Abstract
Abstract This research used The Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) to conduct a springtime field experiment at the College of Agriculture, University of Babylon. The second factor is irrigating while draining (50-75) percent of available water; the third is the use of two water stressors for water; and the fourth is the amino acids with four levels (zero, two hundred milligrams per milliliter (mg/l) proline; two hundred milligrams per milliliter (mg/l) arginine; and two hundred milligrams per milliliter (mg/l) mixed PPM). In comparison to the control group, plants treated with mycorrhizae grew taller (169.15 cm), had a higher chlorophyll index (48.378 Spad Unit), covered more ground (55.82 dm2), produced more biomass (5.45 tons of vegetative dry matter and 4.15 tons of root dry matter per hectare), and weighed significantly less (4.15) than control plants. Protein amino acid spray (treatment A3) resulted in the maximum plant height, chlorophyll index, leaf area, vegetative and root dry weight. The W1 water stress treatment resulted in significantly increased plant height (177.05 cm), chlorophyll index (49.52 Spad Unit), leaf area (52.54 dm2), vegetative dry weight (5.2 tons ha-1), and root dry weight (4.2 tons ha-1). The bi-interaction of water stress and bio fertilization with mycorrhizae resulted in the highest values for plant height, chlorophyll index, leaf area, and root dry weight in the M1W1 condition of corn.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizae-treated maize grew taller (169.15 cm) than controls.
- Treatment
- mycorrhizaee1
- Interactor
- mycorrhizaee1symbiont
- Outcome
- grew tallere1
- Direction
- increaseinferrede1
- Value
- 169.15 cme1
- Comparator
- control groupe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”
e1“In comparison to the control group, plants treated with mycorrhizae grew taller (169.15 cm), had a higher chlorophyll index (48.378 Spad Unit), covered more ground (55.82 dm2), produced more biomass (5.45 tons of vegetative dry matter and 4.15 tons of root dry matter per hectare), and weighed significantly less (4.15) than control plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizae-treated maize had a higher chlorophyll index (48.378 Spad Unit) than controls.
- Treatment
- mycorrhizaee1
- Interactor
- mycorrhizaee1symbiont
- Outcome
- chlorophyll indexe1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 48.378 Spad Unite1
- Comparator
- control groupe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”
e1“In comparison to the control group, plants treated with mycorrhizae grew taller (169.15 cm), had a higher chlorophyll index (48.378 Spad Unit), covered more ground (55.82 dm2), produced more biomass (5.45 tons of vegetative dry matter and 4.15 tons of root dry matter per hectare), and weighed significantly less (4.15) than control plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizae-treated maize covered more ground (55.82 dm2) than controls.
- Treatment
- mycorrhizaee1
- Interactor
- mycorrhizaee1symbiont
- Outcome
- covered more grounde1
- Direction
- moree1
- Value
- 55.82 dm2e1
- Comparator
- control groupe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”
e1“In comparison to the control group, plants treated with mycorrhizae grew taller (169.15 cm), had a higher chlorophyll index (48.378 Spad Unit), covered more ground (55.82 dm2), produced more biomass (5.45 tons of vegetative dry matter and 4.15 tons of root dry matter per hectare), and weighed significantly less (4.15) than control plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizae-treated maize produced more vegetative dry matter (5.45 tons per hectare) than controls.
- Treatment
- mycorrhizaee1
- Interactor
- mycorrhizaee1symbiont
- Outcome
- vegetative dry mattere1
- Direction
- moree1
- Value
- 5.45 tonse1
- Qualifier
- per hectaree1
- Comparator
- control groupe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”
e1“In comparison to the control group, plants treated with mycorrhizae grew taller (169.15 cm), had a higher chlorophyll index (48.378 Spad Unit), covered more ground (55.82 dm2), produced more biomass (5.45 tons of vegetative dry matter and 4.15 tons of root dry matter per hectare), and weighed significantly less (4.15) than control plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizae-treated maize produced more root dry matter (4.15 tons per hectare) than controls.
- Treatment
- mycorrhizaee1
- Interactor
- mycorrhizaee1symbiont
- Outcome
- root dry mattere1
- Direction
- moree1
- Value
- 4.15 tonse1
- Qualifier
- per hectaree1
- Comparator
- control groupe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”
e1“In comparison to the control group, plants treated with mycorrhizae grew taller (169.15 cm), had a higher chlorophyll index (48.378 Spad Unit), covered more ground (55.82 dm2), produced more biomass (5.45 tons of vegetative dry matter and 4.15 tons of root dry matter per hectare), and weighed significantly less (4.15) than control plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizae-treated maize weighed significantly less (4.15) than controls.
- Treatment
- mycorrhizaee1
- Interactor
- mycorrhizaee1symbiont
- Outcome
- weighede1
- Direction
- lesse1
- Value
- 4.15e1
- Comparator
- control groupe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”
e1“In comparison to the control group, plants treated with mycorrhizae grew taller (169.15 cm), had a higher chlorophyll index (48.378 Spad Unit), covered more ground (55.82 dm2), produced more biomass (5.45 tons of vegetative dry matter and 4.15 tons of root dry matter per hectare), and weighed significantly less (4.15) than control plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Protein amino acid spray gave the maximum plant height, chlorophyll index and leaf area in maize.
- Treatment
- Protein amino acid spraye3
- Outcome
- plant height, chlorophyll index, leaf areae3
- Direction
- maximume3
- Comparator
- zeroe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”
e2“the fourth is the amino acids with four levels (zero, two hundred milligrams per milliliter (mg/l) proline”
e3“Protein amino acid spray (treatment A3) resulted in the maximum plant height, chlorophyll index, leaf area, vegetative and root dry weight”
Claim · model-written summary
Protein amino acid spray gave the maximum vegetative and root dry weight in maize.
- Treatment
- Protein amino acid spraye3
- Outcome
- vegetative and root dry weighte3
- Direction
- maximume3
- Comparator
- zeroe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”
e2“the fourth is the amino acids with four levels (zero, two hundred milligrams per milliliter (mg/l) proline”
e3“Protein amino acid spray (treatment A3) resulted in the maximum plant height, chlorophyll index, leaf area, vegetative and root dry weight”
Claim · model-written summary
W1 water stress significantly increased maize plant height (177.05 cm).
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”
e4“The W1 water stress treatment resulted in significantly increased plant height (177.05 cm), chlorophyll index (49.52 Spad Unit), leaf area (52.54 dm2), vegetative dry weight (5.2 tons ha-1), and root dry weight (4.2 tons ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
W1 water stress significantly increased maize chlorophyll index (49.52 Spad Unit).
- Treatment
- W1 water stress treatmente4
- Outcome
- chlorophyll indexe4
- Direction
- increasede4
- Value
- 49.52 Spad Unite4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”
e4“The W1 water stress treatment resulted in significantly increased plant height (177.05 cm), chlorophyll index (49.52 Spad Unit), leaf area (52.54 dm2), vegetative dry weight (5.2 tons ha-1), and root dry weight (4.2 tons ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
W1 water stress significantly increased maize leaf area (52.54 dm2).
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”
e4“The W1 water stress treatment resulted in significantly increased plant height (177.05 cm), chlorophyll index (49.52 Spad Unit), leaf area (52.54 dm2), vegetative dry weight (5.2 tons ha-1), and root dry weight (4.2 tons ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
W1 water stress significantly increased maize vegetative dry weight (5.2 tons per hectare).
- Treatment
- W1 water stress treatmente4
- Outcome
- vegetative dry weighte4
- Direction
- increasede4
- Value
- 5.2 tons ha-1e4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”
e4“The W1 water stress treatment resulted in significantly increased plant height (177.05 cm), chlorophyll index (49.52 Spad Unit), leaf area (52.54 dm2), vegetative dry weight (5.2 tons ha-1), and root dry weight (4.2 tons ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
W1 water stress significantly increased maize root dry weight (4.2 tons per hectare).
- Treatment
- W1 water stress treatmente4
- Outcome
- root dry weighte4
- Direction
- increasede4
- Value
- 4.2 tons ha-1e4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”
e4“The W1 water stress treatment resulted in significantly increased plant height (177.05 cm), chlorophyll index (49.52 Spad Unit), leaf area (52.54 dm2), vegetative dry weight (5.2 tons ha-1), and root dry weight (4.2 tons ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined water stress and mycorrhizal bio-fertilization gave the highest plant height, chlorophyll index, leaf area and root dry weight in corn.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse5
- Treatment
- water stress and bio fertilization with mycorrhizaee5
- Interactor
- mycorrhizaee5symbiont
- Outcome
- plant height, chlorophyll index, leaf area, and root dry weighte5
- Direction
- higheste5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”
e5“The bi-interaction of water stress and bio fertilization with mycorrhizae resulted in the highest values for plant height, chlorophyll index, leaf area, and root dry weight in the M1W1 condition of corn”
The same questions in other papers
amino acid · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
amino acid · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →mycorrhiza · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →drought · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
81 papers more in this group
See all 85 papers →application · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
83 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
85 papers more in this group
See all 89 papers →fertilization · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
156 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
167 papers more in this group
See all 171 papers →mycorrhiza · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
168 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
184 papers more in this group
See all 188 papers →application · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
309 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
333 papers more in this group
See all 337 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.