Claim · model-written summary
AM inoculation did not increase N uptake or chlorophyll.
- Treatment
- Mycorrhizal inoculatione0
- Interactor
- Mycorrhizale0symbiont
- Outcome
- N uptake nor chlorophyll content in leavese0
- Direction
- neither increasede0
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mycorrhizal inoculation had a positive impact on maize plant P uptake, but neither increased N uptake nor chlorophyll content in leaves.”
Title
Roberto Crespo Lincoln (University of Nebraska) 2015
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Observation Inoculated maize roots had about 70% AM colonization.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen fertilization increased AM colonization compared with unfertilized plants.
- Observation Colonization and biomarker concentration were similar across maize hybrids.
- Intervention effect AM inoculation increased maize P uptake.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen raised plant P concentration under AM inoculation.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen lowered plant P concentration without AM inoculation.
- Intervention effect Increasing nitrogen increased plant biomass and chlorophyll.
- Intervention effect Phosphorus fertilization did not produce positive biomass and chlorophyll responses.
- Observation Indigenous AM fungi colonized maize roots similarly across genotype and water conditions.
- Intervention effect Water limitation increased soil extramatrical AM biomass.
- Intervention effect Water limitation shifted the overall soil microbial community.
- Association Maize hybrids influenced specific microbial groups.
- Intervention effect Water stress increased bacterial and actinomycete markers and microbial biomass.