View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: maize ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
In creased N supply weakened the decrease in KNP and TKW caused by enhanced density .
TreatmentIncreased N supply e0 Outcomedecreased KNP and TKW caused by enhanced density e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 e0 “In creased N supply weakened the decrease d KNP and TKW caused by enhanced density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1018 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 45 cm spacing, maize yield tended to decrease with in creasing density in 2014.
Treatmentincreasing plant densities e0 Directiondecreasing tendency e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 e0 “in 2014, the yield showed decreasing tendency parallel to the in creasing plant densities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1611–1699 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
In maize–legume in tercrops the decrease in available light for weeds led to a reduction of weed density and dry matter compared with sole crops.
Treatmentmaize–legume intercrops e0 Outcomeweed density and dry matter e0 Verbatim
e0 “in maize–legume in tercrops the decrease in available light for weeds led to a reduction of weed density and dry matter, compared to sole crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–931 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing plant density decrease d leaf angle in maize.
TreatmentIncreasing plant density e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Morphological Variation of Maize Cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–42 e1 “In creasing plant density resulted in a decrease in leaf angle; however, an in crease in LOV ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1270 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mulching decrease d bulk density .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Mulching showed improvement in organic C and total N status, and a decrease in bulk density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1351 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 t1 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher density decrease d yield and yield components per plant.
Treatmentincrease in density e0 Outcomeyield and yield components per plant e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in crease in density resulted in in crease in yield per hectare and decrease in yield and yield components per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–544 e1 “Maize (Zea mays ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–142 Other claims from this paper (15) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Total ear florets, silking florets, and silking rates decrease d slightly as density in creased.
Treatmentplant density increasing e0 OutcomeTotal florets, silking florets, and silking rates of ear e0 Verbatim
e0 “Total florets, silking florets, and silking rates of ear showed slightly decrease trends with the plant density in creasing ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1095 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
In maize, leaf width decrease d more than leaf length under in creased plant density .
Outcomedecrease in width e1 Verbatim
t0 “Morphological Variation of Maize Cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–42 e1 “The decrease in width was greater than in length ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1122 e2 “The leaf length and width decrease d as plant density in creased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1072 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Organic amendments reduced soil bulk density relative to the control.
Verbatim
e0 “significant (p ≤0.05) decrease in bulk density and in crease in total porosity in amended soil relative to the T1 (control) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–641 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Both modes reduced soil volume weight and density at 10–30 cm.
TreatmentDeep Loosening t0 Outcomevolume weight of soil and soil density e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease the volume weight of soil and soil density in 10-30 cm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–312 t0 “Deep Loosening Mode on Soil Physical Characteristics and Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–72 Other claims from this paper (16) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.