View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The rice yield of the crimson clover 2 + hairy vetch plot was not significantly different from the conventional practice plot .
CC 2 + hairy vetch e5 not significantly different e5 conventional practice plot e5 Verbatim
e5 “The rice yield of CC 2 + hairy vetch $5kg\;10a^{-1}$ plot was not significantly different from conventional practice plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2233–2354 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Wheat plot s behind maize had no significant border versus inner plot yield difference.
no significant differences e0 border plot or inner plot e0 Verbatim
e0 “When wheat was cultivated behind maize, there were no significant differences in the yield , if the plot was a border plot or inner plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3686–3821 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Biological yield per plot did not differ significantly across genotypes.
biological yield plot-1 e0 Verbatim
e0 “except biological yield plot -1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–596 t0 “Bread Wheat Genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–131 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Orienting corn seed at planting did not show a plot -level yield advantage.
orienting corn seed at planting e4 plot level yield e4 did not show an advantage e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e4 “The plot level yield did not show an advantage to orienting corn seed at planting ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–797 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fruit number and size changes did not affect overall yield per plot area.
overall yield per plot area e0 did not have an effect e0 Verbatim
e0 “which did not have an effect on overall yield per plot area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1438 t0 “tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Plot shape did not affect the precision of wheat yield trials in most cases in the two seasons.
precision of wheat yield trial e7 did not affect e7 Verbatim
e0 “were to estimate the optimum plot size, plot shape andnumber of replicates for wheat yield traits using the variety Sakha 93 as plantmaterial ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–366 e7 “the plot shapedid not affect on the precision of wheat yield trial in most cases in the twogrowing seasons ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2726–2832 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Pod yield per plot did not differ significantly across plant densities.
different plant densities e0 pod yield per plot e0 no significant difference e0 Verbatim
e0 “there was no significant difference in the pod yield per plot in different plant densities. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–894 t0 “pea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–83 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Line resistance showed weak correlation with yield when all plot data were used.
no_change inferred e5 Verbatim
t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 e5 “Lines resistance showed weak correlation with yield when all plot data were used for calculation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1284 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The conventional plot experiment found no significant grain- yield difference between treatments.
grain yield difference e0 between the treatments e0 Verbatim
e0 “When a conventional plot experiment was set up in the same field, no statistically significant grain yield difference between the treatments was found. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1580–1731 t0 “plot experiments in maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–498 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Small plot yield did not respond to strip till compared with no till.
no yield response e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was no yield response of strip-till compared with no-till in the small- plot study. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–319 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–77 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Oryza sativa
Triticum aestivum
Zea mays
Zea mays subsp. mays
Solanum lycopersicum
Lathyrus oleraceus
Glycine max