Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Growth regulator significantly increased shoot and root dry weight, especially at 20 and 40 ppm.

A claim from Response of safflower to different concentrations of Mubkoet Chlorocytide growth regulator · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulator significantly increased shoot and root dry weight, especially at 20 and 40 ppm.

Treatment
growth regulator in different concentrationse0
Outcome
dry weight of shoots and rootse0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
especially with concentration of (20) and (40) ppme0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The main results indicate that the addition of the growth regulator in different concentrations has led to decrease in the height plant, root length , and significant increase in the dry weight of shoots and roots, especially with concentration of (20) and (40) ppm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–500
t0

“safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21

Title

Response of safflower to different concentrations of Mubkoet Chlorocytide growth regulator

Hussain Ali Mağallaẗ al-tarbiyaẗ wa-al-ʻilm 2005. doi:10.33899/edusj.2005.82975

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-b2dc6c445a54039e93a5973700a0743cab2b069ce29ee82d4530c35d35ba14a2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

class · growth · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.