Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“repeatability”

6 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

1970 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specificity, selectivity and repeatability remained unchanged in multiplex versus singleplex RT-qPCR.

Taxon: Hopst0
Outcome: specificity, selectivity, repeatabilitye0
Direction: remained unchangede0
Comparator: singleplex RT-qPCRe0

Verbatim

e0
“Method validation showed that mRT-qPCR had lower sensitivity than singleplex RT-qPCR, while specificity, selectivity, repeatability, and reproducibility remained unchanged.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1376

t0
“Hops (Humulus lupulus)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 175–197

Title

Optimization and Validation of Singleplex and Multiplex RT-qPCR for Detection of Citrus bark cracking viroid (CBCVd), Hop latent viroid (HLVd), and Hop stunt viroid (HSVd) in Hops (Humulus lupulus)

Tanja Guček; Jernej Jakše; Sebastjan Radišek Plant Disease 2023. doi:10.1094/pdis-11-22-2606-re

Other claims from this paper (3)

Method / resource Multiplex RT-qPCR had lower sensitivity than singleplex RT-qPCR.
Method / resource Reproducibility remained unchanged in multiplex versus singleplex RT-qPCR.
Method / resource The new assays were considered robust and suitable for large-scale viroid screening.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Models trained for broad growth stages did not significantly increase accuracy.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome: accuracye0
Direction: did not significantly increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“models trained for broad-growth stages did not significantly increase accuracy”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–978

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78

Title

Prediction accuracy and repeatability of UAV based biomass estimation in wheat variety trials as affected by variable type, modelling strategy and sampling location

Daniel T. L. Smith; Qiaomin Chen; Sean Reynolds Massey-Reed; et al. Plant Methods 2024. doi:10.1186/s13007-024-01236-w

Other claims from this paper (5)

Method / resource Combining geometric and spectral traits increased biomass prediction accuracy.
Method / resource RFE selection slightly reduced accuracy while increasing interpretability.
Method / resource Experiment specific models had higher accuracy than pooled models.
Method / resource Permanent and precise plot regions yielded negligible accuracy differences.
Method / resource Within season repeatability differed significantly among experiments.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Permanent and precise plot regions yielded negligible accuracy differences.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome: biomass prediction accuracye0
Direction: negligible differencese0
Comparator: a permanent and a precise region of interest (ROI)e0

Verbatim

e0
“The comparison between a permanent and a precise region of interest (ROI) within the plot showed negligible differences in biomass prediction accuracy”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1130

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78

Title

Prediction accuracy and repeatability of UAV based biomass estimation in wheat variety trials as affected by variable type, modelling strategy and sampling location

Daniel T. L. Smith; Qiaomin Chen; Sean Reynolds Massey-Reed; et al. Plant Methods 2024. doi:10.1186/s13007-024-01236-w

Other claims from this paper (5)

Method / resource Combining geometric and spectral traits increased biomass prediction accuracy.
Method / resource RFE selection slightly reduced accuracy while increasing interpretability.
Method / resource Experiment specific models had higher accuracy than pooled models.
Method / resource Models trained for broad growth stages did not significantly increase accuracy.
Method / resource Within season repeatability differed significantly among experiments.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

QAMS and ESM did not differ significantly in quantifying four anthraquinone components.

Taxon: Polygonum multiflorumPleuropterus multifloruse0
Outcome: quantification of the four main componentse1
Direction: no significant differencee1
Comparator: ESMe1

Verbatim

e0
“in Polygonum multiflorum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–207

e1
“there was no significant difference between QAMS and ESM for quantification of the four main components by using relative error results, and the QAMS method was accurate and reliable, and had a good repeatability.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–995

Title

[Simultaneous determination of four anthraquinones in Polygonum multiflorum by QAMS].

Wen-Wen Hou; Yan-Hong Shi; Yan Song; et al. PubMed 2020. doi:10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20191014.201

Other claims from this paper (4)

Method / resource The QAMS method was accurate, reliable and repeatable.
Method / resource Direct QAMS determination of combined anthraquinone closely matched the external standard method.
Recommendation The authors considered QAMS suitable for evaluating P. multiflorum quality.
Recommendation The authors proposed replacing the Pharmacopoeia combined-anthraquinone assay with the optimized assay.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reproducibility remained unchanged in multiplex versus singleplex RT-qPCR.

Taxon: Hopst0
Outcome: reproducibilitye0
Direction: remained unchangede0
Comparator: singleplex RT-qPCRe0

Verbatim

e0
“Method validation showed that mRT-qPCR had lower sensitivity than singleplex RT-qPCR, while specificity, selectivity, repeatability, and reproducibility remained unchanged.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1376

t0
“Hops (Humulus lupulus)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 175–197

Title

Tanja Guček; Jernej Jakše; Sebastjan Radišek Plant Disease 2023. doi:10.1094/pdis-11-22-2606-re

Other claims from this paper (3)

Method / resource Multiplex RT-qPCR had lower sensitivity than singleplex RT-qPCR.
Method / resource Specificity, selectivity and repeatability remained unchanged in multiplex versus singleplex RT-qPCR.
Method / resource The new assays were considered robust and suitable for large-scale viroid screening.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plot end trimming never gave significantly different outcomes from non-trimmed plots.

Taxon: maize and sorghumSorghum Zea mayst0
Treatment: Plot end trimming of 40 cme0
Outcome: outcomese1
Direction: no_changeinferrede1
Comparator: non-trimmed plotse1

Verbatim

t0
“Row selection in remote sensing from four-row plots of maize and sorghum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72

e0
“Plot end trimming of 40 cm was an additional factor tested”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1223

e1
“Plot trimming was never shown to result in significantly different outcomes from non-trimmed plots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1439

Title

Row selection in remote sensing from four-row plots of maize and sorghum based on repeatability and predictive modeling

Seth A. Tolley; Neal Carpenter; Melba M. Crawford; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2023. doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1202536

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Row selection often gave significant differences in trial outcomes.
Intervention effect Plots with more row segments often increased repeatability.
Intervention effect Excluding outer rows improved predictive modeling.
Recommendation Long-standing principles of experimental design in agronomy should be considered in breeding programs that use remote sensing.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“repeatability”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics