View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Biological yield per plot was positively correlated with grain yield per plot at 0.932.
grain yield per plot e0 biological yield per plot e0 Verbatim
e0 “positive associations of number of tillers per meter (0.487), harvest index (0.499) and biological yield per plot (0.932) with grain yield per plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1482 e1 “Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Biological yield per plot and grain yield per plot had high heritability and genetic advance.
biological yield per plot, and grain yield per plot e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “biological yield per plot , and grain yield per plot have high heritability coupled with high genetic advance as a per cent of mean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1064 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield per plot positively correlated with biological yield per plot under moisture stress, r = 0.93.
Grain yield per plot e0 positively correlated e0 biological yield per plot e0 Verbatim
e0 “Grain yield per plot was positively correlated (r = 0.93) with biological yield per plot in MS conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1218 t0 “Evaluation of Bread Wheat Genotypes for Water Stress Tolerance Using Agronomic Traits ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–85 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield per hectare was significantly and positively correlated with grain yield per plot and straw yield per plot .
grain yield per plot and straw yield per plot e1 Verbatim
t0 “finger millet (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–84 e1 “The genotypic and phenotypic correlation of grain yield /ha was significant and positive with number of tillers per plant, length of finger, harvest index, grain yield per plot and straw yield per plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–362 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
T5 yield per plot was 5.15 kg plot −1.
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “yield per plot (5.15 kg plot −1) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1115 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Testers differed significantly for green fodder yield per plot and grain yield per plot .
green fodder yield per plot and grain yield per plot e3 Verbatim
e0 “Four inbred lines of teosinte ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–250 e3 “While testers were varied significantly for green fodder yield per plot and grain yield per plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–833 Other claims from this paper (19) Observation Significant differences among crosses were found for all studied traits. Observation Lines differed significantly for 100-grain weight and grain yield per plot. Observation Cross × year and L × T × year interactions were significant for all studied traits, except number of tillers per plant (cross × year) and crude protein (L × T × year). Association Parent of inbred line-1 had the highest positive and significant GCA effect for TDN, 100-grain weight and grain yield per plot. Association Parent of inbred line-1 showed desirable GCA for number of tassling date (toward earliness). Association Line-3 had positive and significant GCA for green fodder yield per plot and 100-grain weight. Association The 30k8 (T1) tester was a good general combiner for 100-grain weight, crude protein and grain yield per plot. Association T2 and T3 testers were good general combiners for green fodder yield per plot and TDN. Association Top cross L1 × T3 had the highest SCA effects for TDN, number of tillers per plant and tassling date (toward earliness). Association Top cross L1 × T3 had the highest SCA effects for crude protein and grain yield per plot. Association General combining ability variance (σ²GCA) was larger than specific combining ability variance (σ²SCA) for green fodder yield per plot, 100-grain weight and grain yield per plot. Association σ²SCA was larger than σ²GCA for TDN, number of tillers per plant and plant height. Association σ²SCA was larger than σ²GCA for tassling date and crude protein percentage. Association All topcrosses were superior to their parents of teosinte for green fodder yield per plot and tassling date (toward earliness), except (L2 × T2) and (L2 × T3). Association All topcrosses were superior to their parents of teosinte for grain yield per plot and 100-grain weight, except (L2 × T2) and (L2 × T3). Association All topcrosses were superior to their parents of teosinte for crude protein, except (L2 × T3). Observation Top crosses for crude protein were L2 × T1, L3 × T1 and L4 × T1; for grain yield per plot they were L1 × T3, L1 × T2, L4 × T1, L2 × T1 and L3 × T1. Recommendation Top crosses can be used for improvement in green fodder yield and grain yield, for silage in the dough stage. Recommendation Inbred lines L1 and L3 could be recommended for advanced stage of evaluation through the breeding program. Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sowing time significantly affected yield per plot .
Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
t0 “SOYBEAN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 e0 “yield per plot significantly affected by sowing time ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1273 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Correlation between Wr+Vr and Yr was negative for yield per plant, yield per plot and early yield per plot .
correlation between Wr+Vr and Yr e1 yield per plant,yield per plot,early yield per plot e1 Verbatim
t0 “Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–86 e0 “Six pepper(Capsicam annuum L.) parents were used to produce 15 combinations by diallel crosses excluding reciprocals ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–116 e1 “Correlation analysis showed that there was a negative correlation between Wr+Vr and Yr in the characters of yield per plant, yield per plot ,early yield per plot and dry matter content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–615 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Per plant and per plot yield showed more obvious variation among economic traits.
per plant yield and per plot yield e0 more obvious variances e0 Verbatim
e0 “the per plant yield and per plot yield showed more obvious variances ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1240 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
More two-shoot plants per plot increased yield per plot .
more the 2-training shoot plant e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The more the 2-training shoot plant is in plot , the more the fruit number and yield per plot were increased. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–633 t0 “Sweet Pepper ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–136 Other claims from this paper (18) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cucumber parents differed in diversity for yield per plot , fruit number per plot and fruit length.
yield per plot, fruit number per plot, fruit length e1 Verbatim
t0 “cucumber ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 e1 “Significant differences in the parents indicated that the majority of the parents had diversity for yield per plot , fruit number per plot , fruit length, days to female flower appearance, node number, number of shoots and vine length ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–428 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield per plot had lower heritability in sunflower.
grain yield per plot e0 Verbatim
t0 “SUNFLOWER ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–59 e0 “For grain weight per plant and grain yield per plot with lower heritability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–332 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Number of pods per plant and seed yield per hill- plot increased linearly as the number of plants per hill- plot decreased.
the number of plants per hill-plot decreased e0 Number of pods per plant and seed yield per hill-plot e0 in a linear fashion e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Bean Genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–36 e0 “Number of pods per plant and seed yield per hill- plot increased in a linear fashion as the number of plants per hill- plot decreased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–866 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Stalk number per plot independently and jointly with stalk weight determined cane yield per plot .
stalk number/plot and stalk weight independently and in combination e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The study revealed the importance of stalk number/ plot and stalk weight independently and in combination in determining the cane yield / plot . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–389 t0 “Sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–88 Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher cabbage density produced the highest yield per plot .
this treatment e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “this treatment produced the highest yield per plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1123 t0 “cabbage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–74 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Harvest index, kernels per ear, and yield per ear were associated with plot yield .
Harvest index, kernels per ear, and yield per ear e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Harvest index, kernels per ear, and yield per ear were associated with plot yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–328 t0 “WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed yield per plot correlated closely and positively with yield per plant.
Verbatim
e0 “Seed yield / plot was closely and positively correlated with number of pods/plant and yield /plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–561 t0 “field beans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–66 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Awn presence increased yield per plot .
Verbatim
e0 “Presence of awns on the spike was found to increase 1000-grain weight and yield per plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–301 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield per plot , pods per plant and peas per pod were not consistently correlated across arrangements or harvest times.
Yield per plot, pods per plant, and peas per pod e0 planting arrangements e0 Not reported Taxon Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Yield per plot , pods per plant, and peas per pod were not consistently correlated between planting arrangements nor between tunes of harvest. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–991 t0 “Peas ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Cow cockle seed yield per plot rose with density to 67–127 plants per square meter, then declined.
total yield of weed seed per plot e0 67 to 127 plants/m 2 e0 Verbatim
e0 “The total yield of weed seed per plot increased with density up to around 67 to 127 plants/m 2 in flax, but declined with higher densities. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–995 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Final yield per plot of weeping love grass was constant regardless of sowing density.
final yield per each plot e5 no_change inferred e5 Verbatim
t0 “Early growth of weeping love grass and its competition-Density effect ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 e5 “At that time final yield per each plot was constant independently of density (formula (2)) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–808 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Plot variance of mean yield per unit area followed an approximately linear logarithmic relation with plot size.
plot variance of the mean yield per unit area e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The regression of the plot variance of the mean yield per unit area on size of plot approximately follows a linear logarithmic relationship. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–576 t0 “groundnuts ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–32 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Plot error variance was large for lint yield , bolls per plant and seed per boll.
lint yield, bolls per plant, seed per boll e0 Verbatim
e0 “Plot error variances were large for lint yield , bolls per plant, seed per boll, and boll weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–104 t0 “Upland Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–83 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Only plot B' increased yield per area.
treated until the adventive bud was visible e1 yield based upon area e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “plot B' alone showed a higher yield based upon area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2556–2607 e1 “Plot B' Seed pieces were treated until the adventive bud was visible ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1687–1755 t0 “Chinese yam ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–41 Other claims from this paper (19) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Sampling errors per plot were 5 to 6 per cent of the mean yield , low enough for little loss of information.
samplingerrors per plot e1 between 5 and 6 per cent. of the mean yield e1 sufficiently low for there to be little loss of information e1 Verbatim
e0 “Cereal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 e1 “the samplingerrors per plot lie between 5 and 6 per cent. of the mean yield , and that these errors are sufficiently low for there to be little loss of information ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–649 Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Maximum yield loss in one plot was 42%.
Verbatim
e0 “with a maximum loss in any plot of 42 per cent ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2199–2245 t0 “WHEAT AND BARLEY ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–41 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield s per plot of the three-line blends corresponded to the expectation.
no_change inferred e3 the expectation e3 Verbatim
t0 “New Zealand wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–52 e3 “Whilst the yield s per plot of the blends corresponded to the expectation, the yield analyses revealed that the component varieties exerted a modifying influence on each other, which was different in each of the three trials ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–853 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Average total wheat grain yield was 149·57 lb. per plot , with a standard error of 6·39 lb.
yield of total grain per plot e0 standard error of 6·39 lb. e0 Verbatim
e0 “the average yield of total grain per plot being 149·57 lb., with a standard error of 6·39 lb. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1035 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–198 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Average total wheat straw yield was 194·35 lb. per plot , with a standard error of 7·55 lb.
yield of total straw per plot e0 standard error of 7·55 lb. e0 Verbatim
e0 “the average yield of total straw per plot was 194·35 lb., with a standard error of 7·55 lb. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1131 e1 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–198 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
A 5% expected yield difference would require 214 single- plot centers.
necessary to have 214 centres e0 Verbatim
e0 “when the difference is not likely to be more than about 5 per cent, it would be necessary to have 214 centres ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–708 t0 “Adopting single plot trials an 18 per cent, error means that when determining the superiority in the yield of grain of one variety over that of another ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–594 e1 “one variety of oat with that of another ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–180 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivum
Eleusine coracana
Glycine max
Capsicum annuum
Zea mays
Cucumis sativus
Helianthus annuus
Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Linum usitatissimum
Eragrostis curvula
Arachis hypogaea
Dioscorea polystachya
Avena sativa