Paper · 2023 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids

Luay Manhal Chfat; Mohammed Sallal Oleiwi

14
claims
30
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract This research used The Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) to conduct a springtime field experiment at the College of Agriculture, University of Babylon. The second factor is irrigating while draining (50-75) percent of available water; the third is the use of two water stressors for water; and the fourth is the amino acids with four levels (zero, two hundred milligrams per milliliter (mg/l) proline; two hundred milligrams per milliliter (mg/l) arginine; and two hundred milligrams per milliliter (mg/l) mixed PPM). In comparison to the control group, plants treated with mycorrhizae grew taller (169.15 cm), had a higher chlorophyll index (48.378 Spad Unit), covered more ground (55.82 dm2), produced more biomass (5.45 tons of vegetative dry matter and 4.15 tons of root dry matter per hectare), and weighed significantly less (4.15) than control plants. Protein amino acid spray (treatment A3) resulted in the maximum plant height, chlorophyll index, leaf area, vegetative and root dry weight. The W1 water stress treatment resulted in significantly increased plant height (177.05 cm), chlorophyll index (49.52 Spad Unit), leaf area (52.54 dm2), vegetative dry weight (5.2 tons ha-1), and root dry weight (4.2 tons ha-1). The bi-interaction of water stress and bio fertilization with mycorrhizae resulted in the highest values for plant height, chlorophyll index, leaf area, and root dry weight in the M1W1 condition of corn.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizae-treated maize grew taller (169.15 cm) than controls.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
mycorrhizaee1
Interactor
mycorrhizaee1symbiont
Outcome
grew tallere1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
169.15 cme1
Comparator
control groupe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison to the control group, plants treated with mycorrhizae grew taller (169.15 cm), had a higher chlorophyll index (48.378 Spad Unit), covered more ground (55.82 dm2), produced more biomass (5.45 tons of vegetative dry matter and 4.15 tons of root dry matter per hectare), and weighed significantly less (4.15) than control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizae-treated maize had a higher chlorophyll index (48.378 Spad Unit) than controls.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
mycorrhizaee1
Interactor
mycorrhizaee1symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll indexe1
Direction
highere1
Value
48.378 Spad Unite1
Comparator
control groupe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison to the control group, plants treated with mycorrhizae grew taller (169.15 cm), had a higher chlorophyll index (48.378 Spad Unit), covered more ground (55.82 dm2), produced more biomass (5.45 tons of vegetative dry matter and 4.15 tons of root dry matter per hectare), and weighed significantly less (4.15) than control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizae-treated maize covered more ground (55.82 dm2) than controls.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
mycorrhizaee1
Interactor
mycorrhizaee1symbiont
Outcome
covered more grounde1
Direction
moree1
Value
55.82 dm2e1
Comparator
control groupe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison to the control group, plants treated with mycorrhizae grew taller (169.15 cm), had a higher chlorophyll index (48.378 Spad Unit), covered more ground (55.82 dm2), produced more biomass (5.45 tons of vegetative dry matter and 4.15 tons of root dry matter per hectare), and weighed significantly less (4.15) than control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizae-treated maize produced more vegetative dry matter (5.45 tons per hectare) than controls.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
mycorrhizaee1
Interactor
mycorrhizaee1symbiont
Outcome
vegetative dry mattere1
Direction
moree1
Value
5.45 tonse1
Qualifier
per hectaree1
Comparator
control groupe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison to the control group, plants treated with mycorrhizae grew taller (169.15 cm), had a higher chlorophyll index (48.378 Spad Unit), covered more ground (55.82 dm2), produced more biomass (5.45 tons of vegetative dry matter and 4.15 tons of root dry matter per hectare), and weighed significantly less (4.15) than control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizae-treated maize produced more root dry matter (4.15 tons per hectare) than controls.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
mycorrhizaee1
Interactor
mycorrhizaee1symbiont
Outcome
root dry mattere1
Direction
moree1
Value
4.15 tonse1
Qualifier
per hectaree1
Comparator
control groupe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison to the control group, plants treated with mycorrhizae grew taller (169.15 cm), had a higher chlorophyll index (48.378 Spad Unit), covered more ground (55.82 dm2), produced more biomass (5.45 tons of vegetative dry matter and 4.15 tons of root dry matter per hectare), and weighed significantly less (4.15) than control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizae-treated maize weighed significantly less (4.15) than controls.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
mycorrhizaee1
Interactor
mycorrhizaee1symbiont
Outcome
weighede1
Direction
lesse1
Value
4.15e1
Comparator
control groupe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison to the control group, plants treated with mycorrhizae grew taller (169.15 cm), had a higher chlorophyll index (48.378 Spad Unit), covered more ground (55.82 dm2), produced more biomass (5.45 tons of vegetative dry matter and 4.15 tons of root dry matter per hectare), and weighed significantly less (4.15) than control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein amino acid spray gave the maximum plant height, chlorophyll index and leaf area in maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Protein amino acid spraye3
Outcome
plant height, chlorophyll index, leaf areae3
Direction
maximume3
Comparator
zeroe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e2

“the fourth is the amino acids with four levels (zero, two hundred milligrams per milliliter (mg/l) proline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–415 · show in text ↑
e3

“Protein amino acid spray (treatment A3) resulted in the maximum plant height, chlorophyll index, leaf area, vegetative and root dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein amino acid spray gave the maximum vegetative and root dry weight in maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Protein amino acid spraye3
Outcome
vegetative and root dry weighte3
Direction
maximume3
Comparator
zeroe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e2

“the fourth is the amino acids with four levels (zero, two hundred milligrams per milliliter (mg/l) proline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–415 · show in text ↑
e3

“Protein amino acid spray (treatment A3) resulted in the maximum plant height, chlorophyll index, leaf area, vegetative and root dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

W1 water stress significantly increased maize plant height (177.05 cm).

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
W1 water stress treatmente4
Outcome
plant heighte4
Direction
increasede4
Value
177.05 cme4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e4

“The W1 water stress treatment resulted in significantly increased plant height (177.05 cm), chlorophyll index (49.52 Spad Unit), leaf area (52.54 dm2), vegetative dry weight (5.2 tons ha-1), and root dry weight (4.2 tons ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

W1 water stress significantly increased maize chlorophyll index (49.52 Spad Unit).

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
W1 water stress treatmente4
Outcome
chlorophyll indexe4
Direction
increasede4
Value
49.52 Spad Unite4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e4

“The W1 water stress treatment resulted in significantly increased plant height (177.05 cm), chlorophyll index (49.52 Spad Unit), leaf area (52.54 dm2), vegetative dry weight (5.2 tons ha-1), and root dry weight (4.2 tons ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

W1 water stress significantly increased maize leaf area (52.54 dm2).

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
W1 water stress treatmente4
Outcome
leaf areae4
Direction
increasede4
Value
52.54 dm2e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e4

“The W1 water stress treatment resulted in significantly increased plant height (177.05 cm), chlorophyll index (49.52 Spad Unit), leaf area (52.54 dm2), vegetative dry weight (5.2 tons ha-1), and root dry weight (4.2 tons ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

W1 water stress significantly increased maize vegetative dry weight (5.2 tons per hectare).

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
W1 water stress treatmente4
Outcome
vegetative dry weighte4
Direction
increasede4
Value
5.2 tons ha-1e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e4

“The W1 water stress treatment resulted in significantly increased plant height (177.05 cm), chlorophyll index (49.52 Spad Unit), leaf area (52.54 dm2), vegetative dry weight (5.2 tons ha-1), and root dry weight (4.2 tons ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

W1 water stress significantly increased maize root dry weight (4.2 tons per hectare).

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
W1 water stress treatmente4
Outcome
root dry weighte4
Direction
increasede4
Value
4.2 tons ha-1e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e4

“The W1 water stress treatment resulted in significantly increased plant height (177.05 cm), chlorophyll index (49.52 Spad Unit), leaf area (52.54 dm2), vegetative dry weight (5.2 tons ha-1), and root dry weight (4.2 tons ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined water stress and mycorrhizal bio-fertilization gave the highest plant height, chlorophyll index, leaf area and root dry weight in corn.

Treatment
water stress and bio fertilization with mycorrhizaee5
Interactor
mycorrhizaee5symbiont
Outcome
plant height, chlorophyll index, leaf area, and root dry weighte5
Direction
higheste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Growth Characteristics of Maize were Affected by Inoculation with Mycorrhizae and Spraying with Amino Acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e5

“The bi-interaction of water stress and bio fertilization with mycorrhizae resulted in the highest values for plant height, chlorophyll index, leaf area, and root dry weight in the M1W1 condition of corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1444 · show in text ↑

amino acid · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

amino acid · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 10 positive, 75 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 84 positive, 5 negative or no effect

83 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

171 papers: 157 positive, 14 negative or no effect

156 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

188 papers: 169 positive, 19 negative or no effect

168 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

184 papers more in this group

See all 188 papers →

application · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

337 papers: 310 positive, 27 negative or no effect

309 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

333 papers more in this group

See all 337 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.