View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Average leaf blade length was 1.9 times average maximum leaf width .
OutcomeAverage leaf blade length e0 Comparatoraverage maximum leaf width e0 Verbatim
t0 “Populus ciliata × Populus maximowiczii hybrid ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–90 e0 “Average leaf blade length was 1.9 times compared to average maximum leaf width ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–285 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf width correlated negatively with average vein width , coefficient -0.85.
Organ / stageleaf width e0 Outcomeaverage vein width (AVW) e0 Verbatim
t0 “Sugarcane Genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–131 e0 “There was an extremely significant negative correlation coefficient (-0.85) between leaf width and average vein width (AVW). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–391 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The average leaf length-to- width ratio is 1.6.
Material'Reinette Russet' t0 Outcomeleaf length to width ratio e0 Verbatim
t0 “'Reinette Russet' Apple ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 e0 “The average leaf length to width ratio is 1.6 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–419 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The average leaf length versus average leaf width correlation coefficient was 0.995.
TaxonWenzhou orange trees e1 Organ / stagespring leaf e1 Outcomeaverage leaf-length vs.average leaf-width e0 Settingorchards of the Yongzhou Vocational and Technical College e1 Verbatim
e0 “The adjusting coefficient for the leaf size,correlation coefficients for leaf -length vs. leaf -size and for average leaf -length vs. average leaf - width were determined as 0.6835,0.9962 and 0.995,respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–740 e1 “We determined the spring leaf sizes of the Wenzhou orange trees grown in orchards of the Yongzhou Vocational and Technical College by using coefficient adjusting and one-dimensional regression equation methods. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–536 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The former near-grafting group had greater plant height, width and true- leaf number than the latter.
OutcomeAverage plant height,average plant width and average real leaves numbers e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Average plant height, average plant width and average real leaves numbers of former were larger than latter. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–822 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Cultivated and wild soybeans differed in average leaf width .
Value6.8±1.241 cm and 2.9±0.92 cm e0 Verbatim
e0 “6.8±1.241 cm and 2.9±0.92 cm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–785 e1 “Average leaf length, leaf width , leaf area, leaf shape index (LSI) of cultivating and wild soybeans were 12.3±1.25 cm and 6.6±1.35 cm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–755 t0 “cultivating and wild soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–60 t1 “leaf characters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–28 Other claims from this paper (18) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The average leaf length versus leaf width regression model was Y=1.1211+0.6595X.
TaxonWenzhou orange trees e1 Organ / stagespring leaf e1 Outcomeaverage leaf-length vs.leaf-width e0 Settingorchards of the Yongzhou Vocational and Technical College e1 Verbatim
e0 “The one-dimensional regression equation model for average leaf -length vs. leaf - width was(Y=1.1211+0.6595X). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–946 e1 “We determined the spring leaf sizes of the Wenzhou orange trees grown in orchards of the Yongzhou Vocational and Technical College by using coefficient adjusting and one-dimensional regression equation methods. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–536 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Plants at the lower average daily temperature had a smaller leaf length-to- width ratio.
Outcomelength to width ratio e5 Verbatim
t0 “Doritaenopsis Hybrid Orchid ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–75 e5 “Leaves produced by plants at the lower ADT had a smaller length to width ratio and the more desirable oval shape ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–999 Other claims from this paper (18) Association Plants under the higher average daily temperature produced more leaves. Intervention effect Plants at 30/25 °C had the largest leaf span and total new leaf length. Observation At 30/25 °C, plants produced 5.0 new leaves. Observation At 25/30 °C, plants produced 4.7 new leaves. Observation At 25/20 °C, plants produced 3.6 new leaves. Observation At 20/25 °C, plants produced 2.8 new leaves. Intervention effect Cool days and warm nights reduced leaf span compared with 25/30 °C, particularly at 20/25 °C. Intervention effect Cool days and warm nights reduced leaf growth compared with 25/30 °C. Observation Plants at the lower average daily temperature produced the more desirable oval leaf shape. Intervention effect At 20/25 °C, 14 of 15 plants bloomed. Intervention effect At 25/20 °C, only 5 plants flowered. Intervention effect No plants flowered at 30/25 or 25/30 °C. Intervention effect All plants at 15/25 °C bloomed, while none in the other treatments flowered. Intervention effect Long-term exposure to 15/25 °C resulted in slow leaf production. Intervention effect Long-term exposure to 15/25 °C produced small, undesirable leaves. Recommendation Nights 10-5 °C warmer than days in the 20-15 °C range are not desirable for rapid vegetative growth. Recommendation Cool days and warm nights may be used to effectively induce flowering. Intervention effect Within a given average daily temperature, cooler days produced shorter leaves. Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Mean leaf width was 3.51 cm.
Outcomeaverage leaf wide e0 Verbatim
e0 “average leaf wide was 3.51 cm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–816 t0 “Botanical Characteristics and Karyotype Analysis in Osmanthus fragrans cv. Jinshi ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–81 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Line 52-7 had smaller average stomatal width than Zhong 8.
Verbatim
e0 “52-7 was obviously different from Zhong 8 in stomatal characters and their correlation,such as the bigger average length and density,the smaller average width ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–339 t0 “rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–82 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.