Paper · 2016 · Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences

Simulated drought influences oxidative stress in Zea mays seedlings

E.N Iwuala; R.N. Kanu; A.A Ajiboye; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Drought is an abiotic factor that limits the productivity of crop plants survival and productivity. This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of simulated drought on the malondialdehyde (MDA) and antioxidant enzymes activity in Zea mays. Seedlings were grown for 8 weeks in nursery bags filled with sandy-loam soil in two categories. Category 1 which serves as a control and received 300 ml of water every three days throughout the experimental period . Category 2 received 300ml of water every 2 days for 5 weeks before subjecting them to simulated drought. Physiological and metabolic parameters which include biomass, relative water content, total chlorophyll, oxidative damage and antioxidant enzyme activity were evaluated after the treatments. Analysis of variance at 0.05 significance level was used as the statistical tool. The results showed that drought condition caused a significant decrease in biomass, total chlorophyll, relative water content (RWC) of the plant and a significant increase in MDA level, and activity of catalase peroxidase. It was concluded that drought made water absorption by plants difficult and also induced oxidative stress in plants.Keywords: Catalase, drought, oxidative stress, seedlings, Zea mays

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly decreased maize biomass.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Treatment
drought conditione0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought condition caused a significant decrease in biomass, total chlorophyll, relative water content (RWC) of the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly decreased maize total chlorophyll.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Treatment
drought conditione0
Outcome
total chlorophylle0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought condition caused a significant decrease in biomass, total chlorophyll, relative water content (RWC) of the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly decreased maize relative water content.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Treatment
drought conditione0
Outcome
relative water content (RWC)e0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought condition caused a significant decrease in biomass, total chlorophyll, relative water content (RWC) of the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly increased maize MDA level.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Treatment
drought conditione1
Outcome
MDA levele0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant increase in MDA level, and activity of catalase peroxidase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1060 · show in text ↑
e1

“drought condition caused a significant decrease in biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–921 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly increased catalase peroxidase activity in maize.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Treatment
drought conditione1
Gene
catalase peroxidasee0
Outcome
activity of catalase peroxidasee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant increase in MDA level, and activity of catalase peroxidase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1060 · show in text ↑
e1

“drought condition caused a significant decrease in biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–921 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that drought impaired plant water absorption.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
water absorptione0
Direction
difficulte0

Verbatim

e0

“drought made water absorption by plants difficult”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1133 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that drought induced oxidative stress in plants.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
oxidative stresse0
Direction
inducede0

Verbatim

e0

“drought made water absorption by plants difficult and also induced oxidative stress in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1177 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 10 positive, 75 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

drought · physiology: oxidative · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

96 papers: 8 positive, 88 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

92 papers more in this group

See all 96 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 39 positive, 116 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

drought · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

385 papers: 77 positive, 308 negative or no effect

307 papers in the same direction as this paper · 77 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

381 papers more in this group

See all 385 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.