View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: corn ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Wet pack density of corn silage tended to decrease as maturity advanced.
Outcomewet pack density e0 Qualifierin all of the pack-density experiments e0 Verbatim
e0 “The wet pack density of corn silage tended to decrease as maturity advanced in all of the pack- density experiments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–446 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The in crease in bald tip exceeded the decrease in ear length and width at higher density .
TreatmentIncreased planting density e1 Qualifierlarger than the decrease of ear length and width e0 Verbatim
e0 “the in crease of bald tip was larger than the decrease of ear length and width. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1101 e1 “In creased planting density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–939 t0 “corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–35 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect Planting density significantly affected ear length, diameter and bald tip degree. Intervention effect Planting density significantly affected row number per ear, grain number per row and ear grain weight. Intervention effect Planting density significantly affected seed set percentage and bract and silk dry weight. Intervention effect Planting density significantly affected cob and ear pedicle dry weight. Observation Hybrids differed significantly in density responses for ear length, bald tip degree and grain number per row. Observation Hybrids differed significantly in density responses for ear grain weight, seed set percentage and bract and silk dry weight. Observation Density response variation for ear length, grain number per row and ear grain weight ranked tall, medium, then short hybrids. Observation Density response variation for seed set percentage and bract and silk dry weight ranked tall, medium, then short hybrids. Association Increasing density decreased ear grain number mainly through fewer grains per row. Association For a given hybrid, grain to ear percentage was relatively stable across densities. Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing density decrease d ear grain number mainly through fewer grains per row.
TreatmentIncreased planting density e0 Outcomeear grain number e0 Qualifierreduced grain number per row e0 Verbatim
e0 “In creased planting density led to decrease in ear grain number due mainly to reduced grain number per row ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1018 t0 “corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–35 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect Planting density significantly affected ear length, diameter and bald tip degree. Intervention effect Planting density significantly affected row number per ear, grain number per row and ear grain weight. Intervention effect Planting density significantly affected seed set percentage and bract and silk dry weight. Intervention effect Planting density significantly affected cob and ear pedicle dry weight. Observation Hybrids differed significantly in density responses for ear length, bald tip degree and grain number per row. Observation Hybrids differed significantly in density responses for ear grain weight, seed set percentage and bract and silk dry weight. Observation Density response variation for ear length, grain number per row and ear grain weight ranked tall, medium, then short hybrids. Observation Density response variation for seed set percentage and bract and silk dry weight ranked tall, medium, then short hybrids. Association The increase in bald tip exceeded the decrease in ear length and width at higher density. Association For a given hybrid, grain to ear percentage was relatively stable across densities. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Narrow corn rows suppressed weed biomass more than high plant density .
Treatmentnarrow row spacing e0 Outcomebiomass production by both transplanted and naturally occurring weeds e0 Comparatorhigh plant population density e0 Verbatim
t0 “Corn (Zea mays ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–69 e0 “the decrease in biomass production by both transplanted and naturally occurring weeds was greater due to the narrow row spacing than due to the high plant population density . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1023 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The 0.5x herbicide rate decrease d weed seed density compared with an untreated check (239 vs. 14 241 seeds m-2).
TreatmentHerbicide application at the 0.5× rate e2 Outcomeweed seed density e1 Directiondecrease inferred e1 Value239 vs. 14 241 seeds m -2 e1 Comparatoruntreated check e2 Verbatim
t0 “Ontario field corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–114 e2 “Herbicide application at the 0.5× rate versus an untreated check ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–631 e1 “weed seed density (239 vs. 14 241 seeds m -2 ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–847 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The 0.5x herbicide rate decrease d weed plant density compared with an untreated check (11.0 vs. 52.6 plants m-2).
TreatmentHerbicide application at the 0.5× rate e2 Outcomeweed plant density e1 Directiondecrease inferred e1 Value11.0 vs. 52.6 plants m -2 e1 Comparatoruntreated check e2 Verbatim
t0 “Ontario field corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–114 e2 “Herbicide application at the 0.5× rate versus an untreated check ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–631 e1 “weed plant density (11.0 vs. 52.6 plants m -2 ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–796 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Subsoil mechanical impedance reduced corn root growth in the top layer from 3.16 and 2.41 to 1.37 cm cm -3 (P<0.005).
Treatmentsubsoil mechanical impedance e2 Directiondecrease inferred e1 Value3.16; 2.41 to 1.37 cm cm -3 e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “root length density and root diameter of the corn (Zea mays L.) crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–646 e1 “root growth was affected from 3.16; 2.41 to 1.37 cm cm -3 (P<0.005) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1477 e2 “the main effects of subsoil mechanical impedance were observed on the top layer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1321 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Dense corn population was associated with a 16% loss in pigweed total dry matter accumulation (TDM).
Treatmentdense corn population e2 Directiondecrease inferred e2 SettingEsfahan agricultural research station e1 Verbatim
e1 “a field experiment was carried out at Esfahan agricultural research station 2003 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–232 e2 “dense corn population, lead to 26.2, 16 and 19.7 percent loss in pigweed LAI, TDM and WGR respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1156 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Dense corn population was associated with a 19.7% loss in pigweed weed growth rate (WGR).
Treatmentdense corn population e2 Directiondecrease inferred e2 SettingEsfahan agricultural research station e1 Verbatim
e1 “a field experiment was carried out at Esfahan agricultural research station 2003 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–232 e2 “dense corn population, lead to 26.2, 16 and 19.7 percent loss in pigweed LAI, TDM and WGR respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1156 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Dense corn population was associated with a 26.2% loss in pigweed leaf area in dex (LAI).
Treatmentdense corn population e2 Directiondecrease inferred e2 SettingEsfahan agricultural research station e1 Verbatim
e1 “a field experiment was carried out at Esfahan agricultural research station 2003 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–232 e2 “dense corn population, lead to 26.2, 16 and 19.7 percent loss in pigweed LAI, TDM and WGR respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1156 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.