND

W. H. Risk; R.M. Beresford 1982

Other claims from this paper (11)

Observation Stripe rust developed at different rates in three wheat cultivars.
Observation In unsprayed wheat plots, Tiritea was severely affected by stripe rust.
Observation In unsprayed wheat plots, Kopara was slightly affected by stripe rust.
Intervention effect One, two, or three fungicide sprays significantly increased Tiritea yield.
Intervention effect Spraying did not significantly increase Kopara yield.
Intervention effect Spraying did not significantly increase Karamu yield.
Intervention effect Spraying improved Tiritea thousand grain weight and grains per head.
Intervention effect Late spraying gave variable results in Takahe and Tiritea.
Intervention effect Under high infection, Tiritea responded significantly to spraying through late milk stage.
Intervention effect At lower rust levels, spraying did not produce yield responses.
Intervention effect At lower rust levels, spraying reduced leaf and head stripe rust incidence.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. intermedium had a low-intensity reaction to stripe rust.

Taxon: A. intermediumThinopyrum intermediume0
Interactor: stripe ruste0pathogen
Outcome: low intensity reactione0

Verbatim

e0
“low intensity reaction of A. intermedium to stripe rust”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–664

Title

Agropyron-Derived Specific Genes in Common Wheat and their Adult Plant Response to Wheat Pathogens

M. Kochumadhavan; S. M. S. Tomar; P. N. N. Nambisan Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding (The) 1988

Other claims from this paper (7)

Association Sr24, Sr26 and Sr Agi conferred effective adult-plant stem rust resistance in wheat.
Association Lrl9, Lr24 and Lr29 conditioned high leaf rust resistance in wheat.
Association Sr25 was ineffective for wheat resistance.
Observation All tested wheat stocks were susceptible to powdery mildew.
Observation Both Agropyron species were free of rusts and powdery mildew apart from the stripe rust exception.
Observation All tested wheat stocks except Eagle lacked necrosis genes.
Observation Eagle comprised Ne1 ne2 and ne1 ne2 genotypes.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stripe rust developed at different rates in three wheat cultivars.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume1
Interactor: Puccinia striijormise1pathogen
Outcome: infectione0

Not reportedSetting

Verbatim

e0
“infection first developed in early December but developed at different rates in three cultivars”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–272

e1
“stripe rust (Puccinia striijormis) in wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–58

Title

SOME ASPECTS OF STRIPE RUST CONTROL IN SOUTHLAND

W. H. Risk; R.M. Beresford 1982

Other claims from this paper (11)

Observation In unsprayed wheat plots, Tiritea was severely affected by stripe rust.
Observation In unsprayed wheat plots, Kopara was slightly affected by stripe rust.
Observation In unsprayed wheat plots, Karamu was affected very little by stripe rust.
Intervention effect One, two, or three fungicide sprays significantly increased Tiritea yield.
Intervention effect Spraying did not significantly increase Kopara yield.
Intervention effect Spraying did not significantly increase Karamu yield.
Intervention effect Spraying improved Tiritea thousand grain weight and grains per head.
Intervention effect Late spraying gave variable results in Takahe and Tiritea.
Intervention effect Under high infection, Tiritea responded significantly to spraying through late milk stage.
Intervention effect At lower rust levels, spraying did not produce yield responses.
Intervention effect At lower rust levels, spraying reduced leaf and head stripe rust incidence.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low yield potential was associated with combined leaf and stripe rust resistance.

Taxon: Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: combined leaf and stripe rust resistancee0
Outcome: inherent yield potentiale0
Direction: Lowe0

Verbatim

e0
“Low inherent yield potential was associated with increased backcross number and combined leaf and stripe rust resistance.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1263

t0
“Spring Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67

Title

Effectiveness of Stripe Rust Resistance among Lemhi 53 Spring Wheat Near‐Isogenic Lines¹

C. A. Griffey; R. E. Allan Crop Science 1986. doi:10.2135/cropsci1986.0011183x002600030010x

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jinghua No. 1 strongly resisted leaf, stem and stripe rust and powdery mildew.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome: resists strongly leaf, stem and stripe rust and powdery mildewe0

Not reportedMaterialDirection

Verbatim

e0
“It resists strongly leaf, stem and stripe rust and powdery mildew”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–884

t0
“WHEAT”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29

Title

JINGHUA NO. 1——A WINTER WHEAT VARIETY DERIVED FROM POLLEN SPOROPHYTE

Iu J 中国科学B辑(英文版) 1986

Other claims from this paper (10)

Observation Anther inoculation yielded 46 green wheat plantlets.
Observation The induced percentage of green plantlets was 11.50%.
Observation After chromosome doubling, 28 plantlets set seeds.
Observation H2 generation plants varied in morphology, growing period and disease resistance.
Observation Jinghua No. 1 occupied 7000 ha of planting area in 1984.
Observation Jinghua No. 1 was described as high yield.
Observation Jinghua No. 1 was described as high quality.
Observation Jinghua No. 1 had good adaptation.
Observation Jinghua No. 1 development took seven generations.
Association The authors conclude pollen breeding takes less time than traditional hybridization breeding.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat cultivars with seedling resistance to stripe rust were not infected in the spike.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material: Cultivars with seedling resistancee2
Interactor: stripe ruste2pathogen
Outcome: infected in the spikee2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1
“The levels of resistance to stripe rust ( Puccinia striiforrms f. sp. tritici ) in the leaf and in the spike were related in most wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. ) cultivars”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 9–178

e2
“Cultivars with seedling resistance to stripe rust were not infected in the spike”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–260

Title

Infection and control of stripe rust in wheat spikes

M. G. Cromey New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 1989. doi:10.1080/01140671.1989.10428025

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In unsprayed wheat plots, Tiritea was severely affected by stripe rust.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material: Tiriteae0
Interactor: Puccinia striijormise1pathogen
Outcome: severely affectede0

Verbatim

e0
“In unsprayed plots the cultivar Tiritea was severely affected, Kopara slightly affected and Karamu affected very little.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–394

e1
“stripe rust (Puccinia striijormis) in wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–58

Title

SOME ASPECTS OF STRIPE RUST CONTROL IN SOUTHLAND

W. H. Risk; R.M. Beresford 1982

Other claims from this paper (11)

Observation Stripe rust developed at different rates in three wheat cultivars.
Observation In unsprayed wheat plots, Kopara was slightly affected by stripe rust.
Observation In unsprayed wheat plots, Karamu was affected very little by stripe rust.
Intervention effect One, two, or three fungicide sprays significantly increased Tiritea yield.
Intervention effect Spraying did not significantly increase Kopara yield.
Intervention effect Spraying did not significantly increase Karamu yield.
Intervention effect Spraying improved Tiritea thousand grain weight and grains per head.
Intervention effect Late spraying gave variable results in Takahe and Tiritea.
Intervention effect Under high infection, Tiritea responded significantly to spraying through late milk stage.
Intervention effect At lower rust levels, spraying did not produce yield responses.
Intervention effect At lower rust levels, spraying reduced leaf and head stripe rust incidence.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most lines had probably race-specific stripe rust resistance.

Outcome: resistance believed to be race‐specifice0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“Most lines had resistance believed to be race‐specific”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–701

Title

Inheritance of Stripe Rust Resistance among Near‐Isogenic Lines of Spring Wheat

C. A. Griffey; R. E. Allan Crop Science 1988. doi:10.2135/cropsci1988.0011183x002800010012x

Other claims from this paper (8)

“stripe rust”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics