View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Zea mays ✕
Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought significantly decrease d maize relative water content .
drought condition e0 relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “drought condition caused a significant decrease in biomass, total chlorophyll, relative water content (RWC) of the plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–983 t0 “Zea mays seedlings
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Exogenous Spd in hibited the decline in leaf relative water content under osmotic stress.
Exogenous Spd treatment e0 leaf relative water content e0 inhibited the decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Exogenous Spd treatment not only obviously in hibited the decrease of leaf relative water content ,but also in creased the content of soluble protein. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–814 t0 “Maize Seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought sharply decrease d relative water content and pigment content in maize seedlings relative to control.
Relative Water Content (RWC) e1 Sharp decrease e1 control condition e1 Verbatim
t0 “Drought in Maize (Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–116 e1 “Sharp decrease in Relative Water Content (RWC), Chl a, Chl b, carotenoid (Car) and total pigment content was observed under drought compared to control condition, while PAs application reversed their decreasing trends ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–578 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress reduced relative water content more in BN 1133, Dhanya and Swarna.
BN 1133, Dhanya and Swarna e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Water stress in duced decrease in RWC was greater in BN 1133, Dhanya and Swarna ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1491–1569 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Exogenous Spd in hibited the fall in leaf relative water content .
Exogenous Spd treatment e0 leaf relative water content e0 inhibited the decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Exogenous Spd treatment not only obviously in hibited the decrease of leaf relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–766 t0 “Effects of Polyamine on Leaf Physiological and Biochemical In dexes of Maize Seedlings under Osmotic Stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Deficit irrigation significantly reduced chlorophyll a, b and relative water content .
deficit irrigation e0 chlorophyll a, b and relative water content e0 normal irrigation e1 Verbatim
e0 “deficit irrigation caused a significant decrease in grain yield and other agronomic traits, physiological characteristics (chlorophyll a, b and relative water content ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–802 e1 “normal irrigation, 80% of maximum daily crop evapotranspiration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–503 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect Deficit irrigation significantly reduced maize grain yield and agronomic traits. Intervention effect Deficit irrigation significantly reduced leaf area index, crop growth rate and relative growth rate. Intervention effect Water deficit increased leaf rolling percentage. Intervention effect With stronger deficit, SC705 chlorophyll a, b and relative water content fell more than in SC703 and SC704. Observation At severe stress, SC705 leaf rolling reached 60%. Observation SC705 had the highest grain yield, 8.51 t/ha, under normal irrigation. Observation SC705 had the highest biomass, 19.36 t/ha, under normal irrigation. Observation SC705 had minimum grain yield and biomass at 50% ETc. Intervention effect Increasing deficit from normal irrigation to 50% ETc significantly reduced SC705 leaf area index, plant growth rate and relative growth rate. Intervention effect Increasing deficit from normal irrigation to 50% ETc significantly reduced SC705 net photosynthesis rate. Recommendation The authors recommend preventing water deficit at critical maize growth stages. Recommendation The authors advise planting SC705 when enough irrigation water is available. Recommendation The authors consider SC704 suitable for water deficit, especially at 50% ETc. Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content declined less in the sensitive maize genotype under moderate drought.
sensitive genotype e1 moderate drought conditions e0 relative water content e1 slighter decrease e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “two maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes with contrasting sensitivity to dehydration were subjected to moderate drought conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–242 e1 “a slighter decrease in the relative water content in the sensitive genotype ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–434 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf relative water content decrease d with salt, but the decline was not significant.
increasing salt e0 Leaf relative water content e0 Verbatim
e0 “Leaf relative water content decrease d with in creasing salt, but this decrease was not significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–957 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d relative water content and osmotic potential of maize leaves.
relative water content and osmotic potential of leaves e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Drought in duced a significant decrease of relative water content and osmotic potential of leaves, length and volume of roots, and total dry weight, but significantly in creased malondialdehyde in DH seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–535 e2 “Comparative physiological and proteomic analyses were conducted in the leaves of drought-tolerant Liyu 35 (LY) and drought-sensitive Denghai 605 (DH) maize genotype seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–326 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Deficit irrigation decrease d maize leaf chlorophyll, NDVI and relative water content .
defi cient irrigation e0 Leaf chlorophyll contents, the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and Leaf relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Leaf chlorophyll content s, the normalized difference vegetation in dex (NDVI) and Leaf relative water content (RWC) were decrease d by defi cient irrigation ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 515–669 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays