View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Helianthus annuus ✕
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
High-B treatments decrease d root dry weight of sunflower.
Treatmenthigh-B treatments e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Knife-Cut Disease in Sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–76 e2 “The decrease in root dry weight in high-B treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–587 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The 60 mg Pb dm-3 treatment significantly decrease d sunflower dry weight content.
Treatment60 mg Pb dm-3 treatment e0 Outcomedry weight content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The highest 60 mg Pb dm-3 treatment was accompanied by a significant decrease in dry weight content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–774 t0 “sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–43 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Lead reduced root and shoot dry weight .
Outcomeroots and shoots dry weight e0 Verbatim
e0 “Compared with the control, Pb treatment caused a significant decrease in roots and shoots dry weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–637 t0 “Helianthus annuus L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–108 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
WD2 decrease d leaf area index and total dry weight in all studied sunflower hybrids.
Outcomeleaf area index (LAI) and total dry weight (TDW) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “application of WD2 and WD3 caused a decrease in leaf area index (LAI) and total dry weight (TDW) of all sunflower hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1353 t0 “sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
WD3 decrease d leaf area index and total dry weight in all studied sunflower hybrids.
Outcomeleaf area index (LAI) and total dry weight (TDW) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “application of WD2 and WD3 caused a decrease in leaf area index (LAI) and total dry weight (TDW) of all sunflower hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1353 t0 “sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 25 E.C., shoot dry weight decrease d by 30.26, 45.54 and 27.08%.
Verbatim
e0 “30.26, 45.54 and 27.08% in shoot dry weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–710 e1 “sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) cv. Suntech - 85 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–150 e2 “25 E.C. was deleterious and showed a decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–489 e3 “as compared to control at 30, 60 and 90 DAS respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–895 t0 “sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–78 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect At 5 E.C., all growth parameters increased slightly relative to control. Intervention effect At 25 E.C., shoot length fell by 20.96, 39.92 and 22.44% at 30, 60 and 90 DAS. Intervention effect At 25 E.C., root length decreased by 35.93, 33.33 and 31.50%. Intervention effect At 25 E.C., shoot fresh weight decreased by 56.46, 29.95 and 28.81%. Intervention effect At 25 E.C., root fresh weight decreased by 42.42, 51.28 and 34.73%. Intervention effect At 25 E.C., root dry weight decreased by 63.41, 55.00 and 57.29%. Intervention effect At 25 E.C., leaf number decreased by 44.82, 42.30 and 38.14%. Intervention effect At 25 E.C., leaf area decreased by 41.56, 33.04 and 40.00%. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 25 E.C., root dry weight decrease d by 63.41, 55.00 and 57.29%.
Verbatim
e0 “63.41, 55.00 and 57.29% in root dry weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–754 e1 “sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) cv. Suntech - 85 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–150 e2 “25 E.C. was deleterious and showed a decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–489 e3 “as compared to control at 30, 60 and 90 DAS respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–895 t0 “sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–78 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect At 5 E.C., all growth parameters increased slightly relative to control. Intervention effect At 25 E.C., shoot length fell by 20.96, 39.92 and 22.44% at 30, 60 and 90 DAS. Intervention effect At 25 E.C., root length decreased by 35.93, 33.33 and 31.50%. Intervention effect At 25 E.C., shoot fresh weight decreased by 56.46, 29.95 and 28.81%. Intervention effect At 25 E.C., root fresh weight decreased by 42.42, 51.28 and 34.73%. Intervention effect At 25 E.C., shoot dry weight decreased by 30.26, 45.54 and 27.08%. Intervention effect At 25 E.C., leaf number decreased by 44.82, 42.30 and 38.14%. Intervention effect At 25 E.C., leaf area decreased by 41.56, 33.04 and 40.00%. Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Uninoculated residue did not alter dry weight , protein or soluble amino acid content.
TreatmentADOR uninoculated e1 Outcomedry weight, protein and soluble amino acid content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–37 e0 “but did not alter the dry weight , protein and soluble amino acid content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–874 e1 “The roots germinated in ADOR uninoculated show a decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–673 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Uninoculated residue reduced sunflower root meristem size, length, fresh weight and cortex layers.
TreatmentADOR uninoculated e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–37 e0 “The roots germinated in ADOR uninoculated show a decrease in meristem size, resulting in a reduction of the root length and fresh weight , and in the number of layers forming the cortex ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–800 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Lead reduced leaf chlorophyll, catalase activity, potassium and calcium.
Outcomeleaves chlorophyll, catalase activity and K + , Ca 2+ amounts e0 Verbatim
e0 “leaves chlorophyll, catalase activity and K + , Ca 2+ amounts ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–700 t0 “Helianthus annuus L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–108 t1 “Compared with the control, Pb treatment caused a significant decrease in roots and shoots dry weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–637 Other claims from this paper (2) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.