Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“decrease in relative water content”

4 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 1 non-evaluative

Over time

2000 ’10 ’20

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Organism: Carthamus tinctorius ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot spraying increased relative leaf water content.

Taxon: safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
Treatment: spraying of the shootse0
Outcome: relative water content in the plant leavese0
Direction: increasee0
Comparator: untreated plantse0

Verbatim

e0
“The spraying of the shoots, has led to increase the relative water content in the plant leaves and decrease the cell membrane stability in comparison with untreated plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–672

t0
“safflower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21

Title

Response of safflower to different concentrations of Mubkoet Chlorocytide growth regulator

Hussain Ali Mağallaẗ al-tarbiyaẗ wa-al-ʻilm 2005. doi:10.33899/edusj.2005.82975

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Growth regulator reduced safflower height and root length.
Intervention effect Growth regulator significantly increased shoot and root dry weight, especially at 20 and 40 ppm.
Intervention effect Shoot spraying decreased cell membrane stability.
Intervention effect Spraying significantly reduced proline concentration, especially at 20 and 40 ppm.
Intervention effect Spraying increased chlorophyll b concentration, particularly at 60 ppm.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot spraying decreased cell membrane stability.

Taxon: safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
Treatment: spraying of the shootse0
Outcome: cell membrane stabilitye0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: untreated plantse0

Verbatim

e0
“The spraying of the shoots, has led to increase the relative water content in the plant leaves and decrease the cell membrane stability in comparison with untreated plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–672

t0
“safflower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21

Title

Response of safflower to different concentrations of Mubkoet Chlorocytide growth regulator

Hussain Ali Mağallaẗ al-tarbiyaẗ wa-al-ʻilm 2005. doi:10.33899/edusj.2005.82975

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Growth regulator reduced safflower height and root length.
Intervention effect Growth regulator significantly increased shoot and root dry weight, especially at 20 and 40 ppm.
Intervention effect Shoot spraying increased relative leaf water content.
Intervention effect Spraying significantly reduced proline concentration, especially at 20 and 40 ppm.
Intervention effect Spraying increased chlorophyll b concentration, particularly at 60 ppm.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying significantly reduced proline concentration, especially at 20 and 40 ppm.

Taxon: safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
Treatment: spraying of the shootse1
Outcome: concentration of prolinee0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: especially with concentrations of (20) and (40) ppme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“moreover a significant decrease noticed in the concentration of proline especially with concentrations of (20) and (40) ppm and increase in the concentration of chlorophyll b particularly with concentration (60) ppm.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–890

t0
“safflower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21

e1
“The spraying of the shoots, has led to increase the relative water content in the plant leaves and decrease the cell membrane stability in comparison with untreated plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–672

Title

Response of safflower to different concentrations of Mubkoet Chlorocytide growth regulator

Hussain Ali Mağallaẗ al-tarbiyaẗ wa-al-ʻilm 2005. doi:10.33899/edusj.2005.82975

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Growth regulator reduced safflower height and root length.
Intervention effect Growth regulator significantly increased shoot and root dry weight, especially at 20 and 40 ppm.
Intervention effect Shoot spraying increased relative leaf water content.
Intervention effect Shoot spraying decreased cell membrane stability.
Intervention effect Spraying increased chlorophyll b concentration, particularly at 60 ppm.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying increased chlorophyll b concentration, particularly at 60 ppm.

Taxon: safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
Treatment: spraying of the shootse1
Outcome: concentration of chlorophyll be0
Direction: increasee0
Qualifier: particularly with concentration (60) ppme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“increase in the concentration of chlorophyll b particularly with concentration (60) ppm.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–890

t0
“safflower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21

e1
“The spraying of the shoots, has led to increase the relative water content in the plant leaves and decrease the cell membrane stability in comparison with untreated plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–672

Title

Response of safflower to different concentrations of Mubkoet Chlorocytide growth regulator

Hussain Ali Mağallaẗ al-tarbiyaẗ wa-al-ʻilm 2005. doi:10.33899/edusj.2005.82975

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Growth regulator reduced safflower height and root length.
Intervention effect Growth regulator significantly increased shoot and root dry weight, especially at 20 and 40 ppm.
Intervention effect Shoot spraying increased relative leaf water content.
Intervention effect Shoot spraying decreased cell membrane stability.
Intervention effect Spraying significantly reduced proline concentration, especially at 20 and 40 ppm.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“decrease in relative water content”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics