Paper · 1986 · Agronomy Journal

Effects of Water Deficits on Yield, Yield Components, and Water Use Efficiency of Irrigated Corn1

Harold V. Eck

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
115
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Irrigated corn ( Zea mays L.) is an important feed grain crop on the Southern High Plains where the supply of water for irrigation is declining. Limited irrigation‐applying less water than is required to meet potential evapotranspiration‐is extensively practiced on the drought tolerant crops of grain sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), and cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.). The purpose of this paper is (i) to report the effects of timing and duration of water deficit periods on growth and yield components of corn, (ii) to evaluate the seasonal evapotranspiration requirements of corn, and (iii) to give further information regarding the adaptation of corn for limited irrigation in a region of normally high evaporative demand climate. In a 4‐yr study, corn was grown under five irrigation treatments: adequate water, 2‐ and 4‐week water deficit periods during vegetative growth, and 2‐ and 4‐week water deficit periods during grain filling. Water deficits imposed 41 days after planting reduced leaf, stalk, and ear yields, while those imposed 55 days after planting reduced only stalk and ear yields. Deficits during vegetative growth reduced kernel numbers but had little effect on weight per kernel. Deficits during grain filling did not affect leaf and stalk yields but reduced ear yields. Kernel numbers were not affected by water deficits during grain filling unless severe deficits were imposed early in the period; thus, grain yield reductions were proportional to reductions in weight per kernel. With adequate water, seasonal water use averaged 964 mm on graded furrows and 834 mm in level borders. Although water use efficiency (WUE) was sometimes increased slightly when plants were subjected to water deficits, the data indicate that limited irrigation of corn would not be feasible on the Southern High Plains.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficits 41 days after planting reduced leaf, stalk and ear yields.

Treatment
Water deficits imposed 41 days after plantinge0
Outcome
leaf, stalk, and ear yieldse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water deficits imposed 41 days after planting reduced leaf, stalk, and ear yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 92–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficits 55 days after planting reduced stalk and ear yields.

Treatment
those imposed 55 days after plantinge0
Outcome
stalk and ear yieldse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“those imposed 55 days after planting reduced only stalk and ear yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 92–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetative-stage deficits reduced kernel numbers.

Treatment
Deficits during vegetative growthe0
Outcome
kernel numberse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deficits during vegetative growth reduced kernel numbers but had little effect on weight per kernel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1251 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 92–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetative-stage deficits had little effect on kernel weight.

Treatment
Deficits during vegetative growthe0
Outcome
weight per kernele0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deficits during vegetative growth reduced kernel numbers but had little effect on weight per kernel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1251 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 92–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain-filling deficits did not affect leaf and stalk yields.

Treatment
Deficits during grain fillinge0
Outcome
leaf and stalk yieldse0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deficits during grain filling did not affect leaf and stalk yields but reduced ear yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 92–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain-filling deficits reduced ear yields.

Treatment
Deficits during grain fillinge0
Outcome
ear yieldse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deficits during grain filling did not affect leaf and stalk yields but reduced ear yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 92–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kernel numbers were usually unaffected by grain-filling deficits except severe early deficits.

Treatment
water deficits during grain fillinge0
Outcome
Kernel numberse0
Direction
not affectede0
Qualifier
unless severe deficits were imposed early in the periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kernel numbers were not affected by water deficits during grain filling unless severe deficits were imposed early in the period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1470 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 92–96 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield reductions tracked reduced weight per kernel.

Organ / stage
kernele0
Outcome
grain yield reductionse0
Direction
reductionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield reductions were proportional to reductions in weight per kernel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1553 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 92–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With adequate water, seasonal water use averaged 964 mm on graded furrows.

Outcome
seasonal water usee0
Value
964 mme0
Setting
graded furrowse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With adequate water, seasonal water use averaged 964 mm on graded furrows and 834 mm in level borders.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1657 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 92–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With adequate water, seasonal water use averaged 834 mm in level borders.

Outcome
seasonal water usee0
Value
834 mme0
Setting
level borderse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With adequate water, seasonal water use averaged 964 mm on graded furrows and 834 mm in level borders.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1657 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 92–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficits sometimes increased water use efficiency slightly.

Treatment
water deficitse0
Outcome
water use efficiency (WUE)e0
Direction
increased slightlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water use efficiency (WUE) was sometimes increased slightly when plants were subjected to water deficits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1771 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 92–96 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judge limited corn irrigation infeasible on the Southern High Plains.

Outcome
limited irrigation of corne0
Setting
Southern High Plainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“limited irrigation of corn would not be feasible on the Southern High Plains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1796–1872 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 92–96 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 39 positive, 116 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 116 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

drought · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

353 papers: 53 positive, 300 negative or no effect

299 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

349 papers more in this group

See all 353 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.