View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: corn ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing density decrease d grains per ear.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease of grains per ear ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1967–1993 t0 “corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect Source-sink restriction and density significantly affected photosynthesis and assimilate remobilization rate, contribution and efficiency. Observation The untreated control had the highest grain yield, 868.67 g/m 2. Observation Removing 50% of the ear gave the lowest grain yield, 646.33 g/m 2. Intervention effect Removing 50% of the ear significantly decreased grain numbers but increased 1000-grain weight. Intervention effect Removing 50% of the ear increased 1000-grain weight. Observation Ear removal produced the lowest remobilization rate and contribution, 9.9%. Observation Defoliating upper leaves produced the highest remobilization rate and contribution, 39.31%. Observation Upper-leaf defoliation significantly decreased photosynthesis contribution to 60.69%. Intervention effect Increasing density significantly increased grain yield. Intervention effect Increasing density increased grains per square meter and 1000-grain weight. Observation At 90000 plants per hectare, grain yield was highest at 886.33 g/m 2. Observation At 90000 plants per hectare, photosynthesis contribution was lowest at 71.74%. Observation At 90000 plants per hectare, remobilization contribution was highest at 28.26%. Observation Upper-leaf defoliation at 90000 plants per hectare gave the highest remobilization contribution, 43.37%. Observation Upper-leaf defoliation at 90000 plants per hectare gave the lowest photosynthesis contribution, 56.63%. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Corn density decrease d after pre-cleaning.
Treatmentpre-cleaning process e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “CHEMICAL AND ENERGETIC CONTENT OF CORN BEFORE AND AFTER PRE-CLEANING ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 e0 “There was a decrease in density after the pre-cleaning process ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1301 Other claims from this paper (6) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in bulk density with gypsum is attributed to a greater in crease in porosity relative to 1,000-grain weight.
Qualifiera greater increase in porosity in relation to weight of 1,000 grains e3 Verbatim
e2 “corn irrigated with in creasing doses of gypsum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–505 e3 “the decrease in bulk density in function of the in crease of gypsum doses is attributed to a greater in crease in porosity in relation to weight of 1,000 grains ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1491 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
150% more than optimum density decrease d weed density by 27.5%
Treatment150% more than optimum density e0 Verbatim
e0 “In crease of density of mungbean from 50% in to 150% more than optimum density , decrease the density and dry weight of weeds, 27.5% and 22%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1306 t0 “corn (Zea mays ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–101 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing density decrease d soil water storage.
Treatmentincreasing corn density e0 Outcomesoil water storage e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53 e0 “both in creasing corn density and applying plastic film mulching can in crease the corn yield,but lead to the decrease in soil water storage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1334 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At higher density with nitrogen raised to 30 kg, corn production began to decline, but the decrease was not significant.
Treatmentnitrogen dosage increased to 30 kg e5 Directionbegan to decline e5 Qualifierhigher density(more than 4 000 plants per 667 m2) e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “This study adopted the method of split-plot experiment design,researched the directional cultivating conditions,planting density and fertilizer levels for semi-compact corn Pacific 98 and its effect on yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–207 e5 “in the higher density (more than 4 000 plants per 667 m2)and nitrogen dosage in creased to 30 kg,the production began to decline,but the decrease was not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–806 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
150% more than optimum density decrease d weed dry weight of weeds by 22%
Treatment150% more than optimum density e0 Outcomedry weight of weeds e0 Verbatim
e0 “In crease of density of mungbean from 50% in to 150% more than optimum density , decrease the density and dry weight of weeds, 27.5% and 22%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1306 t0 “corn (Zea mays ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–101 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Bulk density of corn grains decrease d as gypsum doses in creased.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e2 “corn irrigated with in creasing doses of gypsum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–505 e3 “the decrease in bulk density in function of the in crease of gypsum doses is attributed to a greater in crease in porosity in relation to weight of 1,000 grains ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1491 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Emergence declined significantly with density above 600 eggs.
Treatmentviable egg densities e0 Outcomepercentage of emergence e0 Verbatim
e0 “as viable egg densities in creased from 600 to 2400 per 30.5 cm there was a significant decrease in percentage of emergence. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1304 t0 “Western Corn Rootworm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–80 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing leaf growth parameters were associated with decrease d stomatal density in corn.
Verbatim
e0 “The in crease in leaf growing parameters led to in crease in SW, SL and SS values but decrease in SD ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–726 t0 “Corn (Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–83 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.