Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“decrease in relative water content”

58 matchesgrouped into 1 category

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 16 non-evaluative

Over time

1960 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

1990s 58

Show all 58 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress decreased leaf area and relative water content in mulberry, with a marked decrease only in severe stress.

Taxon: mulberrye0
Treatment: water stresse0
Outcome: leaf area and relative water contente2
Direction: decreasede2
Qualifier: a marked decrease was observed only in severe stress treatmente2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“in 3-month-old mulberry plants at four levels of water stress”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–148

e2
“Though leaf area and relative water content decreased, significantly, a marked decrease was observed only in severe stress treatment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–380

Title

CHANGES IN LEAF WATER POTENTIAL, OSMOTIC ADJUSTMENT, AND PROLINE METABOLISM IN MULBERRY DURING WATER STRESS

B.D. Ranjitha Kumari; K. Veeranjaneyulu Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 1996. doi:10.1080/07929978.1996.10676642

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Water stress significantly decreased leaf water potential and osmotic potential in mulberry.
Intervention effect Water stress caused accumulation of total amino acids and proline in roots and leaves of mulberry.
Intervention effect Amino acid accumulation under water stress was greater in leaves than in roots of mulberry.
Intervention effect Proline accumulation under water stress was greater in roots than in leaves of mulberry.
Intervention effect Water stress inhibited the activities of proline dehydrogenase and proline oxidase in mulberry.
Intervention effect Inhibition of proline oxidase under water stress was greater in roots than in leaves of mulberry.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity significantly reduced relative water content.

Taxon: alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment: Increased salinitye0
Outcome: relative water contente0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Increased salinity resulted in a significant decrease in shoot and root biomass, relative water content and water potential.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–519

t0
“alfalfa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–82

Title

Effects of salinity and nitrogen source on growth and nitrogen fixation in alfalfa

Rachid Serraj; Jean‐Jacques Drevon Journal of Plant Nutrition 1998. doi:10.1080/01904169809365525

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Increasing salinity significantly reduced alfalfa shoot biomass.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity significantly reduced alfalfa root biomass.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity significantly reduced water potential.
Observation Salt inhibited shoot growth more than root biomass.
Intervention effect Nitrate-fed plants were slightly less affected by salt than nitrogen-fixing plants.
Intervention effect Salt substantially inhibited nitrogenase activity.
Association Inhibition of nitrogenase activity was significantly correlated with inhibition of shoot growth.
Association Inhibition of nitrogenase activity was significantly correlated with total nitrogen contents.
Intervention effect Salt exposure significantly increased critical oxygen pressure of nodules.
Mechanism Salt decreased oxygen diffusion permeability of alfalfa nodules.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decreasing soil water potential during vegetative and flowering stages caused a higher decrease in relative water content in pigeon pea cv. ICPL-151 than in cv. H-77-216.

Taxon: pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Material: cv. ICPL-151e1
Organ / stage: vegetative and flowering stagese1
Treatment: Decrease in soil water potentiale1
Outcome: relative water contente1
Direction: higher decreasee1
Comparator: cv. H-77-216e1

Verbatim

t0
“Response of pigeon pea cultivars to water stress”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48

e1
“Decrease in soil water potential during vegetative and flowering stages of two cultivars of pipeon pea (Cajanus cajari) caused higher decrease in relative water content in cv. ICPL-151 than in cv. H-77-216”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205

Title

Response of pigeon pea cultivars to water stress

A. S. Nandwal; S. Bharti; M. S. Kuhad; et al. Biologia Plantarum 1993. doi:10.1007/bf02928044

Other claims from this paper (3)

Observation Both pigeon pea cultivars showed partial recovery during rehydration.
Intervention effect Pigeon pea cv. H-77-216 accumulated more proline and carbohydrates than cv. ICPL-151 during water stress.
Intervention effect Pigeon pea cv. H-77-216 showed better drought tolerance than cv. ICPL-151.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“decrease in relative water content”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

1990s 58